Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

I guess this is a procedural, according to the flow chart.


Three Foot Johnson

Recommended Posts

Shooting order was to double tap five targets outside, outside, inside, inside, middle -

 

1-1-5-5-2-2-4-4-3-3 or, since the order wasn't specified, 1-1-5-5-4-4-2-2-3-3, or start at the other end even, if you wanted, 5-5-1-1-4-4-2-2-3-3 or 5-5-1-1-2-2-4-4-3-3. It's not important which one we use, so I'll go with the 1st one -

 

Shooter apparently didn't see the first target when the buzzer went off and shot 2-2-5-5-3-3-4-4 and ran out of steel with two rounds left. He still didn't see the first target for some reason and double tapped #2 again: 2-2-5-5-3-3-4-4-2-2

 

According to the Miss Flow Chart, it appears this is a procedural only, even though target #1 was never engaged at all.

 

Did the shooter hit all the correct type of targets with legally acquired ammo?

 

YES

 

Assess no misses.

 

Did the shooter engage the targets in the correct order?

 

NO

 

Assess procedural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hit (shot at and hit) the appropriate targets with the appropriate gun. No misses. Only a "P".

 

If he had shot say the rifle targets with the pistol, or the other way around, then there would be misses involved.

 

Ahh, the flowchart. Sometimes good, sometimes not, but it is what it is.

 

Dang It

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recalibrate your internal definition of a miss. It's wrong.

 

A "SASS miss" is failing to hit the correct TYPE of target for the gun being used (or not enough shots fired as specified by the stage instructions). Shooting the targets out of order is only a procedural penalty.

 

Good luck, GJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Did the shooter hit all the correct type of targets with legally acquired ammo?

 

YES

 

Assess no misses.

 

 

So, it seems the answer to would be NO. shooter didn't hit ALL the correct targets with legally acquired ammo. Just something to think about maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, interpretation...

 

Did he hit all the correct type of targets?

 

NO, HE ONLY HIT 4 OUT OF 5.

 

Perhaps it should say, "Did all bullets hit the correct type of targets?"

 

Either way, procedural or two misses, it would be the same 10 second penalty in this case. We assessed it as a procedural only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, it seems the answer to would be NO. shooter didn't hit ALL the correct targets with legally acquired ammo. Just something to think about maybe.

 

Yes he did, key word being TYPE just wrong order.

 

KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, it seems the answer to would be NO. shooter didn't hit ALL the correct targets with legally acquired ammo. Just something to think about maybe.

 

 

Awkwardly worded sentence in the flow chart.

 

Can be made more clear if reworded to have the intent that the rules committee seems to have wanted:

 

"Did the shooter, with each shot fired, hit the correct type of targets with legally acquired ammo?"

 

Good luck, GJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Ed McMahon often said to Johnny Carson and Phil Hartman, while mimicking Ed, often said to Dana Carvey, who often mimicked Johnny, "You are correct, Sir!" It's only a P. :D

 

 

Basically, you're not double penalizing a shooter for having a brain fade. Even if the shooter had completely misunderstood the instructions and instead shot the targets inside to outside, he would have hit all the correct "type" of targets, but in the wrong order. Shooting the targets in the wrong order is what brought about the P.

 

On one occasion I was nearby when a shooter got mixed up and shot the rifle targets with his pistols. Not only did it slow him down tremendously, after hitting all the rifle targets, he received 10 misses...but no P. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was there 10 dings?

 

If so no misses. He hit pistol targets 10 times but out of order. No misses and a P.

 

Painted Filly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.