Waco Jim Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 Regarding the rules for re-shoots. In my RO1 & II classes, I was taught that proper coaching or no coaching at all is not considered RO interference and would never be grounds for a re-shoot. The Shooters Handbook at that time (2011) states that very clearly. The current Shooters Handbook is not clear on what is or is not RO interference. Have the rules changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 Quote Proper coaching or no coaching at all is NOT considered RO interference and will never be grounds for a reshoot. SHB p.18 Quote Reshoots are not awarded for ammunition or firearm malfunctions. However, if there is a range failure (failure of props, timer failure/unrecorded time, or Range Officer interference) beyond the competitor’s control, a reshoot may be granted. SHB p.20 ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Jim Posted August 29, 2022 Author Share Posted August 29, 2022 Thanks PWB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlands Bob #61228 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 However, REALLY BAD coaching may be grounds for a reshoot, as far as I'm concerned. The Peanut Gallery has been known to cause problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bill Burt Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 11 minutes ago, Badlands Bob #61228 said: However, REALLY BAD coaching may be grounds for a reshoot, as far as I'm concerned. The Peanut Gallery has been known to cause problems. Why were you looking at @Krazy Kajunwhen you said that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlands Bob #61228 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, Captain Bill Burt said: Why were you looking at @Krazy Kajunwhen you said that? I did NOT mention any names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 Quote Proper Coaching vs. Improper Coaching - Proper coaching is not considered RO Interference and will never be grounds for a reshoot. - Improper coaching that either impedes the shooters progress or results in a procedural penalty may be grounds for a reshoot. - Any Procedural penalties are the responsibility of the shooter; an RO/TO who does NOT provide coaching, is not responsible for a shooter’s procedural penalties. NOT coaching does not waive any procedural penalties. RO1 p.9 Any input by the "peanut gallery" is NOT covered under the "Coaching" rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackalope Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 And if Krazy Kajun belongs anywhere, it's in the peanut gallery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tucker McNeely Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 All peanut gallery jokes aside, please discourage those comments. A procedural is less punishing than a SDQ or worse come from peanut gallery coaching. Let the TO assist the shooter. I know everyone wants the best for the shooter, but more than one person giving instructions to someone on the clock may cause a safety error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kajun Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 44 minutes ago, Captain Bill Burt said: Why were you looking at @Krazy Kajunwhen you said that? @Captain Bill Burtnow here ya go, speaking of comments from the peanut gallery...I see you sitting in the stands. @Badlands Bob #61228 I guess all that "encouragement" you gave me whilst I was shooting and you weren't the TO or a spotter was well intentioned peanut gallery advice! I agree, peanut gallery advice is worth what you paid for it....nothing. If you ain't holding the timer or a spotting stick just sit back and watch the action....unless there is a genuinely dangerous safety situation unfolding. Kajun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Devil Dale Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 1 hour ago, Badlands Bob #61228 said: However, REALLY BAD coaching may be grounds for a reshoot, as far as I'm concerned. The Peanut Gallery has been known to cause problems. The rule is specific to "proper coaching or no coaching at all" for good reason. Improper coaching or direction, for example, a T.O. mistakenly telling a shooter to cease fire certainly is grounds for a reshoot (and an apology). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 2 hours ago, Krazy Kajun said: If you ain't holding the timer or a spotting stick just sit back and watch the action Okay...now I'm going to have to go back and look at the rules...ugh... Originally it was grounds for a reshoot if any Stage Official gave incorrect instructions. That included Counters and even the score keeper if I recall. Then they were going to/supposed to...change that to only the TO can give incorrect instructions that warrant a reshoot. Aaaaaaand away I go to the rules...deep dive time!!! Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 UNIT 8: Match Positions & Roles All match positions covered in this lesson are considered Range Officers. Each position serves a critical function to the fair, efficient, and SAFE execution of a match. Match Director Range Master Match RO Posse Marshal Deputy Posse Marshal Timer Operator (TO) Expeditor (XP) Officer Spotters Score Keeper Loading Table Officer Unloading Table Officer Berm Marshal All these are considered "Range Officers". The Shooter's Handbook says: Reshoots are not awarded for ammunition or firearm malfunctions. However, if there is a range failure (failure of props, timer failure/unrecorded time, or Range Officer interference) beyond the competitor’s control, a reshoot may be granted. So...I'm confuzaled... Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hells Comin Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 With all those range officers There's no one left to shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennessee williams Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 I forget exactly what the conversation was a few months ago, but EVERYBODY is considered a safety officer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kajun Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 26 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: UNIT 8: Match Positions & Roles All match positions covered in this lesson are considered Range Officers. Each position serves a critical function to the fair, efficient, and SAFE execution of a match. Match Director Range Master Match RO Posse Marshal Deputy Posse Marshal Timer Operator (TO) Expeditor (XP) Officer Spotters Score Keeper Loading Table Officer Unloading Table Officer Berm Marshal All these are considered "Range Officers". The Shooter's Handbook says: Reshoots are not awarded for ammunition or firearm malfunctions. However, if there is a range failure (failure of props, timer failure/unrecorded time, or Range Officer interference) beyond the competitor’s control, a reshoot may be granted. So...I'm confuzaled... Phantom Oy Kajun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 8 minutes ago, Tennessee williams said: I forget exactly what the conversation was a few months ago, but EVERYBODY is considered a safety officer... Yes...but these are specifically called out as Range Officers. Now yes, it does say: "...match positions covered in this lesson...". But I've looked to find where there is a specific definition of Range Officer and can't seem to find it (doesn't mean it's not there...I just didn't see it). I did see where in the Handbook Match RO was defined...but not simply Range Officer. I'm sure someone schmart will help me out. Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennessee williams Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 8 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: Yes...but these are specifically called out as Range Officers. Now yes, it does say: "...match positions covered in this lesson...". But I've looked to find where there is a specific definition of Range Officer and can't seem to find it (doesn't mean it's not there...I just didn't see it). I did see where in the Handbook Match RO was defined...but not simply Range Officer. I'm sure someone schmart will help me out. Phantom Seems like TO/CRO(chief range officer) is used synonymous somewhere. Without me getting my book out. Seems like the conversation a few months ago was about someone yelling stop or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 Just now, Tennessee williams said: Seems like TO/CRO(chief range officer) is used synonymous somewhere. Without me getting my book out. Seems like the conversation a few months ago was about someone yelling stop or something like that. Back in...2020...ish, the handbook defined stage officers as including Spotters and Score Keeper. Some of my terminology might be off. But at any rate, if any of these Stage Officers give a bad instruction (such as which target to engage when a shooter is "lost"), that was grounds for a reshoot. I think that was supposed to have been changed because the intent of the rule makers was that only the Timer Operator can give incorrect instructions that can lead to a reshoot. Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted August 29, 2022 Share Posted August 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: Back in...2020...ish, the handbook defined stage officers as including Spotters and Score Keeper. Some of my terminology might be off. But at any rate, if any of these Stage Officers give a bad instruction (such as which target to engage when a shooter is "lost"), that was grounds for a reshoot. I think that was supposed to have been changed because the intent of the rule makers was that only the Timer Operator can give incorrect instructions that can lead to a reshoot. Phantom Currently, the only specific references to "COACHING" are listed in the Timer Operator duties. I've suggested adding the term "Line RO's" (TO & Spotters) as those Range Officers are immediately involved with the shooter during stage engagement. REF: SHB p.18 REF: RO1 pp.7-10 REF: RO2 p.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 I’d think as this rule refers to “a range officer” impedes shooter would mean TO, counters, scorekeeper. If one of them gave improper coaching then reshoot would be in order(but not if safety rules was broken, like MOVE after pistol cocked and shooter moved yo another location with cocked gun) No reshoots/restarts will be given after the first shot goes downrange as determined by the TO and Match Director – EXCEPT for: - Prop or match equipment failure - A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter (RO Interference) - Timer failure or unrecorded time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 I agree with TO and Spotters (whose duties include watching for proper stage/target engagement, as well as counting shots fired) The scorekeeper is NOT included in what I would call "Line ROs" unless also acting as a Spotter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 6 minutes ago, Hoss said: A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter (RO Interference) But it doesn't say "A Range Officer". It says "Range Officer". Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 1 minute ago, PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L said: I agree with TO and Spotters (whose duties include watching for proper stage/target engagement, as well as counting shots fired) The scorekeeper is NOT included in what I would call "Line ROs" unless also acting as a Spotter. And I agree with you But I think the rule wording needs some refinement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 1 minute ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: And I agree with you But I think the rule wording needs some refinement. Agreed! It obviously is in need of further clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 41 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: But it doesn't say "A Range Officer". It says "Range Officer". Phantom This line copied directly from RO I manual A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itchy Trigger Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 But, since all are "Safety Officers," if there is an issue (squib, person/cow down range, range cease fire, etc.) and a non "Range Officer" yells out for the shooter to stop, they should stop. The "TO" should confirm the command, but even if it wasn't, if it caused the shooter to pause his actions (as he probably should) shouldn't a reshoot be offered? I have seen this more than once on potential squibs. Rulebook "Every participant in a SASS match is expected to be a safety officer. Each shooter’s first responsibility is for his or her own safe conduct. All shooters are expected to remain alert for actions by others that are unsafe. Any Range Officer or shooter may confront any participant about an observed, unsafe situation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Hoss said: This line copied directly from RO I manual A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter That's not the rule, but an example. Pretty sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 28 minutes ago, Itchy Trigger said: But, since all are "Safety Officers," if there is an issue (squib, person/cow down range, range cease fire, etc.) and a non "Range Officer" yells out for the shooter to stop, they should stop. The "TO" should confirm the command, but even if it wasn't, if it caused the shooter to pause his actions (as he probably should) shouldn't a reshoot be offered? I have seen this more than once on potential squibs. Rulebook "Every participant in a SASS match is expected to be a safety officer. Each shooter’s first responsibility is for his or her own safe conduct. All shooters are expected to remain alert for actions by others that are unsafe. Any Range Officer or shooter may confront any participant about an observed, unsafe situation." Just doesn't work that way. Perhaps the most common Safety Violation called by "non-stage officials" would be breaking the 170. Basically crazy gun handling...drinking alcohol...dropping acid...speaking to imaginary friends...that might warrant non-stage officials to make a "safety" call... If you are not a Stage Officer and you yell Squib and there turns out not to be one, the shooter will not get a reshoot. Yelling "STOP" is not a good thing...with exceptions of course. If I see little Bobby running down range and I'm just sitting around not working the posse, then hell yeah I'm yelling CEASE FIRE! Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 10 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: That's not the rule, but an example. Pretty sure It’s cut and pasted directly from the manual No reshoots/restarts will be given after the first shot goes downrange as determined by the TO and Match Director – EXCEPT for:- Prop or match equipment failure- A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter (RO Interference)- Timer failure or unrecorded time i would think the “A” Range Officer” would mean there is more than one. but what do I know… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, Hoss said: It’s cut and pasted directly from the manual No reshoots/restarts will be given after the first shot goes downrange as determined by the TO and Match Director – EXCEPT for:- Prop or match equipment failure- A Range Officer impeded the progress of the shooter (RO Interference)- Timer failure or unrecorded time i would think the “A” Range Officer” would mean there is more than one. but what do I know… I'll let the linguistic experts opine on the last comment... And yes Hoss, I'm aware that you "Cut and Pasted" the referenced line. Can you please show me the definition of "Range Officer"? Thanks! Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itchy Trigger Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 21 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: Just doesn't work that way. It sounds like a contradiction in the rules to me. If any "shooter" can "confront" any "participant" about an "unsafe situation", then the shooter should LISTEN, especially if in the middle of fire. I guarantee you if someone yells cease fire, I will stop shooting until I decide that it is safe to continue shooting. I would much rather take a time penalty than shoot little Bobby. In reality, the TO will probably tell the shooter to stop until they can also determine if it is safe to continue. "Any Range Officer or shooter may confront any participant about an observed, unsafe situation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 11 minutes ago, Phantom, SASS #54973 said: I'll let the linguistic experts opine on the last comment... And yes Hoss, I'm aware that you "Cut and Pasted" the referenced line. Can you please show me the definition of "Range Officer"? Thanks! Phantom I’m in agreement that the manual is not 100% clear on this. But in my mind the rule as written definitely indicates their is more than one RO on the stage. Maybe as PWB has indicated the TO & spotters should be considered LINE OFFICERS and listed as such in manuals to avoid any confusion. if I’m TO and I feel shooter was impeded by improper coaching by me or a spotter I’m going to give shooter the benefit of the doubt and offer a reshoot. I know that you (and others) think it would be best for TO to give no coaching. Not sure I agree with that, but I will agree you have the right yo that opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 17 minutes ago, Itchy Trigger said: It sounds like a contradiction in the rules to me. If any "shooter" can "confront" any "participant" about an "unsafe situation", then the shooter should LISTEN, especially if in the middle of fire. I guarantee you if someone yells cease fire, I will stop shooting until I decide that it is safe to continue shooting. I would much rather take a time penalty than shoot little Bobby. In reality, the TO will probably tell the shooter to stop until they can also determine if it is safe to continue. "Any Range Officer or shooter may confront any participant about an observed, unsafe situation." Well if you want to focus on the Cease Fire command...we can do that. My response was to your general comment regarding calling safety "commands". Practical understanding of the rules is important. Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom, SASS #54973 Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 18 minutes ago, Hoss said: I’m in agreement that the manual is not 100% clear on this. But in my mind the rule as written definitely indicates their is more than one RO on the stage. Maybe as PWB has indicated the TO & spotters should be considered LINE OFFICERS and listed as such in manuals to avoid any confusion. if I’m TO and I feel shooter was impeded by improper coaching by me or a spotter I’m going to give shooter the benefit of the doubt and offer a reshoot. I know that you (and others) think it would be best for TO to give no coaching. Not sure I agree with that, but I will agree you have the right yo that opinion. Right now, if a Range Officer impedes...that includes more than just the TO and Spotters. This is the whole point of discussion. There is no definition of "Range Officer" being a specific person and I know that the ROC wanted to limit the ability for a shooter to get a reshoot because of improper coaching to only the TO. As far as removing all coaching...well...I would say that the argument in favor of my position has some precedence. We use to allow TO's to stop a long gun from falling...wasn't fair because some TO's were good and able to do this...some not so much. "We" wanted more even...uniformed performance. So...we now have what we have. But...this is another argument for another day. Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.