Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 3,461 Posted April 24 (edited) WE WIN!! (For now, anyway!) CRPA WINS PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CHALLENGING CALIFORNIA’S AMMUNITION RESTRICTIONS More Here: JUDGE TOSSES CALIFORNIA AMMUNITION PURCHASE LAW Quote U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez of San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales. Benitez called the ammunition background check law “onerous and convoluted” and “constitutionally defective.” “Criminals, tyrants, and terrorists don’t do background checks,” he wrote. “The background check experiment defies common sense while unduly and severely burdening the Second Amendment rights of every responsible, gun-owning citizen desiring to lawfully buy ammunition." Moreover, he ruled that the state's ban on importing ammunition from outside California violates federal interstate commerce laws. Edited April 24 by Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 11 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subdeacon Joe 17,644 Posted April 24 (edited) Well.... It is still up in the air. Wait until after the en banc hearing in the 9th gets through with it. Still, beats a poke in the eye with a cod. Edited April 24 by Subdeacon Joe 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 3,461 Posted April 24 Joe, go to your room. I suspect that if they overturned Benitez they're likely to get their hands judiciously slapped. Again. And remember... ten of the 29 judges on the Ninth are Trump appointees. Might be be colorful (expect absurd liberal rants), but the good guys should prevail. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hendo 405 Posted April 24 Thanks for posting that. I've been avoiding anything related to news to try and undamage my calm. So does this mean that at this very moment we can go and buy ammo without a background check? Sort of like "Freedom Week" on standard capacity magazines. Or are we still background checking until this ruling hits the 9th Circus? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subdeacon Joe 17,644 Posted April 24 18 minutes ago, Hendo said: Or are we still background checking until this ruling hits the 9th Circus? The judge has not stayed his order. Yet. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubious Don #56333 118 Posted April 24 Well. Will wonders ever cease? I shall be interested to see what the ninth does with this. They have had some um...personnel changes so we shall see. Ultimately, all of these laws may end up in front of the SC. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subdeacon Joe 17,644 Posted April 24 4 minutes ago, Dubious Don #56333 said: Well. Will wonders ever cease? I shall be interested to see what the ninth does with this. They have had some um...personnel changes so we shall see. Ultimately, all of these laws may end up in front of the SC. I gotta say that I'm dubious, Don. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubious Don #56333 118 Posted April 24 14 minutes ago, Subdeacon Joe said: I gotta say that I'm dubious, Don. Ah....the old Dubious Ploy.....I've heard of that LOL. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hendo 405 Posted April 24 Well, the downside at the moment is that the online ammo suppliers I used before the law hit the streets are out of what I usually buy. Prices seem to have increased, too. Stupid Covid. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pat Riot, SASS #13748 15,321 Posted April 24 (edited) 7 hours ago, Dubious Don #56333 said: Ultimately, all of these laws may end up in front of the SC. No, they don’t. The Supreme Court “chooses” what cases they will hear. Edit: Oops...you said “may”. Sorry... Edited April 24 by Pat Riot, SASS #13748 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pat Riot, SASS #13748 15,321 Posted April 24 Yep, yesterday I got an email from LAX Ammo telling me about this. They also announced a “sale” which included 9mm ammo that’s 8 cents per round higher than the average prices were in January... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pat Riot, SASS #13748 15,321 Posted April 24 Here is the ruling: 2020-04-23-Order-Granting-MPI.pdf Hope this works... 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perro Del Diablo 1,087 Posted April 24 Good news for our pards in in communfornia. I don't have confidence in ruling by 9th circus but I hope these victories continue. The totalitarian rulers will certainly try find another way if they don't get what they want. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ramblin Gambler 1,007 Posted April 24 17 hours ago, Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 said: Joe, go to your room. I suspect that if they overturned Benitez they're likely to get their hands judiciously slapped. Again. And remember... ten of the 29 judges on the Ninth are Trump appointees. Might be be colorful (expect absurd liberal rants), but the good guys should prevail. Was this judge a Trump appointee? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 3,461 Posted April 24 1 hour ago, Ramblin Gambler said: Was this judge a Trump appointee? Hon. Roger T. Benitez, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Nominated/Appointed by George W. Bush, 17 June, 2004. Assumed Senior Status, December 31, 2017. Born in Havana, Cuba.... 1 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
El Hombre Sin Nombre 1,810 Posted April 24 I reload all of my own ammo, but I feel like ordering something just to support the ruling and because I can haha 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clay Mosby 531 Posted April 25 (edited) Stay tuned, the sycophant to Gruesom mayor of LA got an emergency injunction or something to re-instate it. The battle ain't over. Edited April 25 by Clay Mosby Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bad Bascomb, SASS # 47,494 368 Posted April 25 Well, that didn't last long....... time for some 'Politician Removal'. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subdeacon Joe 17,644 Posted April 25 (edited) 8 hours ago, Clay Mosby said: Stay tuned, the sycophant to Gruesom mayor of LA got an emergency injunction or something to re-instate it. The battle ain't over. Do you have a link to that injunction? Does it only apply to Los Angeles or is it statewide? Found it over in TEAM SASS: https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5614/attachments/original/1587793502/2020-4-24-ca9-order-granting-stay.pdf?1587793502 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIM RHODE; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20-55437 D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00802-BEN-JLB Southern District of California, San Diego ORDER Before: MURGUIA and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. The court has received appellant’s emergency motion for a stay. The request for an immediate administrative stay is granted. The district court’s April 23, 2020 preliminary injunction order is temporarily stayed pending further court order. The court will address the emergency stay motion by separate order. Didn't take Newsom and his Sacramento Reichstag long. Edited April 25 by Subdeacon Joe 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967 3,461 Posted April 25 So how long is this expected to take to run it's course? Seems like we're still waiting for the magazine issue to be resolved. I'm hoping (aren't we all!) to see Messrs Becerra and Newsom get some comeuppance. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clay Mosby 531 Posted April 25 Here's what I saw this morning on FB..... oh never mind, I see you found it! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
