Lawdog Dago Dom Posted January 12 Posted January 12 HEAD FAKE: ‘National Reciprocity’ bill simply red meat for gun owners… it’s going nowhere in its current form – Guns Save Life 1 1 Quote
Blackwater 53393 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 In all honesty, it’s going to be difficult to get this passed, but keeping it in the public eye will help!! I wouldn’t trust Cornyn in an outhouse with a muzzle on him, but he COULD call in any favors owed him for selling us out on the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act with all the gun control crap in it!! Ain’t likely to happen, but we can hope!! 😡 5 Quote
Sedalia Dave Posted January 13 Posted January 13 With any luck Cornyn will be looking for a new job in 2027 2 1 Quote
Chickasaw Bill SASS #70001 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 IMO , this will not happen until the SC pulls the plug on the patchwork of laws To do that NFA'34 , FFA'38 , GCA'68 , along with the rest of the crap , will have to be declared Null & VOID along with charges , with teeth , brought and held against those that push ILLEGAL laws Chickasaw Bill 2 2 Quote
H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Perhaps this is wishful thinking but... Article IV Section 1 of the Constitution reads.... "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof." Seems to me that reciprocity already exists. Or at least it should. We need the Supreme Court to weigh in on this. The lack of reciprocity is unconstitutional. 2 Quote
John Kloehr Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Would prefer a Scotus ruling which states carry is a right, legislatures may impose penalties for violent acts. My concern with legislating reciprocity is the legislature is passing a law which allows a right... A later legislature could then rescind the law. The legislature has passed many laws restricting free speech. Threats. Incitement to riot, Truth in Advertising, etc. What if the legislature passed a law defining certain speech as explicitly legal? Perhaps criticizing the political party currently in power? Could a later legislature rescind that law therefore turning constitutionally protected speech into illegal speech? 1 1 Quote
H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 Posted January 14 Posted January 14 (edited) 19 hours ago, Rip Snorter said: John Roberts, manning up would be useful. I have long felt that the so called 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court is not. It's really a 5-3-1. Five Conservatives, three Liberals and one squishy Moderate that you have no idea where he's going to go. He's been leaning more right than left of late, but that's only since President Trump replaced the other Moderates with real Conservatives in his first term. I was "afraid" that if one of the Conservatives were to leave the court during the Biden years, we'd be at 4-4-1, and the squishy one would move back to the left again. There is a good chance that President Trump will get to make 1 or 2 more picks in his new term, but the odds are that it will be replacing leaving Conservatives with new ones, leading to no real change on the Supremes. The chances of one of the three Liberals leaving in the next four years are slim. Edited January 14 by H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.