Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

John Kloehr

Members
  • Posts

    3,577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Kloehr

  1. I don't know enough about the nuance of legal process, but do see ruling the case is not "submitted" does seem strange. I my just be ignorant of details such as legal arguments all submitted and oral arguments have been held.

     

    Otherwise it is about the same as staying proceedings pending another decision.

     

    I am missing a piece of legal glue to rule "not submitted" versus "stayed pending"...

  2. 33 minutes ago, Elkhorn Ernie said:

    ... The only down fall on then is the lack of after market parts for then. 

    But do these really need aftermarket parts?

     

    Also, the woodwork finish is oil so more oil fixes minor dings, no sanding and recoating.

     

    I have a Miroku and an Uberti.

  3. 1 hour ago, WOODFOX , sass#34179 said:

    I tried to remove mine from my profile and it's still there what am I missing?

    Woodfox

    I see you have your email address in the "AIM" field. You also have your birthdate filled out. Find the edit button for your profile and make sure all of the following are blank, and save the edit:

     

    ScreenShot2024-03-22at10_28_26AM.thumb.png.50617ac3329fadbec3e5f8670f4c22a1.png

    • Like 1
  4. 22 minutes ago, Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984 said:

    20 imperial fluid ounces?  Or us fluid ounces?  It’s better not to fuss the details, spaghetti sauce is spaghetti sauce.

     

    8FE01F6C-F95E-4807-A582-0690D6D7C75E.jpeg

    Now you went and changed units from pints to ounces. This changes things about 20%, though probably fine for spaghetti sauce.

     

    The British Imperial pint is 568.261 ml (20 fluid ounces), while the US Customary pint is 473.176 ml (16 fl oz). 

  5. 24 minutes ago, DocWard said:

    I cannot post it here or I have a feeling the ban sledgehammer would come out, but if you are not easily offended, have a warped, even dark, sense of humor, and have been in the military (particularly the Army) google "213 Things Skippy is No Longer Allowed to do in the U.S. Army."

    If you are easily offended, do not have a warped, dark sense of humor, DON'T! But it does beg the question, why are you on this thread to begin with?

     

    You've been warned.

    Just edit your post to include an NSFW tag before the google instructions, you should be fine. I only got to #75 or so, but get the idea. And while I did not serve, I did the search.

    • Thanks 1
  6. On 3/19/2024 at 3:58 PM, Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 said:

    RIGHT. And even after writing a book, I've STILL never needed to diagram a sentence.

    Having myself just put significant effort into putting this sentence together, I have no desire to take it apart.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  7. 3 hours ago, Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984 said:

    There is always “ a pint a pound the world around” as a guideline.

    Yes, depending on what the meaning of "pint" is.

     

    From:

     

    https://www.splashlearn.com/math-vocabulary/measurements/pint#:~:text=As per the U.S. measurement,(i.e.%2C 20.0448 ounces).

     

    1.04318 pounds
     
    As per the U.S. measurement system, 1 liquid pint of water equals about a pound (16 ounces) in weight. The actual measure of a U.S. pint of water isn't exactly 1 pound. It is about 1.04318 pounds. On the other hand, the British imperial pint weighs 1.2528 pounds (i.e., 20.0448 ounces).
  8. I have bought on GB, but mostly use it as an easy reference to see if the asking price for something I am interested in is a good value (answering the question "can I buy it cheaper on GB?).

     

    Having never sold a gun, I can not comment on that side of using GB.

    • Like 1
  9. 17 minutes ago, Abilene Slim SASS 81783 said:

    That headache I got somewhere around 1965-1966 is coming back…

    Then stop reading this post right now.

     

    For square root of a number, take the log of the number, divide the log by 2, and take the antilog of the result.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
  10. 4 hours ago, bgavin said:

    Well, thanks for the update.
    As usual, when the Quote Police show up, the message of the post is long lost to the quibbling over the fine points of authenticity.

     

    I have added your certification to my quote file.

    If all one is interested in is emotional agreement with those who agree, then fake quotes serve this purpose.

     

    If one wants to create dialog which brings others to the same viewpoint, fake quotes terminate such dialog.

     

    In this case, there is a legitimate quote which supports the dialog.

     

    A13usaonutL._CLa%7C2140,2000%7C61Q5UtOFP

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
  11. 3 minutes ago, bgavin said:

    "It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."
    --Joe Stalin

    Fake quote, but at least manufactured from a real quote:

     

    Mark Kramer, director of the Cold War studies program at Harvard University, pointed us to something close. In memoirs written after his retirement, Boris Bazhanov, Stalin’s former personal secretary, claimed that Stalin said: "Я считаю, что совершенно неважно, кто и как будет в партии голосовать; но вот что чрезвычайно важно, это кто и как будет считать голоса." It translates to: "I regard it as completely unimportant who in the party will vote and how, but it is extremely important who will count the votes and how."

    • Thanks 1
  12. I've seen this discussed in other places and there seems to be some consensus for this.

     

    North Carolina may be both the next and last state to institute permitless carry. This will bring the total to (I recall) 40, and the last 10 states will simply not do so absent a cultural shift or Supreme Court ruling invalidating permit requirements.

     

    Since Bruen did not cast doubt on "longstanding" permit requirements, I suspect the Supreme Court would support them under the "more nuanced" analysis rather than invalidate such requirements completely. At the same time, the court indicated "abusive" permit requirements would not be constitutional.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.