Alpo Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 And this, boys and girls, is a prime example of why you are not supposed to use abbreviations cold. This is a movie of a gun. They're going to annihilate ballistics gel with that gun at 82,000 FPS. 82,000 ft per second??? Ain't no way in hell that gun, no matter how powerful it is, is shooting a bullet 82,000 ft per second. Oh, wait a minute. Camera. Ah. 82,000 frames per second. So if they'd said frames per second instead of FPS, there could be no confusion.
Yellowhouse Sam # 25171 Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 Kudos I think....but the 416 Remington is all I can stand and I can't stand much of it.
Dantankerous Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 Years ago I had a Remington and a Winchester both in 375 H&H mag. (I had read too much Capstick and couldn't help myself ). The Remington kicked like an angry mule while the Winchester was very manageable. Both bolt guns. The Winchester was quite a nice rifle. Both got sold eventually. I kinda miss the Winchester but there ain't no Cape Bufflers in the neighborhood that require an express gun.
Larsen E. Pettifogger, SASS #32933 Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 One nice thing about SASS. You do not need 82,000 FPS cameras. You can see the bullets going through the air and bouncing off the targets.
Alpo Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 2 hours ago, Dantankerous said: I kinda miss the Winchester but there ain't no Cape Bufflers in the neighborhood that require an express gun. I haven't needed it yet, but I feel that simply the fact that I have that 375 H&H is what keeps the rogue elephants out of my neighborhood.
Still hand Bill Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 A bit deceiving as they are shooting so close that unburned powder/gasses from the barrel are getting into the gel block causing the secondary flash and expansion. The actual bullet performance is not all that impressive.
One Gun Jimmy Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 37 minutes ago, Still hand Bill said: A bit deceiving as they are shooting so close that unburned powder/gasses from the barrel are getting into the gel block causing the secondary flash and expansion. The actual bullet performance is not all that impressive. The freeze frame at 12:10 I think, shows a temporary expansion of probably 18-30inches and then the permanent wound channel looks to be 4-5 inches in diameter. That would split a two legged preditor in half and take down any animal living and most extinct with decent shot placement. I don't know much about the round terminally but the initial power is quite impressive.
Alpo Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 Don't y'all remember those Arabs shooting at an indoor range? 577 tyrannosaur. Had four or five guys. They'd take one shot. Knocked the crap out of them. YouTube video 8 or 10 years back.
Subdeacon Joe Posted August 6, 2023 Author Posted August 6, 2023 7 hours ago, Alpo said: And this, boys and girls, is a prime example of why you are not supposed to use abbreviations cold. This is a movie of a gun. They're going to annihilate ballistics gel with that gun at 82,000 FPS. At about 6:20 he says 80,000 frames per second. Also, context. Since this is The Slow Mo Guys it's not a great leap to get that they're filming at that FPS, not that the muzzle velocity is that insane and unachievable speed. ADDED: I checked, 82000 feet per second = 55909.091 miles per hour Results in Speed of Sound: 55,909 mph = 72.86752 sound
G W Wade Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 Was thinking would be fun to them putting the butt of that rifle against the block of ballistic gel and see the disruption GW
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.