Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Alec Baldwin


Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, T.K. said:

If all he was doing was "pointing the gun to get the proper camera angle" as he stated ealier in the case, why did he cock the gun?

 

1) ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED

2) NEVER POINT YOUR GUN AT ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY

3) NEVER PLACE YOUR FINGER ON THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOU HAVE MADE A CONSCIENCE DECISION TO FIRE.

 

The FBI tried and was unable to get the actual gun to fire WITHOUT pulling the trigger. Their forensic analasys indicated there were no internal modifications or damaged  peices.

 

ALEC LIED. HE HAD TO PULL THE TrIGGER!

 If those rules were followed there would never be a film with firearms. This is movie making.

 

Best Wishes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, John Kloehr said:

Probably back in the B&W days.

 

No idea which movie, but a bunch of cowboys move to cover behind a hill (dirt pile). As they run up, one lets a round loose into the dirt. Oops. It clearly was not a blank.

Back when I was reading "Guns of the Old West" magazine, the guy that knew all the OLD Cowboy stars was telling a story about Harry Carey Sr. and a guy he worked with a lot, Pardner Jones. He was telling about, among other things, Pardner Jones job in movies back then was to shoot at the rocks near the other actors to create ricochets. 

1 hour ago, John Kloehr said:

This death was a big oops. Those who make Hollywood policy need to go to NRA basics classes.

You need to remember that most Hollywierd "stars" think that they ALREADY know everything that they need to because they are "better" than the rest of us. And because of the aforementioned "rules" that they follow, the actor HAS no responsibility for the guns condition and are actually forbidden to check. 

People like us know gun safety rules. These people think that they don't apply to them because once again, they're better than us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the beginning of this mess old interviews with Baldwin had him saying that when he is involved in a movie one of sets of skills he brings to the table is his experience and expertise with firearms/ firearms handling. Along with many other skills. Producer and actor both. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smokin Gator SASS #29736 said:

At the beginning of this mess old interviews with Baldwin had him saying that when he is involved in a movie one of sets of skills he brings to the table is his experience and expertise with firearms/ firearms handling. Along with many other skills. Producer and actor both. 

Well he’s always been a crock of you know what!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Texas Jack Black said:

 If those rules were followed there would never be a film with firearms. This is movie making.

 

Best Wishes

 

If they made George Clooney and Sandra Bollock fly around in space without doing it for real, they can convince me people are shooting at each other without pointing real guns at each other.   No film should ever be made with a real firearm, especially not in the 21st Century.  There is no reason for someone to die to make a film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, El Chapo said:

 

If they made George Clooney and Sandra Bollock fly around in space without doing it for real, they can convince me people are shooting at each other without pointing real guns at each other.   No film should ever be made with a real firearm, especially not in the 21st Century.  There is no reason for someone to die to make a film.

 No reason to have motor cycles, bikes ,swimming pools etc. All are dangerous and we all need to use airsoft fake guns in all the shooting sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, El Chapo said:

 

If they made George Clooney and Sandra Bollock fly around in space without doing it for real, they can convince me people are shooting at each other without pointing real guns at each other.   No film should ever be made with a real firearm, especially not in the 21st Century.  There is no reason for someone to die to make a film.

If they can make me believe that a long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, humans and aliens flew spaceships and fought with laser swords...:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owner or Pietta Firearms, Alessandro Pietta is testifying right now in the trial on Court TV. I don't watch that stuff, but my gal does. His testimony is actually quite interesting and (IMO) damning to Baldwin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Cypress Sun said:

The owner or Pietta Firearms, Alessandro Pietta is testifying right now in the trial on Court TV. I don't watch that stuff, but my gal does. His testimony is actually quite interesting and (IMO) damning to Baldwin.

I heard that the defense has admitted now that Baldwin pulled the trigger. I wasn’t watching but someone I know was and saw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2024 at 7:56 PM, T.K. said:

 

ALEC LIED. HE HAD TO PULL THE TrIGGER!

I am not defending Baldwin, but as my grandpa the judge used to say, truth comes with a point of view.  We all know he had to have pulled the trigger.  A single action simply won’t fire any other way without being broken, damaged, or modified to do so.   The FBI has verified all three of those did not happen.  
He probably believes that he didn’t pull the trigger.  Thus not lying, he doesn’t know that his memory of the event is not what actually happened and the actual events should come out during the trial.  Ie he made the gun fire by pulling the trigger and pulling back the hammer, with a loaded round and pointed at a person, killing them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Still hand Bill said:

I am not defending Baldwin, but as my grandpa the judge used to say, truth comes with a point of view.  We all know he had to have pulled the trigger.  A single action simply won’t fire any other way without being broken, damaged, or modified to do so.   The FBI has verified all three of those did not happen.  
He probably believes that he didn’t pull the trigger.  Thus not lying, he doesn’t know that his memory of the event is not what actually happened and the actual events should come out during the trial.  Ie he made the gun fire by pulling the trigger and pulling back the hammer, with a loaded round and pointed at a person, killing them.  

He may not have intentionally pulled the trigger, but he did pull it. After pointing it at someone. With the hammer cocked. Not treating the firearm as if it was loaded.

 

This last item is why he is guilty of manslaughter,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw on the internet a clip if him abruptly walking out of the courtroom and coming back in with a cup of coffee! Strange isn’t it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My gal made me watch a clip of that this morning. Sheer arrogance...and I guarantee that the jury noticed it.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, John Kloehr said:

He may not have intentionally pulled the trigger, but he did pull it. After pointing it at someone. With the hammer cocked. Not treating the firearm as if it was loaded.

 

This last item is why he is guilty of manslaughter,

this is my thinking as well , all the rephrasing , spinning and actor-hype aside 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rye Miles #13621 said:

I saw on the internet a clip if him abruptly walking out of the courtroom and coming back in with a cup of coffee! Strange isn’t it?


 

Old guys gotta pee occasionally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not aware that defendants could just get up and walk out of a courtroom anytime they wanted to. Was this during a recess break in the proceedings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge just dismissed charges against Baldwin! 🤨
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-sends-jury-home-alec-172738702.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prosecution withheld evidence consisting of a box of bullets. Judge dismissed the case "with prejudice", meaning it cannot be retried. Now my question is what does that do to the case against Thell Reid's daughter?  If I were her attorneys I'd be moving to clear her for the same reason. OTOH, I wonder if the family of the victim can still sue Baldwin for negligent homicide or whatever? :unsure::wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think maybe Baldwin paid the judge off?? Hmmmm..,,just a thought 🤫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rye Miles #13621 said:

Think maybe Baldwin paid the judge off?? Hmmmm..,,just a thought 🤫

 I said when this all started he would walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rye Miles #13621 said:

Think maybe Baldwin paid the judge off?? Hmmmm..,,just a thought 🤫

 

I don't think so, the judge looked REAL PISSED OFF at the prosecution but really had no choice.

 

Everyone on the prosecution team, whether in court or not, should be fired immediately.

2 minutes ago, Texas Jack Black said:

 I said when this all started he would walk.

 

So did I, stated that here in the Saloon as a matter of fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cypress Sun said:

 

I don't think so, the judge looked REAL PISSED OFF at the prosecution but really had no choice.

 

Everyone on the prosecution team, whether in court or not, should be fired immediately.

 

So did I, stated that here in the Saloon as a matter of fact.

 Yes you did.

 Best Wishes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys didn’t really believe he’d do any time on this thing, did you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yul Lose said:

You guys didn’t really believe he’d do any time on this thing, did you? 

I was hoping!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rye Miles #13621 said:

I was hoping!!

Most people were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s a bullcrap decision. It’s a technicality in my non lawyer opinion, Baldwin still killed someone and he’s going to walk. What a shame! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Rye Miles #13621 said:

It’s a technicality


Oh, you hit one of my triggers!

 

Yes, it's a technicality, and thank GAWD for those technicalities.  Do I like the decision?   No.  But, by Vulcan's left nut! I want every one of those "technicalities."  I want the omnipotent State to have to follow every comma, every jot and tittle of the law.  I want every obstruction possible to the terrible power of the State. Because one day I, myself, may need to avail myself of those "technicalities."  I want the State to have to follow the law EXACTLY the same way I have to.

What shortcuts would you allow the State to take around the law?   

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Subdeacon Joe said:


Oh, you hit one of my triggers!

 

Yes, it's a technicality, and thank GAWD for those technicalities.  Do I like the decision?   No.  But, by Vulcan's left nut! I want every one of those "technicalities."  I want the omnipotent State to have to follow every comma, every jot and tittle of the law.  I want every obstruction possible to the terrible power of the State. Because one day I, myself, may need to avail myself of those "technicalities."  I want the State to have to follow the law EXACTLY the same way I have to.

What shortcuts would you allow the State to take around the law?   

I doubt that anyone will disagree on your point. The aggravation comes from the fact that a leftist, gun hating, Hollywierd type is getting away with what amounts to murder. Any of us would have been shot, hanged, castrated and boiled in oil if we had done the same. 

He's going to just go about his happy little life doing whatever he wants while an Innocent is dead for something that so easily have been avoided if he'd have followed the rules that those of us that respect our guns do everyday. 

If it was indeed a technicality that let him off, whoever is responsible for that should be stripped of whatever legal standing they have. Unfortunately, that probably won't happen either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter must be envious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 said:

doubt that anyone will disagree on your point. The aggravation comes from the fact that a leftist, gun hating, Hollywierd type is getting away with what amounts to murder

 

Well, negligent homicide.   As I said,  I don't like the decision,  and for exactly the reasons you mentioned. But I would rather have him walk than have a judge say that the State and its agents don't have to play by the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.