Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Haven't had time to read the opinions yet: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/us/second-amendment-concealed-carry.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Lots of coverage on the Team Sass page. I will say, though, that it fills me with a sense of shame for my home state.
Subdeacon Joe Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 Read the ruling here: https://cdn.firearmspolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2016-6-9-peruta-richards-enbanc-opinion.pdfsee also the TEAM SASS forum.
Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted June 9, 2016 Author Posted June 9, 2016 Lots of coverage on the Team Sass page. I will say, though, that it fills me with a sense of shame for my home state. Worrisome for all of us in the 9th Circuit, even if our states (such as Washington) have good concealed-carry laws-- for the time being. Washington State, for all of its political "liberalism" (a misnomer in my opinion, but that's another story) has good firearms laws, and a strong constitutional firearms provision. We've been a "shall issue" state for concealed-carry since at least 1959. But there are hostile forces gathering that want to change that; they have an incremental strategy.
Trailrider #896 Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 The 9th Circuit is known for its liberal bias. I have no doubt this will eventually wind up in the SCOTUS. Problem with that is that much will depend on what kind of judge will replace the late Justice Scolia. That, of course, will depend on who the next president is, and whether Congress will confirm, which in turn depends on the results of the Congressional elections this fall!
Yul Lose Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 Can't say I'm surprised. The 9th is known for decisions like this. If folks don't see the importance of the presidential election this fall we're in trouble.
Augustus Goodnight Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 They don't call it the 9th Circus Court" for nothing. The most overturned court in the nation.
Muleshoe Bill SASS #67022 Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 Kinda makes you suspect their logic is flawed. Bless their little hearts.
Rye Miles #13621 Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 They're in direct conflict with the Heller decision by the SCOTUS, why do they think they can out rule the law of the land??
Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L Posted June 10, 2016 Posted June 10, 2016 Glad this is moved to Team SASS. Now can say.....if Hillary is elected she will appoint very anti-2nd Amendment zealots - vote wisely. GG ~
Rye Miles #13621 Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 Glad this is moved to Team SASS. Now can say.....if Hillary is elected she will appoint very anti-2nd Amendment zealots - vote wisely. GG ~ You are 100% correct Mr. Gatlin, now we have to convince the RINO republicans to get behind Trump. Like him or not he's a thousand times better than Hillary!
Yul Lose Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 IMHO, a large number of RINO's have had their heads handed to them and many of them are to blinded to see the danger of another Clinton presidency.
Dantankerous Posted June 11, 2016 Posted June 11, 2016 ...the danger of another Clinton presidency. That ain't just dangerous. It's a nightmare, a disaster in the making.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.