CA Assembly Committee Passes 4 of 5 Anti-Civil Rights Bills

[Subdeacon Joe]

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/uncategorized/breaking-assembly-committee-passes-4-of-5-anti-gun-bills/

 

The bills that passed were:

AB 1664, which will BAN all firearms with a bullet button;

AB 1673, which will CRIMINALIZE the possession of unserialized firearms parts;

AB 1674, which will BAN buying more than one firearm within a 30 day period;

and AB 1695, which will send gun owners HARASSING mailers regarding the myriad of laws they have already complied with.

They are now heading to the Floor and we need you to take action NOW!

They have to be voted on by NEXT FRIDAY to meet the upcoming deadline.

There was a silver lining to the Committee ramming these 4 bills through the process.

AB 1663, the bill that would have BANNED the M1 Carbine and many older rifles ranging from World War II onward, was killed in the same Committee.

Luckily your grandpa’s rifles will be safe for another year from the gun grabbers.

But with the rest of the garbage that was passed, we CANNOT let up.

Commentary: http://www.dailynews.com/opinion/20160526/new-gun-laws-in-california-would-be-in-supreme-courts-crosshairs-susan-shelley

 

 

 

Gun owners in California recently woke up to the news that the California Senate had passed a stack of bills putting new restrictions on the use of guns.

If they all become law, you’ll need a license to sell ammunition and a background check to buy it, magazines that hold more than 10 rounds will be illegal, more guns will be classified as “assault weapons,” homemade guns will need state serial numbers, and it will be a crime to loan a gun to anyone who isn’t a family member or a licensed hunter.

Are those proposed laws constitutional?

The Supreme Court said in 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, that Americans have the right as individuals to keep and bear arms. The court struck down Washington, D.C.’s, “absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home.”

But the Heller decision left many questions unanswered, starting with whether the Second Amendment was binding on the 50 states as well as on the District of Columbia.

When the first 10 amendments to the Constitution were ratified in 1791, nobody thought they applied to the states. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in 1833 that if Congress had intended the Bill of Rights to bind the states, “they would have declared this purpose in plain and intelligible language.”

 

[Subdeacon Joe]

[Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967]

Pretty sobering video, SD....

[Yul Lose]

Hard to believe the guy that sponsored this bill thinks that removing the bullet button makes a firearm fully automatic and was a police officer at one time.

[Blackwater 53393]

Probably another KNOW IT ALL desk jockey who never took a qualifying shot!!

 

Bet the rank and file officers wherever he was employed woulda' fragged him given the chance!!

[Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L]

Hard to believe the guy that sponsored this bill thinks that removing the bullet button makes a firearm fully automatic and was a police officer at one time.

 

Agendas override facts in this case....liberals function that way.

 

GG ~