Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Question re the new schofields


Recommended Posts

I know they were originally lower power rounds ie the 45 schofield, 44 russian, etc.

The newer guns by Uberti,  can be had in 45Colt (notice I didn't say Long Colt, don't want this going off topic!)

To those who have them in 45 Colt how well do they hold up with lower power loads.

I know a ways back they dropped them for a while as they wouldn't stay timed.

Thanks for any input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some folks who have been shooting their 45 Colt Schofields for 20 years, so I think they are fine.  There was a single guy at Uberti who made the Schofields for a long time.  When he retired half a dozen years ago (?) the trainee started making them and it took some time for him to get up to speed.  But the design of the gun can handle the 45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got two of them in 45 Colt and shoot regular power loads in them, but so far have not broken over 1.000 rounds through either. Both are still tight as can be and run for a full match without fouling with smokeless powder. One is 5" and the other 7".

Running 8.0 grains Unique under a 250 grain RNFP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine were good for about 15,000 ends of 250 gen bullets at about 750 fps. Eventually had problems with both of them where the hand would not reliably rotate the cylinder. So I would say pretty durable.

 

Silver Rings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Uberti started chambering the Russian models in .45 Colt, they had to stretch the frame and cylinder slightly to accommodate it - that's directly from Giacomo Merlino. I don't know if something similar had to be done with the Schofields or not...? The more I think about it, probably not, as I think they were chambered in .44-40 right from the get go, which is slightly longer yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Three Foot Johnson said:

When Uberti started chambering the Russian models in .45 Colt, they had to stretch the frame and cylinder slightly to accommodate it - that's directly from Giacomo Merlino. I don't know if something similar had to be done with the Schofields or not...? The more I think about it, probably not, as I think they were chambered in .44-40 right from the get go, which is slightly longer yet.

Schofields only ever originally in .45 S&W.  They had to be enlarged for .45 Colt.  Only the New Model 3 was in .44-40.   I have one.  Sweet shooter

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 said:

Schofields only ever originally in .45 S&W.  They had to be enlarged for .45 Colt.  Only the New Model 3 was in .44-40.   I have one.  Sweet shooter

Referring to the Uberti repros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irish Ike nobody was talking unsafe. Asked how they held up re timing and such.

think some guns just aren't problematic from the get go. Colt D frames were notorious for going out of time!

They were only rated for std 38 ammo and any 38's on the hotter side they went out of time quickly.

Thanks for the responses much appreciated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.