Dutch Nichols, SASS #6461 Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 I saw on local news some proposed regulations for WA and OR regarding 5 rd magazine limits with the new reg to only be able to purchase 20 rds a month!? Can this really be happening? WA and OR pards please chime in and explain further as it was just a 2 minute tease on our local news. my thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Hanger #3720LR Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 https://www.reddit.com/r/liberalgunowners/comments/aesqvr/oregon_senate_bill_501_introduced_bans_magazines/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deacon Henry, SASS #53503L Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Yes it’s happening. In PA and VA and federally among others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marauder SASS #13056 Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Yes, we are the democrat (social dictator) government and we are here to protect you. - - P.S. Please send us your money - or go to jail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clueless Bob Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 When stupid people vote in stupid representatives, we get stupid prizes that insults, restricts and impedes the law abiding citizens!!! All I can hope for is there are still some level heads in those states that can make sure this dies very quickly before it gains any headway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Wonder if that means I can only buy 1/100 lb of Bullseye per month? And shoot just one stage a month? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward R S Canby, SASS#59971 Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Here is an article on the bill in the Oregonian. The bill generously excludes "lever action revolvers." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Oregon, not Washington. Somebody introduced a bill. Hundreds of bills get introduced for every one that goes somewhere. Which is not to mean that all efforts should not be aroused. Nor are these "proposed regulations". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Barleycorn, SASS #76982 Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 21 hours ago, Deacon Henry, SASS #53503L said: Yes it’s happening. In PA and VA and federally among others. Where in PA? If you’re talking about Pittsburgh the state has a preemption law already on the books that prohibit local government from making gun laws. Anything the idiot mayor of Pittsburgh introduces will be unenforceable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major BS Walker Regulator Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Not in Virginia. Maybe in DC but we have constructed a wall to keep that in and out of our fine state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deacon Henry, SASS #53503L Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Yes hundreds of Bills are introduced and many don't see daylight but I am in NY and what may be far off track becomes reality. Don't want to get into a big political discussion here but this type of legislation is not just a NY thing. Best regards and keep the faith, your pard, Deacon Henry Check your NRA_ILA sites also Bearing Arms. The NRA site as you all probably know is a State by State tracking of new legislation. VA This session: RICHMOND, Va. (WSET) -- Governor Ralph Northam has announced a comprehensive package of legislation that he claims will prevent gun violence and improve the safety of Virginia’s citizens and communities. He said the package includes measures to require universal background checks; establish an Extreme Risk Protective Order; reinstate Virginia’s One Handgun a Month law; prohibit individuals subject to final protective orders from possessing firearms; ban assault firearms; prevent children from accessing firearms; and require individuals to report lost or stolen firearms to law enforcement. PA Pennsylvania Governor Calls for Total Ban on all Semi-Automatic Weapons by JORDAN MICHAELS on JANUARY 10, 2019 Related Tags: Buzz, Gun Control, News, R2KBA Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf believes no one should have semi-automatic firearms. (Photo: Governor Tom Wolf Facebook) Just one day after a gun-rights rally in Pittsburgh that attracted hundreds of gun owners protesting the city’s proposed “assault weapons” ban, Democratic Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf voiced his support for a complete ban on all semi-automatic weapons. When asked by KDKR Newsradio host Larry Richert whether the state of Pennsylvania should restrict or eliminate semi-automatic weapons, Gov. Wolf responded, “I think they should. I support that. Those are the weapons that killed those innocent people in Squirrel Hill and have done so much damage in schools and in places all around the country. We shouldn’t have those [guns].” Though Wolf incorporates all semi-automatic firearms in his answer to Richert’s question (the Squirrel Hill murderer used handguns and a rifle), he walked back his stance later that day in a tweet that only mentioned “semi-automatic rifles.” The governor doesn’t want to take away anyone’s guns, of course. Later in the segment, Richert commented, “People from one side or the other go to the complete extreme – you’re trying to take away my weapons, and that’s not the case.” “No,” Wolf agreed. And yet, the head of Pennsylvania’s executive branch hopes the state legislature will implement restrictions on gun ownership similar to those proposed by Pittsburgh’s city council, which include a ban on some semi-automatic rifles. SEE ALSO: Key Case Challenging Fed Ban of Handgun Sales to Non-State Residents Gains Momentum As GunsAmerica reported previously, Pittsburgh Mayor William Peduto recently announced a trio of gun rights restrictions, including an “assault weapons” ban, an accessories/magazine/ammunition ban, and a gun confiscation scheme. Peduto’s announcement is likely nothing more than grandstanding because Pennsylvania state law prohibits local governments from passing ordinances that contradict state law. But Gov. Wolf hopes the legislature will sign on to Peduto’s proposals. “I mean even the president is talking about eliminating, making bump stocks illegal. I think we ought to have a universal background check,” he said on KDKR. “We should not have people (with) easy access to the weapons that killed all those innocent victims in Squirrel Hill. We’re all in different ways trying to figure out what is the way to recognize the rights of gun owners but also make ourselves safe. I think this is a good conversation to have.” It’s unclear whether Wolf will be able to implement his gun ban dreams. Republicans have a 21-seat majority in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and a 7-seat majority in the Senate. * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboy Junky Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 Liberalism never stops......it' like rust. They just keep eroding our freedoms until one day you wake up and it's gone. We the sheepole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manomet Mac Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Surprised they didn't want to tax something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boothill Bandit, SASS# 48598 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Yes, it is proposed. Drafted by a bunch of clueless Lake Oswego high school students who aren't even old enough to own a gun much less vote, and forwarded to Representative Andrea Salinas. Democrat - District 38 - Lake Oswego. . https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB501/Introduced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Eye Jim Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Unfortunately, Oregon has a Democratic Super Majority right now. This has likely got some legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rainmaker, SASS #11631 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 The Pennsylvania governor is exactly right: "We shouldn't have those(guns)" People who attempt to subvert our constitution should NOT have ANY means in which to do so, especially the power they claim. Legally obtained firearms belong to the patriots who will (and HAVE) stand up to tyrants and dictators. These proposals are VERY serious and must be defeated at all costs. MY two sense. Yes, I know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marauder SASS #13056 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Evil does not give up. It must be defeated - again and again. We go on and live our lives. The socialistic dictator party members for the most part work day and night to do what they want even though it will not achieve the results most of them want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Now I need some Bulleit........ OLG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manomet Mac Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Patrick Henry, Virginia's Constitution ratification convention, June 5, 1788 "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force." "Where and when did freedom exist when the power of the sword and purse were given up from the people?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croc Holiday Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 This is what happens when folks who don't understand nor want understand gun culture write gun laws. An example of the problem... My Ma is liberal and wants gun control. I showed her an "assault style" rifle and another rifle with wood stock. Asked her which should be banned. Naturally she picked the "assault" rifle. I told her choice outlines the problem. "It's the same gun ma. You just banned the scary looking one and solved nothing. That's why your team writing gun laws is just plain dumb." They were both a Ruger 10/22 haha. One was stock and the other had a fancy stock, banana mag, dot sight and flash suppressor (terrifying!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Shapiro Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 These laws are never about crime, or “feel good”. They are about banning guns so the elites can take over. Plain and simple. Never forget, never surrender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dantankerous Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 2 hours ago, Doc Shapiro said: These laws are never about crime, or “feel good”. They are about banning guns so the elites can take over. Plain and simple. Never forget, never surrender. Exactly. 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 3 hours ago, Doc Shapiro said: These laws are never about crime, or “feel good”. They are about banning guns so the elites can take over. Plain and simple. Never forget, never surrender. It's about hav'n control over others-Plain and simple. OLG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rainmaker, SASS #11631 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 Some pretty powerful and notorious political leaders in history have favored gun control. Quite the long list. Anyone remember a guy named Hitler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Shapiro Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 6 hours ago, Half Deaf Hoss Deveraux said: This is what happens when folks who don't understand nor want understand gun culture write gun laws. An example of the problem... My Ma is liberal and wants gun control. I showed her an "assault style" rifle and another rifle with wood stock. Asked her which should be banned. Naturally she picked the "assault" rifle. I told her choice outlines the problem. "It's the same gun ma. You just banned the scary looking one and solved nothing. That's why your team writing gun laws is just plain dumb." They were both a Ruger 10/22 haha. One was stock and the other had a fancy stock, banana mag, dot sight and flash suppressor (terrifying!). Welcome aboard! That said, what the hell is "gun culture" and what's it got to do with it? What they're after is power and control. They know exactly what they're doing and why. The only thing standing between a Constitutional Republic and an Authoritarian regime is 80 million gun owners. They know it. They're hoping we don't. Never lose sight of that. Mao was once asked why China didn't invade the US. His response was "there's a rifle behind every blade of grass." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marauder SASS #13056 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 As Doc and others have said, this is merely a step to totally control people. As you watch they now openly admit that each of the laws is "a beginning." Their leadership doesn't believe in many things we hold dear: The right of ownership of property The right to speak out for our beliefs The right of privacy Right to life itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Doc Shapiro said: Welcome aboard! That said, what the hell is "gun culture" and what's it got to do with it? What they're after is power and control. They know exactly what they're doing and why. The only thing standing between a Constitutional Republic and an Authoritarian regime is 80 million gun owners. They know it. They're hoping we don't. Never lose sight of that. Mao was once asked why China didn't invade the US. His response was "there's a rifle behind every blade of grass." That quote was not made by Mao. Believe it was found in government doc at the end of WWII (Japanese), and concerned the topic of invading the US mainland. Agree with the rest of your post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Shapiro Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 27 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: That quote was not made by Mao. Believe it was found in government doc at the end of WWII (Japanese), and concerned the topic of invading the US mainland. Agree with the rest of your post I just looked it up. You're right. It was Yamamoto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 5 hours ago, Doc Shapiro said: I just looked it up. You're right. It was Yamamoto. Some history of the quote..... https://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/misquoting-yamamoto/ OLG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rainmaker, SASS #11631 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 Doesn't really matter who said it... it was said. They knew it, the oligarchs that run the world know it. Do we? Do we as a people know that every firearm in private (responsible) ownership is one more deterrent to regimes that will tell us what to do, where to go (or not) and when? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudflat Mike, SASS #20904 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 I'll do what I've done for years. Ignore it There is not one (1) law enforecemnt agency in Wa. state that will enforce the bad law we got with I 594 passed 4 years ago. I'm betting no one will enforce any crazy new law that's outright unconstitutional. Keep voting for them democracts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch Nichols, SASS #6461 Posted January 18, 2019 Author Share Posted January 18, 2019 Know ‘ll get flamed but I was employed by a fairly lg sheriffs dept if you think LE’s will not enforce you need a wake up am I risking my job and my pension, my family’s security, to NOT enforce any such laws....... think again All these County Sheriffs spouting they won’t enforce any such laws will be quickly terminated if they do not When Cali passed thir bans anyone who had any license within/ from the state, ie cpa, contractors, etc., could lose ther license for most any firearms related offense If such laws pass they will be enforced, sad but true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tell Sackett SASS 18436 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 Yep, LEOs are more interested in keeping their jobs and pensions than worrying about how "constitutional" a law is. Just look around the country. "We were just following orders". Ring a bell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudflat Mike, SASS #20904 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 22 minutes ago, Dutch Nichols, SASS #6461 said: Know ‘ll get flamed but I was employed by a fairly lg sheriffs dept if you think LE’s will not enforce you need a wake up am I risking my job and my pension, my family’s security, to NOT enforce any such laws....... think again All these County Sheriffs spouting they won’t enforce any such laws will be quickly terminated if they do not When Cali passed thir bans anyone who had any license within/ from the state, ie cpa, contractors, etc., could lose ther license for most any firearms related offense If such laws pass they will be enforced, sad but true Well, I'm retired from a fairly big dept and I'll tell you, there is not a police chief nor sheriff in this state that is enforcing these laws. Remember "I was just following orders" is not a defense, they tried that at Nuremburg remember? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 5 hours ago, The Rainmaker, SASS #11631 said: Doesn't really matter who said it... it was said. They knew it, the oligarchs that run the world know it. Do we? Do we as a people know that every firearm in private (responsible) ownership is one more deterrent to regimes that will tell us what to do, where to go (or not) and when? Of course it doesn't... Accuracy in history is meaningless. Oy .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.