Subdeacon Joe Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Found on FB "A group of friends, some in Union military uniform, with one pointing a revolver, pose for the camera, 1860s." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steel-eye Steve SASS #40674 Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Starr double action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crooked River Pete, SASS 43485 Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Looks like a Starr to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long Fingers, SASS#56813 Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 What’s with the hand on one guys knee and the two guys holding hands? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpo Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 6 minutes ago, Long Fingers, SASS#56813 said: What’s with the hand on one guys knee and the two guys holding hands? They're Yankees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted April 14 Author Share Posted April 14 6 minutes ago, Long Fingers, SASS#56813 said: What’s with the hand on one guys knee and the two guys holding hands? Just friends. It wasn't until recently that our society developed its aversion to men displaying affection for one another. Still common in some cultures. To the question in the OP, I thought it was a Starr, but wasn't quite sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 hours ago, Long Fingers, SASS#56813 said: What’s with the hand on one guys knee and the two guys holding hands? 2 hours ago, Alpo said: They're Yankees. Yankee Sailors. And yep, it's a Starr. The pic seems reversed, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 You do a double take the first time you see wholly masculine men in Italy who are old friends, walking down the street hand in hand. And if you look at personal correspondence between friends in the 19th century you may be surprised at the expressions of emotion and affection. Only in our unfortunate time do folks now tend to read a sexual aspect into it, which in fact was completely absent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpo Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 42 minutes ago, Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 said: The pic sem reversed, though. It's a tin type. They are all reversed. That's why for years people thought Billy the kid was left-handed - the one absolutely known photo of him is a tin type. I would be more concerned with the fact that they're all wearing rouge than that a couple of them are holding hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duffield, SASS #23454 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 10 minutes ago, Alpo said: I would be more concerned with the fact that they're all wearing rouge than that a couple of them are holding hands. Pictures were a really big deal in those days. They would be made up to look like the picture of health, thus the rouge for rosy cheeks. The gun was probably a prop provided by the photographer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundog Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, Long Fingers, SASS#56813 said: What’s with the hand on one guys knee and the two guys holding hands? The guy with the hand on the knee was forced to do so by the other guy holding a gun to his head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, Red Gauntlet , SASS 60619 said: You do a double take the first time you see wholly masculine men in Italy who are old friends, walking down the street hand in hand. And if you look at personal correspondence between friends in the 19th century you may be surprised at the expressions of emotion and affection. Only in our unfortunate time do folks now tend to read a sexual aspect into it, which in fact was completely absent. Well said, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted April 15 Author Share Posted April 15 Sitting on knees, arm around another guy, etc. As Red commented, only in our unfortunate times in our society is a man showing affection for another man looked at as only sexual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abilene Slim SASS 81783 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, Alpo said: I would be more concerned with the fact that they're all wearing rouge than that a couple of them are holding hands. They’re not wearing rouge. That was added to the image after processing. Color tinting was an optional extra offered by photographers back then to make the B&W image more “lifelike”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 hours ago, Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 said: Yankee Sailors. And yep, it's a Starr. The pic seems reversed, though. Definitely not Sailors. Probably Soldiers or Marines. 2 hours ago, Alpo said: I would be more concerned with the fact that they're all wearing rouge than that a couple of them are holding hands. Ah! That settles it. Definitely Marines. Sailors don’t look to get photos taken on liberty. They’re were the booze and the girls are…not wearing rouge and holding hands with their foxhole sweethearts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpo Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, Abilene Slim SASS 81783 said: They’re not wearing rouge. That was added to the image after processing. Color tinting was an optional extra offered by photographers back then to make the B&W image more “lifelike”. I'm aware of that. I was making a funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.