Blackwater 53393 Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Typical judicial "legislation"!! A total overreach by an obviously liberal "activist" judge!! Link to comment
Charlie T Waite Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 2 hours ago, Blackwater 53393 said: Typical judicial "legislation"!! A total overreach by an obviously liberal "activist" judge!! Per Christopher Scalia, son of late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, “If federal judges returned to the more modest approach our Founding Fathers envisioned for them, they would be less likely to rule according to their preferred policy preferences and more likely to leave political decisions to our elected representatives.” Justice Antonin Scalia himself, long ago warned Americans about the excessive intrusion of politics into the judicial appointment process. “He knew that persuading people to this way of thinking would help return the judicial branch to its proper status as what Hamilton famously called ‘the least dangerous branch.” Judges need to return to the more limited role they had held for most of our nation’s history: applying laws and statutes according to their text and interpreting the Constitution according to its original public meaning, using history, tradition and precedent as guides. I take this to heart before each court session. Link to comment
Sedalia Dave Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Wonder how on earth they expect to enforce that totally useless do nothing law? Link to comment
Sedalia Dave Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 I also wonder why no one challenges these laws because all the additional fees for background checks, training classes and permits effectively deny poor people the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. In some states the fees likely add up to more than the cost of the firearm. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.