Lawdog Dago Dom Posted November 11, 2023 Share Posted November 11, 2023 Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Enforcement of Pistol-Brace Ban | The Reload Link to comment
Blackwater 53393 Posted November 11, 2023 Share Posted November 11, 2023 It would be better if the court permanently enjoined the ATF and other bureaucracies from EVER writing laws!! Link to comment
Chickasaw Bill SASS #70001 Posted November 11, 2023 Share Posted November 11, 2023 It would be lots better if all the gun laws , NFA34 , FFA38 , GCA68 , and all the rest were thrown out AND if there were 1 prosecutor with enough moxie to charge the fools with civil right infringement charges Chickasaw Bill Link to comment
John Kloehr Posted November 11, 2023 Share Posted November 11, 2023 20 hours ago, Blackwater 53393 said: It would be better if the court permanently enjoined the ATF and other bureaucracies from EVER writing laws!! The executive branch has no authority to write law. That is what this preliminary injunction explained. By making possession of arms which were legal into possession of illegal arms, the rule is legislative, not interpretive. The executive can only interpret. So this judge ruling on an appeal for a preliminary injunction found the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in a trial on the merits; trial on the merits has not yet happened. Finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits is just the first of several tests to issue a preliminary injunction; this ruling only addressed the first test, finding the lower court erred on this step. So now there is a preliminary injunctions, but it is not the injunction the plaintiffs sought from the lower court. The ruling remands the question back to the previous court to begin with the first step found in the affirmative, and to evaluate the remaining questions for a preliminary injunction. The preliminary injunction in the above ruling is for 60 days, or until the lower court issues a ruling based on the remaining question, The lower court is also instructed to rule in the next 60 days. And all of this is just for a preliminary injunction, it is not a trial on the merits. For up to 60 days, the injunction is in place until the lower court rules again on a preliminary injunction for the purpose of a trial on the merits. The current injunction is only lasts until the lower court rules again. And the trial is still in the future, then an appeal is likely no matter the outcome. Link to comment
Blackwater 53393 Posted November 12, 2023 Share Posted November 12, 2023 A permanent injunction, prohibiting the executive branch and its massive bureaucracy from putting “pen to paper” in any way that regulates the constitutionally protected rights of citizens, would put an end to the defacto creation of “laws” that lack the authority of an elected representative legislature!! Link to comment
Mossy Horn Gent Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 The ban is not lifted. Per the preliminary injunction, the ATF is not allowed to enforce the ban for now. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.