Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Charlie T Waite

Eric Swalwell on assault weapons

Recommended Posts

I'd venture a guess that there are way more that 15,000,000 semi-automatic rifles out there that fit his "definition" of assault  unacceptable weapons!!  If this ever came to pass, the very next instant would bring an attack on single action and single shot rifles and shotguns!!  They wouldn't stop until all we had was spoons, sticks, and rocks to protect ourselves with.

 

My immediate pressing question is, "What's lower on the intelligence scale than IDIOT??  This guy may be the poster child for that level!!

Share this post


Link to post

If I even had such a thing as what the buyback is proposed to do, and I don't know anyone who owns such a thing either, I'm sure they would be happy to sell back an $800 item for $10,000 but probably not much less than that...

 

:o

Share this post


Link to post

How does someone buy back something that they didn't sell?

Share this post


Link to post
17 hours ago, Tyrel Cody said:

How does someone buy back something that they didn't sell?

 

 The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. :huh:

 

 I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Dantankerous said:

 

 The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. :huh:

 

 I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. 

 

AMEN

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, Dantankerous said:

 

 The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. :huh:

 

 I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. 

 

This last would certainly be best for our nation, but these malefactors would not be in power in another more suitable nation.  Their goal is to disarm and subjugate US, leaving themselves in the position of power.  In a country already disarmed, they would have to disarm themselves upon arrival, becoming subjects in doing so.

Share this post


Link to post

After you click on article, within it there is a link to the Esquire magazine interview that the article cites.

 

I urge you to read the interview.

Share this post


Link to post

 

Quote

My immediate pressing question is, "What's lower on the intelligence scale than IDIOT??  This guy may be the poster child for that level!!

 

Remember what Mark Twain said:  "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." 

Share this post


Link to post

This is the guy who said the US Gov't would just nuke gun owners who did not turn in their AR's.

 

WHAAAAAAAAAAT?

 

If he is willing to use the government to mass murder the country's citizens this makes him a mirror image of Hitler, does it not?

Share this post


Link to post
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.