Badger Mountain Charlie SASS #43172 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Not wanting to hijack the Buck Rogers thread, I got to thunking again. I know, not a good sign. I am wondering why the military did not choose the .22-250 round over the .223? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Pain Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Badger, As a retired U.S. Army officer with some experience, the answer, unfortunately, usually boils down to lobbying and politics! Major Payne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyrus Cassidy #45437 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Badger, As a retired U.S. Army officer with some experience, the answer, unfortunately, usually boils down to lobbying and politics! Major Payne As a former US Army officer and current US Army Reserve officer, I agree +10000000000000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Mountain Charlie SASS #43172 Posted March 3, 2011 Author Share Posted March 3, 2011 Well, sirs, I thank you both for you insight and I thank you for your service to our country. Sadly, I feel that you are correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.