Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Reciprocity: Fake News?


Recommended Posts

Posted

In all honesty, it’s going to be difficult to get this passed, but keeping it in the public eye will help!!

 

I wouldn’t trust Cornyn in an outhouse with a muzzle on him, but he COULD call in any favors owed him for selling us out on the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act with all the gun control crap in it!!

 

Ain’t likely to happen, but we can hope!!  😡

  • Like 5
Posted

IMO , this will not happen until the SC pulls the plug on the patchwork of laws 

 

 To do that NFA'34 , FFA'38 , GCA'68 , along with the rest of the crap , will have to be declared Null & VOID 

 

along with charges , with teeth , brought and held against those that push ILLEGAL laws 

 

  Chickasaw Bill 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Perhaps this is wishful thinking but...

Article IV Section 1 of the Constitution reads....

"Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof."

Seems to me that reciprocity already exists.  Or at least it should.   We need the Supreme Court to weigh in on this.   The lack of reciprocity is unconstitutional.

  • Like 2
Posted

Would prefer a Scotus ruling which states carry is a right, legislatures may impose penalties for violent acts.

 

My concern with legislating reciprocity is the legislature is passing a law which allows a right... A later legislature could then rescind the law.

 

The legislature has passed many laws restricting free speech. Threats. Incitement to riot, Truth in Advertising, etc. What if the legislature passed a law defining certain speech as explicitly legal? Perhaps criticizing the political party currently in power? Could a later legislature rescind that law therefore turning constitutionally protected speech into illegal speech?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Rip Snorter said:

John Roberts, manning up would be useful.

I have long felt that the so called 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court is not.  

It's really a 5-3-1.  Five Conservatives, three Liberals and one squishy Moderate that you have no idea where he's going to go.   He's been leaning more right than left of late, but that's only since President Trump replaced the other Moderates with real Conservatives in his first term.   I was "afraid" that if one of the Conservatives were to leave the court during the Biden years, we'd be at 4-4-1, and the squishy one would move back to the left again.

There is a good chance that President Trump will get to make 1 or 2 more picks in his new term, but the odds are that it will be replacing leaving Conservatives with new ones, leading to no real change on the Supremes.   The chances of one of the three Liberals leaving in the next four years are slim.

Edited by H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.