Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Cities Banning Ownership of Semi-Auto Rifles and Handguns


Sedalia Dave

Recommended Posts

Boulder Colorado has joined Deerfield Illinois in passing city ordnances against residents owning semi-automatic firearms. :(:angry:

 

Boulder Just Banned Ownership of AR-15 Rifles

 

Quote

Well, this is no shocker. Bolstered by the Supreme Court’s inaction on answering the question concerning the constitutionality of assault weapons bans, slices of Blue America have taken it to its limits—and by limits I mean passing ordinances that are totally unconstitutional. In Deerfield, Illinois, the village has banned the ownership of AR-15 rifles and other firearms liberals find scary. Yet, it goes beyond that, because the definition of an assault weapon (yes, I know not a real term) is so broad. Essentially any firearm that uses a detachable magazine that holds more than ten rounds is a so-called assault weapon in this Chicago suburb. So, we’re not just talking about rifles, handguns are included as well—and this is a gun ban law. These weapons must be transferred out of the village, destroyed, or turned over to the police. Non-compliance is a $250-$1,000/day fine. It’s unlawful to be a gun owner in Deerfield. Yes, that’s unconstitutional, but they’re not alone. Boulder passed a similar law last month


 

Quote

 

…the city of Boulder, Colorado, is following suit. On Tuesday [May 15], Boulder's City Council unanimously passed a ban on the sale and possession of assault weapons, high-capacity magazines and bump-stock devices -- even while attorneys from a pro-gun rights group threatened legal action.

In accordance with the new ordinance, owners of high-capacity magazines and bump stocks will have until July 15 to dispose of the firearm accessories or sell them. After that point, they will not be permitted in the city of Boulder.

 

 

Come on SCOTUS but an end to this BS once and for all.

Link to comment

AFAIK Miller already decided that-- the essence of the decision in Miller was that any firearm similar to firearms in common use in the Army was OK: protected under 2A

 

that won't slow down the communist attack though.   Their strategy is to break the opposition using legal costs.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.