Dutch Coroner Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3589/text Apparently this bill would prevent any 3 or more people from training with firearms or any other type of self defense tactics which may cause bodily injury. This insanity is never going to stop is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chantry Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Yes. And just because a bill is proposed doesn't mean it is going to go anywhere. This won't be the first congress critter to propose a bill just to prove he "did something". There was one IL congress critter who proposed a bill banning handguns for years that never went anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch Coroner Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 12 minutes ago, Chantry said: Yes. And just because a bill is proposed doesn't mean it is going to go anywhere. This won't be the first congress critter to propose a bill just to prove he "did something". There was one IL congress critter who proposed a bill banning handguns for years that never went anywhere. I’m aware of that but I mean sheesh…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eyesa Horg Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 We need a Pi&&3D off emoji. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowderRiverCowboy Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Ohh It goes way farther than that . SASS will cease to exist dont go hunting with buddies in another state either . Circumstances.—The circumstances described in this subsection are that the conduct described in subsection (a)— “(1) involves— “(A) travel across a State line or national border; or “(B) the use of the channels, facilities, or instrumentalities of interstate or foreign commerce; “(2) involves a firearm, explosive or incendiary device, or dangerous weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; “(3) involves the use of ammunition or a large capacity ammunition feeding device that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; “(4) obstructs, delays, or affects interstate or foreign commerce; or “(5) occurs wholly within any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Markey is and has always been an ass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rye Miles #13621 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 For a long while I followed legislation getting proposed in NH. A lot of the real crap just gets tabled as ITL (inexpediemt to legislate ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassnetguy50 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Also see HR6981. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Just one more step on the tyranny ladder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 42 minutes ago, sassnetguy50 said: Also see HR6981. Huh? https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/6981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassnetguy50 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassnetguy50 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 7 minutes ago, Pat Riot said: Huh? https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/6981 Try the 118th congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6981/text/ih?overview=closed&format=xml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 26 minutes ago, sassnetguy50 said: Try the 118th congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6981/text/ih?overview=closed&format=xml There we go. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Both these bills are an absolute affront to the Bill of Rights in general. I wonder how far they’ll get? The backers and the people in politics that come up with these things time and time again have shown themselves to be very un-American yet they stay in power because of a number of things, but mostly because they have a blind, manipulated population of people that keep them there in power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eyesa Horg Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Saw on Yahoo news today, supposedly 23 Republicans plan to retire or resign. Wonderful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassnetguy50 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Surprised they didn't label it an anti terrorism bill. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/National-Strategy-for-Countering-Domestic-Terrorism.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seamus McGillicuddy Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 Much of what this seeks to prohibit is already illegal. The rest appears to be blatantly unconstitutional. Seamus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Dan Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 This will also make it illegal for churches to have the right to have security. They will keep chipping away until they have us all defenseless. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip Snorter Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 1 minute ago, Deadshot Dan said: This will also make it illegal for churches to have the right to have security. They will keep chipping away until they have us all defenseless. Why? Power and greed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.