Five Things ‘2nd Amendment People’ Could Do to Stop Gun-Grabbing Hillary

[Colonel Dan, SASS #24025]

I urge all Second Amendment supporters to seriously think about it. This election will be more deterministic than many want to believe.

CD

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/09/five-things-2nd-amendment-people-could-do-to-stop-gun-grabbing-hillary/

The idea that Trump’s comments should be interpreted as a threat highlight the ignorance that leads these same gun-grabbers to assume gun owners own guns because they are violent. The truth is that gun owners are overwhelmingly peaceful, responsible, and organized and that Donald Trump’s comment is correct, there are many things gun owners can do to stop gun-grabbing Hillary. Here is what Donald Trump said, “If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is. I don’t know. ”

Donald Trump is right, there are things that “2nd Amendment people” can do to stop gun-grabbing Hillary and none of them include violence.

1: Unite to defeat gun-grabbing Hillary in November’s election

Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller issued a statement to the media pointing out that “2nd Amendment people” could stop Hillary Clinton by uniting to defeat Hillary Clinton at the ballot box.

It’s called the power of unification – 2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power. And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it won’t be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump.

Well organized gun organizations like Gun Owners of America and the NRA will credibly argue that any gun owner who votes for anybody but Donald Trump in November is casting a vote against their interests as a gun owner.

2: Block gun-grabbing Hillary in the Congress

The Obama administration has said that they are “profoundly frustrated,” that their gun-grabbing agenda has been blocked by Congress. Obama himself has said, “The one area that I feel I’ve been the most frustrated and the most stymied, it is the fact that the United States of America is the one advanced nation on earth in which we do not have sufficient common-sense gun safety laws.”

Even if Hillary Clinton is elected she might find it difficult to pass her gun-grabbing agenda through Congress.

3: Block gun-grabbing Hillary in the courts

“2nd Amendment people” have had significant success reversing gun-grabbing laws in the courts during the last decade. The largest being Heller -v- District of Columbia which ruled Washington DC’s draconian gun ban unconstitutional. While Hillary will certainly try to appoint judges who are open to the reinterpretation of the 2nd Amendment, she has stated that she would use opposition to the Supreme Court ruling on campaign finance laws known simply as “Citizens United” as a litmus test. Which litmus tests will she prioritize? The Senate must also approve Supreme Court nominees and could block gun-grabbing nominees.

4: Peacefully disobey gun-grabbing Hillary

On 2/23/2013 more than a hundred thousand “2nd Amendment people” rallied in more than 100 locations across the country as part of the “Day of Resistance.” The message to the political and media elite was that peaceful gun owners would use every peaceful means necessary to resist laws and “interpretations” that infringe on constitutional rights. Just because Hillary Clinton decrees a limit on magazine capacity or which “scary looking guns” are banned doesn’t mean that otherwise law-abiding gun owners will comply.

 

5: Nullify gun-grabbing Hillary in the states

As a last resort, “2nd Amendment people” can pass laws at the state level nullifying federal laws that infringe on constitutional rights including the 2nd Amendment. At a minimum, this would legally tie the issue up for years giving “2nd Amendment people” more opportunities to block the gun-grabbers at the ballot box.

Gun owners are determined to preserve the 2nd Amendment for future generations because they understand that it is the last defense against government tyranny. Donald Trump understands their determination and knows that they are prepared to peacefully fight gun-grabbing globalists like Hillary Clinton even if she wins the election in November.

Dustin Stockton is a political reporter for Breitbart News, a community liaison for Gun Owners of America, and a political strategist. Follow him on Twitter @DustinStockton or Facebook.

[Rooster Ron Wayne]

If every NRA member or Even better Every gun owner ,

Get out and VOTES for TRUMP !

It would be a land slide for Trump to take the office as Presented of this

Great United States .

:-)

So I challeng all gun owners,

To stand and fight for the SECOND AMENDMENT at the Voting polls this November !

[Mad Dane, SASS#5536]

I am with y'all 100%-and so is most of Alabama.

Let us all hope and pray it will stop at peaceful civil disobedience.

[Tascosa, SASS# 24838]

Mudd Rooster is right. If EVERY gun owner and NRA member votes for Trump he will win regardless how the DNC trys to fix the election./

VOTE!!~

[Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L]

If every NRA member or Even better Every gun owner ,

Get out and VOTES for TRUMP !

It would be a land slide for Trump to take the office as Presented of this

Great United States .

:-)

So I challeng all gun owners,

To stand and fight for the SECOND AMENDMENT at the Voting polls this November !

 

Yup! Let's defeat Headache Hillary!

 

GG ~

[The Original Lumpy Gritz]

What we need to do is to make sure the Electoral College votes the way we tell'em. They have not always done so.

CA. has the largest number of electoral votes in the nation. When was the last time CA. voted for a Republican POTUS candidate?

 

 

OLG

[Yul Lose]

What we need to do is to make sure the Electoral College votes the way we tell'em. They have not always done so.

CA. has the largest number of electoral votes in the nation. When was the last time CA. voted for a Republican POTUS candidate?

 

 

OLG

I'm guessing Reagan maybe.

[The Original Lumpy Gritz]

Correct-From 1968-1988 Ca. EC voted "R".

OLG

[Yul Lose]

Man, couldn't we use Reagan now?

[Blackwater 53393]

Correct-From 1968-1988 Ca. EC voted "R".

OLG

In those years, the Republican candidate won the majority of votes in California. After that, Dems carried the day in the Golden State. Whichever candidate gets the most of the popular vote in a state gets that state's electoral votes on the first ballot of the Electoral Colledge.

[The Original Lumpy Gritz]

There has been four times in our history, that the EC did NOT follow the popular vote. The last time was in 2000.

If folks think it can't happen again, they're fools..........This election is 'ripe' with that possibility.

OLG