Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 gunfighter, stage is shoot five from revolver/s, shoot rifle, shoot 5 from pistol/s. Shooter fires BOTH revolvers for 5 shots and holsters, then shoots rifle,,, then draws again and shoots remaining 5 rounds.... what's the penalty... per written in the books?
Goody, SASS #26190 Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 Procedural, A Gunfighter may not holster revolvers with the intent to engage another revolver sequence. Once cocked, all rounds must be expended prior to holstering unless the revolvers were drawn at the wrong time or a revolver/ammunition malfunction has occurred. • Stage design may allow a competitor shooting Gunfighter Style to stage or restage revolvers between target sequences. If the stage scenario requires the use of another firearm between the revolver sequences or the shooter’s hands are otherwise constrained (e.g., rolling the dice between revolver sequences), the revolvers must be drawn and shot one at a time unless they can be safely staged rather than holstered. In this case, both revolvers may be employed at the same time for the first five rounds, safely restaged, and then employed at the same time again for the second five rounds.
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Author Posted February 23, 2015 why? (that's what I called on myself, but looking for it I can't find a penalty listing)..... it's sort of like the old gitting shells from the TO to complete the stage, it said you couldn't but didn't have a penalty listed for it.
Goody, SASS #26190 Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 Well, anything outlined as illegal I would assign a procedural if a more severe penalty was not codified in the handbooks.
Yusta B. Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 I'll take a stab at it RO I pg 24 Procedural enalties • Failure to adhere to the guidelines of the category in which you are competing. ?? RO I pg 15 (Gunfighters may choose to shoot five rounds, safely stage their loaded revolvers, hammerdown on a spent cartridge, shoot another firearm, retrieve the revolvers, and finish the“shooting string” before re-holstering.)
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Author Posted February 23, 2015 makes sense, Yusta!! guess I may have called it right....maybe,,,,, lately I've been wrong a few times,,,,, maybe
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Author Posted February 23, 2015 Well, anything outlined as illegal I would assign a procedural if a more severe penalty was not codified in the handbooks. but before getting shells from someone else was a no no, but without penalty.....
Jefro, SASS#69420 Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 I'll take a stab at it RO I pg 24 Procedural enalties • Failure to adhere to the guidelines of the category in which you are competing. ?? RO I pg 15 (Gunfighters may choose to shoot five rounds, safely stage their loaded revolvers, hammer down on a spent cartridge, shoot another firearm, retrieve the revolvers, and finish the “shooting string” before re-holstering.) Ta Daaa!! you beat me to it..........P • Failure to adhere to the guidelines of the category in which you are competing. Jefro Relax-Enjoy
Yusta B. Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 Ta Daaa!! you beat me to it..........P • Failure to adhere to the guidelines of the category in which you are competing. Jefro Relax-Enjoy And I missed another SHB pg 14 • Both revolvers may be cocked at the same time, but must be shot one at a time to facilitate scoring. A Gunfighter may not holster revolvers with the intent to engage another revolver sequence. And WOW - I think I got one right !
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Author Posted February 23, 2015 I had it right, but dint know why!!!!
Yusta B. Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 Only takes 3 paragraphs in two manuals to figure it out ! Hey - how 'bout when the manuals go in for a rewrite, they think about adding a "P", "SDQ" or "MDQ" every time they state a rule. Sure would save some time looking them up.
Most Wanted Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 CC , when I read your post I compared it to PWBs answer on a GF shooting both pistols simultaneously as a P for not following category guidelines. PS. Good for you on calling it on yourself. I've seen people do that and think it was legal.
PaleWolf Brunelle, #2495L Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 gunfighter, stage is shoot five from revolver/s, shoot rifle, shoot 5 from pistol/s. Shooter fires BOTH revolvers for 5 shots and holsters, then shoots rifle,,, then draws again and shoots remaining 5 rounds.... what's the penalty... per written in the books? Next time, contact your local RO INSTRUCTOR...s/he should know the answer to this one...or at least, know where to find the answer (HINT: Always start with the RO1 "Penalty Overview")
Cheyenne Culpepper 32827 Posted February 23, 2015 Author Posted February 23, 2015 brainfart!!!! but I calt et rite!!!!
Smokestack SASS#87384 Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 It is a progressive procedural. The next offense in the ame match is a SDQ and if it happens again a MDQ.
Ace_of_Hearts Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 It is a progressive procedural. The next offense in the ame match is a SDQ and if it happens again a MDQ. Don't make me come out there and spank you!
Blackey Cole Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Yusta great idea but it will never happen for that reason. Just like they will not create a sticky for wtcs
I. M. Crossdraw, SASS# 8321 Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 makes sense, Yusta!! guess I may have called it right....maybe,,,,, lately I've been wrong a few times,,,,, maybe Hey Shayene, U finely did sumtin rite. Nice Job Pard.
Rye Miles #13621 Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 It is a progressive procedural. The next offense in the ame match is a SDQ and if it happens again a MDQ. Is a "progressive" procedural 20 instead of 10??
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.