Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/12/18/end-line-for-lead-bullet-regulations-bans-force-switch-to-green-ammo/ GG ~
Marshal Dan Troop 70448 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 I like the part of saving the Eagle, when the enviromental windmills have been killing them. MT
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 That is close to the most ignorant article I've seen yet about the Doe Run lead smelter shutdown. You wouldn't have to swing a dead cat very long before you'd hit a couple of idiots from that article. 1000 tons of lead would be saved by the DOD each year by going to copper slugs that don't have as much range as our current ammunition. Wow, that would really save the world, and the Pentagon's budget. Just think, replace about $2 million in lead costs in the ammo with about $8 million for the replacement copper. Yep, great economics, and a minuscule drop in the Pentagon's budget bucket. Good luck, GJ
Warden Callaway Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 They tried to do all of this back in the Carter administration.
Branchwater Jack SASS #88854 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 I guess we'll have to import more lead now.
C. Erroll Madre Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 That is close to the most ignorant article I've seen yet about the Doe Run lead smelter shutdown. You wouldn't have to swing a dead cat very long before you'd hit a couple of idiots from that article. 1000 tons of lead would be saved by the DOD each year by going to copper slugs that don't have as much range as our current ammunition. Wow, that would really save the world, and the Pentagon's budget. Just think, replace about $2 million in lead costs in the ammo with about $8 million for the replacement copper. Yep, great economics, and a minuscule drop in the Pentagon's budget bucket. Good luck, GJ That's okay, the Pentagon can afford it that now that the administration just screwed over all of us Veterans out of our COLA. They tried to do all of this back in the Carter administration. It didn't work then because the environmental loonies weren't as organized and didn't have social/mainstream media in their pockets like they do now. Even though the news story was geared towards the military & one smelter, my question is how will this affect the smaller manufacturers that many of us use now, i.e. Chey-Cast, Meister, etc..? Will they still be in business? Will they still be able to obtain lead? Since I mold my own bullets, will I be able to get lead? If you think it will be bad for Cowboy Action, think of what lead availability or a severe price increase would do to the N-SSA.
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Nut'n will happen. Sky is NOT fall'n. Even the ammo/bullet makers have said this. http://sierrabullets.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/sierra-responds-how-will-the-closure-of-the-lead-smelting-plant-affect-sierra-bullets/ LG
Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted December 18, 2013 Author Posted December 18, 2013 Nut'n will happen. Sky is NOT fall'n. Even the ammo/bullet makers have said this. http://sierrabullets.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/sierra-responds-how-will-the-closure-of-the-lead-smelting-plant-affect-sierra-bullets/ LG Yeah - didn't know one way or the other and just put the article up for thoughts - thanks for sharing the Sierra Bullet statement. GG ~
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 GG, just check out Rotometals site. http://www.rotometals.com/ Just rec'd 300 lbs of 30:1 alloy last week. LG
Utah Bob #35998 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Nut'n will happen. Sky is NOT fall'n. Even the ammo/bullet makers have said this. http://sierrabullets.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/sierra-responds-how-will-the-closure-of-the-lead-smelting-plant-affect-sierra-bullets/ LG +1
Capt. R. Hugh Kidnme Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 That is close to the most ignorant article I've seen yet about the Doe Run lead smelter shutdown. You wouldn't have to swing a dead cat very long before you'd hit a couple of idiots from that article. 1000 tons of lead would be saved by the DOD each year by going to copper slugs that don't have as much range as our current ammunition. Wow, that would really save the world, and the Pentagon's budget. Just think, replace about $2 million in lead costs in the ammo with about $8 million for the replacement copper. Yep, great economics, and a minuscule drop in the Pentagon's budget bucket. Good luck, GJ GJ, That's a funny one. You thinkin' that the DOD or the Pentagon even realizing they have a budget.
Henry T Harrison Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 Has anyone ever explained to these idiots just where lead comes from?
Edward R S Canby, SASS#59971 Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 The article doesn't surprise me but seeing it on Fox News does. I expect this sort of article in the Huffington Post or Mother Jones but not Fox News which is not know as a mouthpiece for leftist misinformation.
Cholla Hill Tirador Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Think about it though, lead has been removed from the earth and used for many generations and with the recycling craze, there's likely far, far less need to remove it from the earth and process it since it's so plentiful due to recycling. Also, if the military stops using lead, demand for lead will fall and lead prices should fall with the demand. Unless I'm missing something, sounds like win/win for lead bullet users. Now copper, on the other hand, will be another matter entirely. Since the militaries use of copper will increase, thereby increasing demand, I expect copper prices will skyrocket with this demand. CHT
Yul Lose Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Copper thefts are bad now and as the price goes up so will the number of thefts.
Buzzard II Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 So now china will be selling us lead. EPA and Obama strike again!
Yul Lose Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 China's been selling us lead in the rice and other foods we import from them for decades.
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 The amount of lead or copper that is consumed in the projectiles of small arms ammo for the DoD is a small percentage of the overall use of those two metals in the United States. US consumption of copper is about 2 million tons a year. Estimated use in US ammunition is only about 5,000 tons a year. That is 0.25% or less of the copper we use. Using even as much as twice as much would not raise the copper price a noticeable amount. A little common sense and calm goes a long way anymore. GJ
Cpt Dan Blodgett, SASS #75655 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 GJ, That's a funny one. You thinkin' that the DOD or the Pentagon even realizing they have a budget. Not to worry, the additional costs will be offset by the reduction in retiree benefits and limiting cost of living increases for retirement pay to 1%. Should additional funds be needed Tri Care premiums will go to a monthly cost of 60% of active duty pay and 87% of retiree pay and tri care for life 100% retiree pay plus 25% of social security
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 So now china will be selling us lead. EPA and Obama strike again! Actually, no, China needs all of it's own lead production to put in car batteries as it sells a car to perhaps one out of three of the 500 million households in their country over the next ten years. China right now is an importer of our scrap lead. Our lead imports will come from Australia, Peru or Mexico. Good luck, GJ
McCandless Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 I'm just concerned about the environ-mentals gearing up to stop us using lead ammo. Let's just suppose someone has been loading ammo in quite some quantity, stocking up, looking forward to the time when they are retired and couldn't afford the cost of components anymore. Do y'all think that person might be stuck with a large stockpile of ammo they can't use?? Just supposin' Duc
Texas Jim Henry, SASS #20616 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Yep... nothing more important than killing an enemy with an environmentally-friendy bullet. I'm sure it will make them feel better, too! What a crock. Regards, TJH
Assassin Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 There are still alot of cities that have not removed lead water pipes from public water systems. One of the board of public utility guys that works for the city of Cheyenne gives me some of the lead pipe as they replace it. They replace it when they find it, usually when replacing old meters they run a scope through the line and check for lead.
Zekest Crowe Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 At the distances we shoot, would aluminum bullets, as in recycled soda and beer cans be a viable option?
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Zinc. Has been used before for target bullets. Would work again. But, we won't need to, that's my projection. Quit worrying, get to shootin. GJ
Olen Rugged Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 ...and take a rake to the range with you. Just clean up around a few of the static targets and in a few months you will have enough lead to get into production at home. Around the rifle targets you will find many almost whole projectiles. The surface of the berm near by will likely be covered with slightly deformed bullets. "Mining" ranges is productive and profitable.
Allie Mo, SASS No. 25217 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Hello, California has not banned lead bullets entirely. They are only banned for hunting. Regards, Allie Mo
Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted December 19, 2013 Author Posted December 19, 2013 Hello, California has not banned lead bullets entirely. They are only banned for hunting. Regards, Allie Mo Yup - and that is just the beginning... GG ~
Shooting Bull Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 The good folks at Missouri Bullets have been trying to put this B.S. to rest for months, if not years. The lead they use for bullets is almost exclusively recycled. The shutdown of the smelter isn't going to affect them in the least, other than to raise a panic and set off another wave of hoarding.
Charles B. Gatewood SASS #48517 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 The good folks at Missouri Bullets have been trying to put this B.S. to rest for months, if not years. The lead they use for bullets is almost exclusively recycled. The shutdown of the smelter isn't going to affect them in the least, other than to raise a panic and set off another wave of hoarding. Yup! +1
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 At the distances we shoot, would aluminum bullets, as in recycled soda and beer cans be a viable option? Alum melts at to high a temp to for home casters. In all the history of small-arms. Lead has been found to be the best. LG
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 The good folks at Missouri Bullets have been trying to put this B.S. to rest for months, if not years. The lead they use for bullets is almost exclusively recycled. The shutdown of the smelter isn't going to affect them in the least, other than to raise a panic and set off another wave of hoarding. THIS X2! That smelter did NOT supply any lead for 'our' use. LG
Hoss Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Hello, California has not banned lead bullets entirely. They are only banned for hunting. Regards, Allie Mo Yup - and that is just the beginning... GG ~ Starting January 1 all bank robbers, murderes, terroist must use environmentally friendy bullets, made from aluminum, copper or compacted fairy dust. Violators of these statues will lose their Starbucks priveleges for 2 months.
Madd Mike #8595 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 you can try to take the lead from my cold dead fingers when lead is outlawed --- only outlaws will have lead carry on folks, mileage will vary oh I almost forgot the vol-in-tary lead --- turn in program ----- coming soon in your hood
Lone Dog, SASS #20401 Posted December 19, 2013 Posted December 19, 2013 Over a decade ago SASS, looking into the future, commissioned a study on the viability of frangibles for our game. I do not recall all the results but IIRC the main problem was the tendency of frangibles to crumble during the reloading process. That was a deal breaker. Other properties of frangibles were very positive. Most especially the way they just go poof on steel and there is ZERO backsplash aka splatter aka shrapnel. It is way past time to allow their use in our game. The crumbling while reloading problem I am thinking has since those early days been overcome today. There were no other downsides that I can recall. On a related note self healing soft polymer targets need to be looked at very hard and seriously. Splat is good as clang to me. YMMV,
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.