Phantom, SASS #54973

Good lord... Phantom

Probably???? 🤣

Can't speak for the board, but when I was around we always made allowances for those with medical needs. Phantom

So in this case, there is absolutely no way of knowing the condition (loaded / unloaded), of your rifle...so I'll ask you since the same question that the other person refuses to answer: If a shooter is 2 steps from the ULT and their SG closes, will you SDQ them for taking those 2 steps to the ULT with the closed SG? Phantom

I believe he's referring to a vehicle... Phantom

1950's...what? That's not considered "modern"? Choosing acceptable loads are done the same way with a '97 as it is with any other SG. Loading the magazine rules are in the rule book...some club allow stoking over the allowed SASS restrictions. Phantom

This has been proven wrong... Phantom

Actually...yer wrong (ref. Larson's post). But...what's your point? Phantom

Not a test gun or prototype. But yes, rare as stated above. I believe all had the upside down wedge. Phantom

If I didn't drink while on the Wire...things would get real ugly real fast. 🤗

They had Gun Carts in the Old West?? 😵 Phantom

I responded to your last post seen on page one...obviously didn't look to see if the answer was already given...it happens. Phantom

No. You can break the 170 without sweeping someone. If your buddy got a MDQ for breaking the 170 without sweeping anyone...he got ripped off. Phantom

Nope - just an SDQ. I'm sure someone will look up the exact wording, but I believe that the violation of the 170 doesn't distinguish between "loaded" and "unloaded". Phantom

Other than the obvious violations...you know...when the revolver is pointing right at you...how often is a slight violation of the 180 called? Not very often... Phantom