Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Why are rimfire lever actions always front loading?


Orient Express

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm wondering there are no rimfire lever actions with a side loading gate like their centrefire cousins? Does it have to do with the rimfire cartridge or is it traditional?

Posted

Maybe because it's a heeled projectile and any sideways pressure will push it out of alignment, it's better to drop in a tube, or push against the rim for magazine feed.

Could also be due to size, not sure how easy it would be trying to feed those slippery little suckers into a side loading gate.

 Reddit has a few threads.

Good question 

Posted
1 hour ago, Orient Express said:

I'm wondering there are no rimfire lever actions with a side loading gate like their centrefire cousins? Does it have to do with the rimfire cartridge or is it traditional?

Always wondered that myself! 🧐

Posted

IMHO:

"Simplicity of Design".    Much, much easier to tube feed.

 

Another question that might answer the original question:   'Why do you think HENRY originally made their centerfire pistol caliber

rifles with NO loading gate?

Answer: simplicity of design.     Everybody complained about the NO GATE function and Henry complied with a gate.

 

Why do you suppose MARLIN made their .32 H&R magnum 1894 model with NO GATE?

 

If I were to design a good, reliable lever rifle today, I would seriously consider the NO GATE design.

 

..........Widder

 

 

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Widder, SASS #59054 said:

IMHO:

"Simplicity of Design".    Much, much easier to tube feed.

 

Another question that might answer the original question:   'Why do you think HENRY originally made their centerfire pistol caliber

rifles with NO loading gate?

Answer: simplicity of design.     Everybody complained about the NO GATE function and Henry complied with a gate.

 

Why do you suppose MARLIN made their .32 H&R magnum 1894 model with NO GATE?

 

If I were to design a good, reliable lever rifle today, I would seriously consider the NO GATE design.

 

..........Widder

 

 

 

Henry’s lever action was a .44 Rimfire as was the 1866. The 73 was the first with a centerfire round. The .44 Rimfire is kind like a big fat .22 😂😂😂

Posted

I seem to recall very early Marlin rimfire lever actions had a side loading port. I'm too lazy to look it up. I visited with an old gunsmith that had a Marlin 39 that someone had tried to convert to gate loading.  It had a rectangular hole milled into the side. He just planted to glue a medallion over the hole. 

Posted

Your correct RYE.

I should have clarified my usage of 'HENRY' was in reference to the Henry gun maker of our Henry rifles today.

 

..........Widder

Posted

I appreciate the newer Henry models that have both front and side loading.
Makes 'em easier to unload.

Posted
1 hour ago, Widder, SASS #59054 said:

Your correct RYE.

I should have clarified my usage of 'HENRY' was in reference to the Henry gun maker of our Henry rifles today.

 

..........Widder

No problem.

Posted
6 hours ago, Widder, SASS #59054 said:

IMHO:

"Simplicity of Design".    Much, much easier to tube feed.

 

Another question that might answer the original question:   'Why do you think HENRY originally made their centerfire pistol caliber

rifles with NO loading gate?

Answer: simplicity of design.     Everybody complained about the NO GATE function and Henry complied with a gate.

 

Why do you suppose MARLIN made their .32 H&R magnum 1894 model with NO GATE?

 

If I were to design a good, reliable lever rifle today, I would seriously consider the NO GATE design.

 

..........Widder

 

 

 

That would be my guess. Sticking .22 shells through a side feed sounds like a royal PITA,

JHC

Posted

It’s hard enough shoving them little .38s and .32s in through a loading gate that’s usually sprung pretty stiff, ‘specially with big ol’ arthritic fingers!!

 

Now you want ta’ have us old coots trying to fiddle with them tiny little .22LRs??

 

Yer a sick individual, you are!! 🙄🥴

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.