Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

California ammo buyers…

JD Lud

Recommended Posts

Happy Day~!!  



Judge Benitez wrote that such laws “constitute a long, embarrassing, disgusting, insidious, reprehensible list of examples of government tyranny towards our own people.”



  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prop 63 should have never happened. Ironic that just before the proposition was to be voted on some whack job killed a bunch of people in San Bernardino. 

Here’s what CRPA, California Rifle and Pistol Association has to say about this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is even harder now than a few weeks ago to find the actual text of a ruling, but here it is:




On edit: It will of course be appealed. The previous ruling was appealed, Bruen resulted in it going back to Benitez.


This started back in 2016 when a ballot measure (Prop 63) proposed a background check for ammo. $50 for a card good for 4 years.


The state legislature then passed a law changing it before it went into effect so what the people voted on was not the law which would go into affect. Background check on every ammunition purchase became the law, and no 4-year card for $50.


While Benitez does not say the original ballot measure would be constitutional, he does note the bar would be much lower for what the citizens did actually vote for.

Edited by John Kloehr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.