Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum
Sign in to follow this  
irish ike, SASS #43615

WTC, sort of interpretation of Firearm Conventions

Recommended Posts

At our shoot this weekend we had a stage that required 9 rifle and 9 pistol. No reloads and the targets were to be shot in a continuous Nevada sweep.

We had a posse marshal and a Black Badge instructor say the 9 rounds of pistol violated the Firearm Conventions for pistols.

 

image.png.865880ed52f9884cf9ea44a7c0c57133.png

The MD and other PM's said the convention was to insure not overloading, as in 6 rounds, a pistol. We shot the stage with 9 rounds.

Let's not get into a , "why would anyone ever call for 9 pistol rounds", discussion

Ike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read that as prohibiting the loading of 6 rounds at the loading table.

As opposed to:
"ALWAYS load 5 rounds into the revolver"

--Dawg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"unless otherwise directed by stage design/description"

 

Sounds like the stage instructions dictated 9 in the pistol.

 

Stage conventions happen "unless" overridden by instructions. No different than the instructions stating that shooter must set pistols on table after firing. The convention was overridden by stage instructions.

 

Safety convention, hammer must be down on empty, cannot be overridden.

Edited by Branchwater Jack SASS #88854
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the Black Badge PIN Instructor could benefit from a refresher course (or, at least, a more thorough study of the SHB)

<_<

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495LI will admit, that if we are to take a hard interpretation of the safety convention - and insist that the entire convention must be followed and not overridden...

 

Six-gun revolvers are always loaded with only five rounds and the hammer lowered and resting on the empty chamber.

 

The use of only implies that six-gun revolvers may only load five rounds exclusively - and nothing else besides.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Branchwater Jack SASS #88854 said:

@PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495LI will admit, that if we are to take a hard interpretation of the safety convention - and insist that the entire convention must be followed and not overridden...

 

Six-gun revolvers are always loaded with only five rounds and the hammer lowered and resting on the empty chamber.

 

The use of only implies that six-gun revolvers may only load five rounds exclusively - and nothing else besides.

 

"Hard interpretations" without an application of common sense based on the reason for the convention (i.e. preventing movement with a live round under the hammer) are why the exception was written into the "preamble" of that section.

The provision to override a convention via stage instructions applies as long as the action required is safe.

The original list of Stage Conventions contained a few items that could NOT be safely overridden...those were subsequently removed.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the discussion that took place. We also approached it with, as long as it doesn't impact or compromise SASS safety conventions then it should be OK. We instructed the PM's and the posse's that shooters could not load 6 and 3 just in case.

 

Branchwater, the discussion did approach it as you present it. But we determined it didn't impact safety so OK.

 

And very few tried to shoot a non existing 10th round.

Ike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L said:

Sounds like the Black Badge PIN Instructor could benefit from a refresher course (or, at least, a more thorough study of the SHB)

<_<

Unfortunately I've delt with two black pins lately that need a refresher. I was lucky enough to talk with lassiter and flying shootist and get a few things straightened out at Illinois st.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of us are products of our environment.

I live in a world where everything supposed be done as printed in the manual.  Funny part is after reviewing the 6 pages in the manual and associated placards, on the proper use of the toilet on one of the A/C I fly no place in the manual does it say you should flush the toilet when you get done with your business..  ;)

Common Sense is an integral part of interpreting the rules.  Having to make the call on the spot and an the heat of battle no matter who you are is difficult, misinterpretations do happen and usually because of a disconnect between reading what is in black and white in the book, and what the “Intent” of the written word is as published.

On my first reading and reflection of the initial post, I agreed that the printed word says clearly that six-guns are always loaded with only five rounds and the hammer lowered and down on an empty chamber, then further reflection (Common Sense) takes me to, less than 5 rounds is not stated, in the manual, but does not present an unsafe condition thus should be permissible.  Maybe the verbiage should read “not more than five rounds” I don’t know there and that is a decision above my pay grade.

At the end of the day the manual is quite good, not perfect, but the best we have, in conveying the “Intent” of the rules of the game.  Just because one makes a call in the heat of battle that later upon further consideration, might not have been the “Best/Correct” answer, Common Sense, also does not lead to the need to question the competency of the individuals making the call.  It should be used as an opportunity to educate all parties.

F.S.

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why someone would write a stage with 5 rds in one pistol and 4 in the other??

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Because it’s fun. Sometimes you have to do things differently than the same old 10 pistol 20 rifle 2+ shotgun. very simple very easy just use common sense five in your first pistol four  in your second pistol count to nine simple math. we should all be able to do it. Oh yeah Phantom you don’t need to chime in I took care of it. Ha Ha. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Equanimous Phil said:

@irish ike, SASS #43615

Just wondering how many of the posse had to ask how to load those four rounds? :ph34r:

 

I know I didn't ask, I used common sense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should hear them scream and brains screech when you write a stage all the guns staged empty!

 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I as well utilized a little bit of common sense and got through the stage just fine as did the rest of the posse I was shooting with. Matter of fact I shot clean for the match. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why 9 pistol rounds? Because the sport has become a 10-10-4 every stage shoot. When you write a stage with something different than that you can just see the vacuum tubes light up in posse's heads! The other half of this is the match was a Tom Horn match. You can shoot regular cowboy, yawn stages. Or you can shoot 12 stages of big bore single shot or lever action rifle. BP or smokeless. So take that 10-10-4. Half of our shooters signed up for the big bore side of the shoot.

Ike

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have shot many 9 shot, 9 with a reload stages. No issues.

 

I have never heard a complaint at the three ranges I shoot at when things get out-of-the-ordinary. They seem to go out of their way to be out of the ordinary.

Must be a Kentucky thing...

 

Everyone seems to derive great pleasure after shooting a total train wreck!

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/17/2019 at 11:05 AM, Blast Masterson said:

I have shot many 9 shot, 9 with a reload stages. No issues.

 

I have never heard a complaint at the three ranges I shoot at when things get out-of-the-ordinary. They seem to go out of their way to be out of the ordinary.

Must be a Kentucky thing...

 

Everyone seems to derive great pleasure after shooting a total train wreck!

 

 

It sounds like I need to come and shoot in Kentucky then!  I love out of the ordinary! 

The OTJ

Edited by The Outlaw Travis James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our rule was, If it's safe, it's shootable. Have shoot several 9 pistol shot stages but been a while. Also 12 rifle 11 pistol where you reload on the clock. Oh My!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a non-issue. Pistols are loaded with a max of 5 rounds, nothing states one must load 5.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Okay....

 

Six-gun revolvers are always loaded with only five rounds and the hammer lowered and resting on the empty chamber.

 

On my left hip I have an 1860 Colt, Konverted to shoot cartridges.   It has a five shot cylinder.   Therefore, it is a "Five-gun."

On my right hip is a Nagant, it has a 7 shot cylinder.  Therefore it is a "Seven-gun."

 

Therefore, I should be allowed to load 4 in the Colt, and 6 in the Nagant.  Both revolvers will have the hammer down on an empty chamber.   This allows me to safely have the needed 10 rounds in a typical stage.
 

I've seen more than a few 9 shot pistol strings over the years, and the question of it being against the conventions has never been brought up.  Usually the nine shots are done to mirror a 9 shot rifle string, most commonly where you have three targets with three rounds on each in whatever order.   [But not always".]

 

Come on folks, let's not get silly here...

Edited by H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 said:

Therefore, I should be allowed to load 4 in the Colt, and 6 in the Nagant.  Both revolvers will have the hammer down on an empty chamber.   This allows me to safely have the needed 10 rounds in a typical stage.

If you do you should let the TO & the rest of the posse know,  else you're gonna hear a lot of "one more" being yelled when you shoot that colt.

Note: I'm NOT saying it's legal to load like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Yusta B. said:

If you do you should let the TO & the rest of the posse know,  else you're gonna hear a lot of "one more" being yelled when you shoot that colt.

Note: I'm NOT saying it's legal to load like this.

 

 I am pretty sure it's specifically not allowed.   I was giving this as an example of a taking something to a ridiculous extreme.  :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you really don't need to mess with round count to make the game interesting,,, I went to a regional once that had only 5 revolver rounds and you couldn't  split them for gf,  and only 9 rifle on that stage, 4 sg, and nothing else,,, told them I'd never be back, and haven't!

 

you want interesting? try rifle, sg p sg p sg,,,,   doesn't matter the target sequence,,,  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears to me that the Firearms Convention for handguns (noted elsewhere, above), should be revised.

 

Its current iteration lends itself to a few questions that should not have to be interpreted, perhaps differently, by individual clubs’ TO’s or posse leaders under match conditions, at local club matches.

 

Someone make a note to review, please.

 

Cat Brules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is impossible to write an IDIOT PROOF instruction.  Revising the Firearms Convention would accomplish ZERO.  Someone would still demonstrate they are basically STUPID and you cannot fix STUPID.  There is a simple requirement for Common Sense.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Colorado Coffinmaker said:

 

It is impossible to write an IDIOT PROOF instruction.  Revising the Firearms Convention would accomplish ZERO.  Someone would still demonstrate they are basically STUPID and you cannot fix STUPID.  There is a simple requirement for Common Sense.

 

CC:

Well, you have your opinion and I have mine.  You are wrong.  One of my (many) opinions is that revisiting the handgun/ammo convention (above) is SIMPLE.....EASY....NOT DIFFICULT.   Further to your point, I haven’t met any real idiots or stupid cowboys shooting CAS;  I’ve met a lot of nice people.  But, I ALSO have met more than a few spring-loaded a&%#@$#$ along the way.  But then, you know (right?) what they say about opinions?  

— “Opinions are like noses; everybody has one.”

 

Another of my (many) opinions is that..... if proper thought and attention had been given to writing SASS rules and conventions going in, and then later, properly and routinely reviewed in earlier days, much or most of this sometimes confusing or incomplete language, as above, would have been fixed a long time ago....(easy for ME to say). So now it’s been highlighted and should be reviewed and fixed....because it IS broken.....in my opinion, of course.

 

HAND,

Cat Brules

 

 

 

 

Edited by Cat Brules
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 rounds in one pistol? Big deal!! Not a safety problem and it's something a little different;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any revisions to rules or conventions have to be voted on by the Territorial Governors.  The ROC can propose changes, as in the "cocked hammer from the loading table", but do not just change rules on their own.   They can rule on interpretations.  Coming out with a new version of the Handbook every time someone thinks that wording should be changed would result in a never-ending stream of "updates", sort of like the ever-present "Windows updates".   

 

We are currently using SHB Vers 23.2, just to show you how many revisions the Handbook has gone through.  For 2020 there will be a new version, and as always, there will be some updates to the wording, and clarifications.  But, they are trying to keep the Handbook manageable, and not publish and Encyclopedia version. 

 

Please remember that the members of the ROC are volunteers, and as all of us, have real lives, jobs, and families.  They've been doing a great job, doing the best they can while balancing work/life, and other "real world" stuff.  So, give them a break instead of demanding immediate fixes. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Eliphalet R. Moderator said:

Any revisions to rules or conventions have to be voted on by the Territorial Governors.  The ROC can propose changes, as in the "cocked hammer from the loading table", but do not just change rules on their own.   They can rule on interpretations.  Coming out with a new version of the Handbook every time someone thinks that wording should be changed would result in a never-ending stream of "updates", sort of like the ever-present "Windows updates".   

 

We are currently using SHB Vers 23.2, just to show you how many revisions the Handbook has gone through.  For 2020 there will be a new version, and as always, there will be some updates to the wording, and clarifications.  But, they are trying to keep the Handbook manageable, and not publish and Encyclopedia version. 

 

Please remember that the members of the ROC are volunteers, and as all of us, have real lives, jobs, and families.  They've been doing a great job, doing the best they can while balancing work/life, and other "real world" stuff.  So, give them a break instead of demanding immediate fixes. 

+1  people have NOOOOO idea the amount of time the ROC has spent in the past, present and will in the future trying to keep things simple,,,yet try to cover almost every situation possible,,,  it gets old hearing whiners crying over things that are so simplistic and or only come into question every 20 years or so

 

and you have NO idea of the heated discussions that go on in the ROC too,  but once it's settled it's done and everyone goes back to playing cowboy again

 

flame away,,, I've got more!!

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After writing a diatribe about the vagaries of interpretations... I am probably wasting my time... so... no comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.