Litl Red Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/12/convicted-oregon-pimp-sues-nike-over-lack-shoe-warning-label/ So the story is about a pimp that kills a John by stomping him to death with Nike shoes, and BLAMES THE SHOES. The pimp was found guilty of murder (murder by shoe?) so he is suing Nike for making a shoe that can be used to stomp people to death for not paying their debts. Think the pimp will win? Think the courts will blame the shoes? Don't think they'll fall for such a stretch? OK, it's Oregon, so they might but IF THEY DON'T............... They would set a precedent that it's not the shoe, it's the wearer. hhhmmmmmmmmm Link to comment
The Shoer 27979 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/12/convicted-oregon-pimp-sues-nike-over-lack-shoe-warning-label/ So the story is about a pimp that kills a John by stomping him to death with Nike shoes, and BLAMES THE SHOES. The pimp was found guilty of murder (murder by shoe?) so he is suing Nike for making a shoe that can be used to stomp people to death for not paying their debts. Think the pimp will win? Think the courts will blame the shoes? Don't think they'll fall for such a stretch? OK, it's Oregon, so they might but IF THEY DON'T............... They would set a precedent that it's not the shoe, it's the wearer. hhhmmmmmmmmm No, if it was California I think he would stand a chance of winning Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.