Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

What's the correct call?


Long Branch Louie

Recommended Posts

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target. Simple enough. A shooter jacked a round out on his rifle string, proceeded to load two, then shoot his make-up round and the bonus target. Several of us thought that should be a procedural because he should have loaded his makeup round, took the shot, then loaded his bonus round, ie., two reloads. His case was the stage didn't say when you had to shoot the bonus so it didn't matter. But the instructions said shoot 9 shots on three tatgets, reload one and shoot the bonus target. To me that means he couldn't load both his makeup shot and the bonus shot at the same time. What say you??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target. Simple enough. A shooter jacked a round out on his rifle string, proceeded to load two, then shoot his make-up round and the bonus target. Several of us thought that should be a procedural because he should have loaded his makeup round, took the shot, then loaded his bonus round, ie., two reloads. His case was the stage didn't say when you had to shoot the bonus so it didn't matter. But the instructions said shoot 9 shots on three tatgets, reload one and shoot the bonus target. To me that means he couldn't load both his makeup shot and the bonus shot at the same time. What say you??

 

 

NO CALL

 

KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No call, but this sort of thing should have been caught on the posse leader walk through, where potential issues and the intent of the stage writer may be divined, if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't specifically prohibited in the stage instructions then the reload could have been done at anytime.

 

No Call....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't specifically prohibited in the stage instructions then the reload could have been done at anytime.

 

No Call....

 

 

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target.

 

 

What part of this isn't clear as when to reload for the bonus ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instructions said shoot nine targets THEN reload! Did he do that?

 

Blackfoot

 

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target.

IF that is how the stage was written, the call would be a "P"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target.

 

 

What part of this isn't clear as when to reload for the bonus ?

That one is perfectly clear. THEN is the operative word of intent and it's specific enough.I just re=read the OP. The OP says "THEN"..... I'll change my "NO CALL" to a "P".

 

GET A ROPE!;)/>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I stated in the first post, it did clearly say put nine shots on three targets, reload one and shoot the bonus target. Because it said reload one AFTER the nine shot string, that's why I felt it should be a "P"....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I stated in the first post, it did clearly say put nine shots on three targets, reload one and shoot the bonus target. Because it said reload one AFTER the nine shot string, that's why I felt it should be a "P"....

Well, now you've changed it.... so which was it? Was the "AFTER" you are saying now in the instructions? The shooter did, in fact, reload one AND he shot the bonus AFTER. Where in the preceding sentence does it say THEN reload or AFTER the nine shots are placed THEN reload?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one is perfectly clear. THEN is the operative word of intent and it's specific enough.I just re=read the OP. The OP says "THEN"..... I'll change my "NO CALL" to a "P".

 

GET A ROPE!;)/>/>

 

 

No rope for you buddy, you gotta stay & suffer with the rest of us :lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target. Simple enough. A shooter jacked a round out on his rifle string, proceeded to load two, then shoot his make-up round and the bonus target. Several of us thought that should be a procedural because he should have loaded his makeup round, took the shot, then loaded his bonus round, ie., two reloads. His case was the stage didn't say when you had to shoot the bonus so it didn't matter. But the instructions said shoot 9 shots on three tatgets, reload one and shoot the bonus target. To me that means he couldn't load both his makeup shot and the bonus shot at the same time. What say you??

 

I DISAGREE that this should be a Procedural pealty or a "P".

 

I think it is a "No Call".

 

The shooter has the option to reload a round jacked out of the weapon whenever he wishes. He did that and at the same time loaded the "bonus" cartridge.

 

Nowhere above in the quoted stage design does it state specifically that he is not allowed to do that and if it doesn't specifically address this issue, then the shooter gets the benefit of any doubt.

 

In this case, this specific scenario was not thought of and included in the stage design as being "illegal". The original stage design says nothing about when a make-up round must be loaded and fired. The shooter did fire his first 9 shots as required, prior to shooting the bonus. Therefore, I believe any reasonable shooter, without sepcific instructions to the contrary (as the OP is stated here, the instructions do not meet the test of "reasonable"), the shooter wins all questionable calls. The instruction, "then" (regarding the bonus cartridge), would be acceptable if there were no make-up cartridges to be loaded and in this case, the term is simply a qualifier to state that the bonus shot occurs at the end.

 

Hinging a 10-second penalty on the word "then," in the heat of battle and with no specific stage instructions clarifiying such a circumstance of when to load a jacked-out round, when under normal circumstances, the shooter may do so anytime, is just wrong, in my opinion. If the shooter realized he'd have to load in two separate steps it would be a better option for the shooter to take a miss for the jacked-out cartridge.

 

Cat Brules

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stage instructions in the OP "called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target."

 

The shooter had the OPTION to replace the ejected round and fire the 9th shot BEFORE reloading the round for the bonus target.

 

Shooter also had the OPTION to take the MISS for the ejected round and reload a round for the bonus target.

 

Shooter did neither of these...resulting in a PROCEDURAL for failure to shoot the stage as directed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is sad that a simple act such as fixing a ejected round should be joined with a sequential target selection to create a P for a shooter who already is out of sorts due to ejecting a round.

 

I don't think that the "then" should really be interpreted this way.

Yet pwb has ruled.

 

If this was my zoo, the call would be "no call"

A gun handling question here would a shooter really load one round shoot one round and the load another round to complete a shooting sequence.

 

just my useless 2 cents worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stage instructions in the OP "called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target."

 

The shooter had the OPTION to replace the ejected round and fire the 9th shot BEFORE reloading the round for the bonus target.

 

Shooter also had the OPTION to take the MISS for the ejected round and reload a round for the bonus target.

 

Shooter did neither of these...resulting in a PROCEDURAL for failure to shoot the stage as directed.

 

I continue to disagree that making a Procedural call for this original topic scenario is correct.

 

Personally, I think calling a Procedural ("P") on this one is like setting a trap for the shooter. Again, I believe it goes beyond being reasonable and acceptable and as such, takes on the mantle of being a poorly-written stage and raises a doubt. I believe the shooter should get the benefit of such doubts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I continue to disagree that making a Procedural call for this original topic scenario is correct.

 

Personally, I think calling a Procedural ("P") on this one is like setting a trap for the shooter. It goes beyound the pale (no pun) of being reasonable and acceptable and as such, takes on the mantle of being a poorly-written stage and raises a doubt. I believe the shooter should get the benefit of such doubts.

 

Reloading a round to replace the ejected round and firing it is necessary to complete the first part of the rifle shooting sequence ("...nine shots..."). According to the specific stage instructions, that MUST be done prior to loading an additional round for the bonus target.

 

There is NO DOUBT that the shooter did otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO...it is NOT a "poorly written stage"...the shooter handled his rifle "poorly" (i.e. ejecting a round mid-string); as well as making an error in remedying that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, now you've changed it.... so which was it? Was the "AFTER" you are saying now in the instructions? The shooter did, in fact, reload one AND he shot the bonus AFTER. Where in the preceding sentence does it say THEN reload or AFTER the nine shots are placed THEN reload?

Brother King, I changed nothing, there was not a "then" in the instructions, it clearly stated "load one round and shoot the bonus" after completing the string. Cat, I got to agree with Pale Wolf because that's what I thought also. It's the SHOOTER's fault he jacked out a round, but IMHO, he is making up some time by going ahead and loading two. BTW, no penalty was assessed, I just wanted to learn in case it happened in another match, maybe like a State.

Marauder, Sorry you think it was stupid, I guess I'll stick with RRR's opinion, he DOES shoot here and it is a fine match run by fine folks...I didn't write the stage, just trying to learn something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO...it is NOT a "poorly written stage"...the shooter handled his rifle "poorly" (i.e. ejecting a round mid-string); as well as making an error in remedying that situation.

 

Well, I suppose we've said what we have to say regarding this issue. This being a forum, that's what it's about and, opinions vary.

 

So, on to the next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I am in doubt about things like this, I try to simplify them to make things more clear. As the real question is when the round for the bonus target can be loaded, forget about the jacked round. So the question becomes, given the instructions above, shooter picks up his rifle reloading one before firing a single shot, then puts nine on three and one on the bonus.

 

Seems like a clear P to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to seem like a Dofus on this matter but the instructions said: "We had a stage today that the rifle portion called for nine shots on three targets then reload one and shoot a bonus target..." Very straight-forward. The then was certainly spelled out in the original post, duh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brother King, I changed nothing, there was not a "then" in the instructions, it clearly stated "load one round and shoot the bonus" after completing the string.

Now wait just a minute...you just dramatically changed the OP which quite clearly says "THEN*

PWB's ruling specificslly refers to IF "THEN".

If what you are now saying is accurate THEN...I retract my re-considered call of "P".

 

NO CALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO...it is NOT a "poorly written stage"...the shooter handled his rifle "poorly" (i.e. ejecting a round mid-string); as well as making an error in remedying that situation.

 

God Bless!

 

 

RRR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am new here and not familiar with how things are done yet but unless your shooting for money I do not see why it matters. Are you mad because your meaningless 12th place finished was destroyed by his actions? If your shooting for bragging rights and he bucked you down one place then say you came out it 12th place but it could of been 11th if some guys had done it the way I thought it was supposed to be.

 

If the judge did not disqualify him then he did it right. If you have a complaint then take it up with the judge and rule maker and make sure next time it is more defined.

 

I am under the impression this sport is about the spirit of the game. If it was not decided at the time it happened then complaining about it later disqualifies you from the sport. Majority rule does not change how things should be.

 

Just a newbies opinion, don’t mean to hurt no feelings.

 

Bobby, no, not at all, chances are the poster was just a by stander and had no personal interest in the call, other than wanting to see that a fair call was made. I don't think anyone is complaining, simply trying to determine which was the right call, so that if the situation comes up again he'll know which way to rule. I like to follow these 'you make the call' posts, it makes me think, refer to the rule books, and hopefully helps us all to make uniformly fair calls.

 

Uniform calls on gray areas are important, if that was called a P by that posse, but not by all the rest, then it isn't fair to all shooters.

 

Grizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uniform calls on gray areas are important, if that was called a P by that posse, but not by all the rest, then it isn't fair to all shooters.

 

Grizz

 

Really if you spent 3000 bucks to go to NM an that call moved you from 1st to 12th. Evaone needs to sorta see it tha same, ye see.

 

 

RRR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be alittle crazy because I don't see where any 'benefit of doubt' plays any part in favor of the shooter.

 

THERE IS NO DOUBT.....he shot the stage different than the instructions allowed according to the ORIGINAL POST where the word 'THEN' is used which determined the sequences in which the firing and reloading was allowed. Therefore, a 'P' is earned.

 

That was in the ORIGINAL post.

 

The OP now seem to state that the word 'AFTER' was the actual word used and in my humble opinion, would make this a No Call.

 

 

..........Widder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be alittle crazy because I don't see where any 'benefit of doubt' plays any part in favor of the shooter.

 

THERE IS NO DOUBT.....he shot the stage different than the instructions allowed according to the ORIGINAL POST where the word 'THEN' is used which determined the sequences in which the firing and reloading was allowed. Therefore, a 'P' is earned.

 

That was in the ORIGINAL post.

 

The OP now seem to state that the word 'AFTER' was the actual word used and in my humble opinion, would make this a No Call.

 

 

..........Widder

To hell with humble opinions.... you're right. Say what you mean or the shooter is under no obligation to divine the stage writer's intent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a call, the exact stage wording is extremely important. Sometimes how it is read by the PM can change situations like this if the PM does not read the exact wording of the stage, and instead just summarizes it, not recommended but happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P, based on the wording in the original post...

 

It's not poorly written either to require a certain action to be performed and then another action is to be performed.

 

Fillmore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.