Tall John Posted September 19 Posted September 19 (edited) I inherited a very old can of Hodgdon H110 that is sealed and appears in very new condition. Previous owner said it had been stored in climate control home. Assuming that it isn’t red or abnormally aromatic when I open the can and burns vigorously when ignited with a match, I’m thinking about loading up some 240 grain Nosler JHPs in brand new Starline brass. The published min/max published load data only has a 1 grain spread between the min/max loads (corrected 23-24 grains) Primer recommendation is Rem 2 1/2 (LPP’s). I have CCI’s, WRE’s and FED LPP’s. 1. Would you try loading with this old powder? 2. if yes, which primer Brand would you choose? 3. Assuming I start with the min load, Would you test fire through a Marlin 1894 rifle or a S&W 6” 629? (Load data is the same for handgun or rifle.) any other thoughts? (obviously these would not be for SASS) Edited September 19 by Tall John Corrected load range to 23-24 grains Quote
Cholla Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Signs of bad powder: An overwhelmingly sharp, acidic, or pungent chemical odor instead of a mild solvent smell. Visual Changes: A fine red, rust-colored, or amber dust coating the kernels or inside the container, or kernels turning completely yellow, green, or snow-white. Fumes: Visible rust-colored or brownish fumes escaping when you first open the container. Corrosion: Rusted container caps from the inside out, or bleached plastic lids. I have only seen one can of powder that was rusty, and it went on the yard. Barring these signs, I would use it. 3 Quote
Cholla Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Hornady has a minimum of 20.7 and a maximum of 24.8 grains of H110 behind a 240-grain JHP. I recommend getting a couple of printed reloading manuals, taking a sample from each, and then deciding. I have a library of 32 reloading manuals going back to the 1940s that I reference. 4 1 Quote
Rattlesnake Slim Posted September 19 Posted September 19 I shot a ton of .44 magnum back in my long range handgun silhouette days in Ruger Super Blackhawks Redhawk, and Dan Wesson revolvers. H110 was one of my favorite, most accurate powders. I always seemed to have the best accuracy at about 90% of maximum. I would start well below that, and just work up until you reach your best groups and call it good. Nothing to be gained beyond that. Get ready for a sore shoulder, I always thought it was easier on me to shoot those loads out of a handgun than a rifle. 3 Quote
Edward R S Canby, SASS#59971 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 This powder (and its twin W296) prefer magnum pistol primers. Read the manufacturers notes before reducing loads below the published minimum. 5 1 Quote
H. K. Uriah, SASS #74619 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Always start with a minimum load. Fire it first in your rifle. If it seems similar to your other loads in the caliber, try the revolver. For .44 Magnum, I use Winchester Large Pistol primers "For Standard or Magnum Loads." If fact, that's what I use for everything, larger or small, rifle or pistol primers. Never failed me. Of course, in this caliber, I load a 200 grain bullet in front of a charge of Trailboss. Very different performance from what you'll get with the 110. (I think.) Good luck. 2 Quote
High Spade Mikey Wilson Posted September 19 Posted September 19 You'll know pretty quick when you open the can and smell and look at it if it went bad or not. If it's good, which I'm betting it will be, shoot it. 2 Quote
Sedalia Dave Posted September 19 Posted September 19 9 hours ago, Edward R S Canby, SASS#59971 said: This powder (and its twin W296) prefer magnum pistol primers. Read the manufacturers notes before reducing loads below the published minimum. THIS ^^^^ Going below published minimum of H110 is not considered wise. Be sure your rounds are firmly crimped at the correct OAL for that specific bullet profile. 3 Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 H-110/WW-296 works best at the top end of load data with magnum primers and firm roll-crimp! 4 Quote
Widder, SASS #59054 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 11 hours ago, Tall John said: The published min/max published load data only has a 1 grain spread between the min/max loads (26-27 grains) Primer recommendation is Rem 2 1/2 (LPP’s). I have CCI’s, WRE’s and FED LPP’s. TALL JOHN, You stated the load data allows 26-27 grains for your bullet weight. Double/triple check your data again. MAX load is 24 grains......and your starting load should be 23 grains. you will be happy with 23.0 grains using H110 with the 240 bullet. My loads are 23.3 /23.4 grains in my S&W 629, Colt Kodiak and at one time, my Marlin 1894 (when I had one in .44 mag). As for using 'old' H110 powder.......unless any of the tale-tale signs listed above are apparent, you will be fine using it as a top performer in .44 mag. A few years back, I had some 20+ year old H110 that had been stored in a cool, dry closet. I also had some 20+ year old loaded ammo and some new loaded .44 mag using new H110 powder. THEN, I loaded up some new .44 mag ammo USING THE 20+ year old H110. I took all those various pieces of ammo and chonographed them to compare performance variations. There was no variations in velocities from one batch to the other. Incredible performance. PRIMER: I prefer CCI LP mag primer or Winchester Large Pistol. A good crimp is a must to ensure your bullets stay secure under recoil. Measure a particular bullet and don't fire it. Stick it in the cylinder, shoot the other 5 rounds and pull out the previously measured round and recheck its OAL. Try to set your crimp to where bullet OAL doesn't change more than .006 - .008 in OAL. This variation should keep your crimp in the cannelure and also help give consistent performance in each shot. Good luck and happy shooting. ..........Widder ALSO........case OAL should stay around 1.280 ..........Widder 2 2 Quote
Ya Big Tree Posted September 19 Posted September 19 From the Hornady Handbook Fourth Edition. Copy Write 1991. Magnum Primers. I use CCI magnum primers 1 1 Quote
Tall John Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 2 hours ago, Widder, SASS #59054 said: TALL JOHN, You stated the load data allows 26-27 grains for your bullet weight. Double/triple check your data again. MAX load is 24 grains......and your starting load should be 23 grains. you will be happy with 23.0 grains using H110 with the 240 bullet. My loads are 23.3 /23.4 grains in my S&W 629, Colt Kodiak and at one time, my Marlin 1894 (when I had one in .44 mag). As for using 'old' H110 powder.......unless any of the tale-tale signs listed above are apparent, you will be fine using it as a top performer in .44 mag. A few years back, I had some 20+ year old H110 that had been stored in a cool, dry closet. I also had some 20+ year old loaded ammo and some new loaded .44 mag using new H110 powder. THEN, I loaded up some new .44 mag ammo USING THE 20+ year old H110. I took all those various pieces of ammo and chonographed them to compare performance variations. There was no variations in velocities from one batch to the other. Incredible performance. PRIMER: I prefer CCI LP mag primer or Winchester Large Pistol. A good crimp is a must to ensure your bullets stay secure under recoil. Measure a particular bullet and don't fire it. Stick it in the cylinder, shoot the other 5 rounds and pull out the previously measured round and recheck its OAL. Try to set your crimp to where bullet OAL doesn't change more than .006 - .008 in OAL. This variation should keep your crimp in the cannelure and also help give consistent performance in each shot. Good luck and happy shooting. ..........Widder ALSO........case OAL should stay around 1.280 ..........Widder thanks Widder et al! Yes I mis quoted the range. Good advise on checking crimp between shots! Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 H-110/WW231 meters great through my Dillion PM. FWIW, I load 24.0gn of 110 in my .44mag/240gn loads. Fire them through my S&W 629-5 Mountain Gun. 2 Quote
Griff Posted September 19 Posted September 19 For firearms chambered in 44 Magnum level that have also been chambered in 45 Colt, (Ruger BlackHawk, Super BH, Redhawk, & rifles such as the Rossi 92, Marlin 1894, Winchester 94), it can provide a level of performance that rivals the 44 Mag. I color my hot rodded 45 Colt loads RED so I don't inadvertently load them in my SAAs or toggle links. 1 1 Quote
Widder, SASS #59054 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Another GREAT powder for stout .44 Mag and .45 Colt is LilGun. Hey Lumpy.....those handholds you mentioned will keep Godzilla out of your back yard... And Griff makes a great point about having those hot loads (.44 mag and .45 Colt) specially marked to ensure you don't use them in the wrong firearm. ..........Widder 1 Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 2 minutes ago, Widder, SASS #59054 said: Hey Lumpy.....those handholds you mentioned will keep Godzilla out of your back yard... ..........Widder For my Freedom Arms 83 in .454 Casull. I load 31gn of 110 pushing a 300gn bullet. 😂 Average MV from the 4 3/4" bbl is 1500fps. 1 1 Quote
Rooster Ron Wayne Posted September 19 Posted September 19 I have loaded 44 mag hotter then that myself. Im not telling you how hot to load your loads. You should start at least 10% below max and work up your own loads and know what they do yourself. I usually use Winchester Large Pistol primers for all my 44 rounds ( Hot or Mild ) that's all you need . 1 Quote
Tall John Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 (edited) Alright fellers, powder smells, looks and burns good! next problem is that after setting up my press and loading some dummy rounds (1.60” OAL) that chamber in both my 1894 and my 629, I can’t get more than three rounds into the magazine of my 1894? I can load up choice 44 mag 240RnFp cowboy rounds but they are only 1.55”. I can also load up 44 spls with no issue. not enuff crimp? choice 👇 Edited September 19 by Tall John Finished post Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 (edited) Try more crimp on the top ones. Suggest you buy a chamber gage. Clean the magazine tube and follower. Edited September 19 by The Original Lumpy Gritz 1 Quote
Tall John Posted September 19 Author Posted September 19 (edited) I just replaced the mag spring and follower in July. Mag takes 10 rounds of 44 spl and 10 rounds of OEM ammo. I’m being cheap and trying to seat and roll crimp here with an RCBS seat/crimp die. Will order a Lee FCD and split the operation. Edited September 19 by Tall John 1 Quote
Widder, SASS #59054 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Tall John, I ain't saying that this is your problem, but I have experienced similar situations while working on a few Marlins from previous years. There is a rare situation with the 1894 Marlin that rears its ugly head while pushing rounds thru the loading gate that causes the RIM of your previous loaded round to push downward and snag on the front edge of the portal and prevent the round at the loading gate to push in. And this situation is caused by the bullet style being used. I'm gonna PM you my phone number if you think this is your problem and I can better advise you over the phone on how to fix it. Feel free to call me anytime. ..........Widder 1 3 Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 19 Posted September 19 58 minutes ago, Tall John said: I just replaced the mag spring and follower in July. Mag takes 10 rounds of 44 spl and 10 rounds of OEM ammo. I’m being cheap and trying to seat and roll crimp here with an RCBS seat/crimp die. Will order a Lee FCD and split the operation. Do NOT, seat and crimp on the same stage! 1 Quote
Tall John Posted September 20 Author Posted September 20 56 minutes ago, The Original Lumpy Gritz said: Do NOT, seat and crimp on the same stage! im learning that… 3 Quote
Griff Posted September 20 Posted September 20 17 hours ago, The Original Lumpy Gritz said: Do NOT, seat and crimp on the same stage! 17 hours ago, Tall John said: im learning that… Old wives tale. Properly adjusted dies do the seat/crimp function just fine. I've tried a Lee FCD because I was told it made more accurate rifle ammo. At least with my rifle/ammo combination I found that claim to be false, found no difference between my combo seat/crimp ammo and ammo that thru separate steps with the Lee FCD. I will concede its usefulness for cases that vary in length, i.e. one doesn't trim brass. But, that's rarely an issue with straight walled brass, until one gets into the extreme number of reloadings, especially with cartridges that headspace on the case mouth. 3 1 Quote
Billy Boots, # 20282 LTG-Regulator Posted September 20 Posted September 20 23 grains of H110 behind most any 240 gr bullet was very common and competitive load back in my days of IHMSA. I used 240 Sierra often and got in shot off one year at major match versus a traveling buddy,. Can't remember the exact shot-off targets, possibly chickens at 150 or 200 but regardless. Rick and I went into I believe third bank tied and I was running out of ammo. I borrowed five of his ammo H110/23 and 240 Speers to finish. That was one time I beat him in Int revolver class. As I remember another shooter in AA or AAA class shot a perfect score (40) so won Overall in Revolver. I still load 23/H110 in 44 mag for my S&W 29, Dan Wesson, and T/C 14". Any 240 grain bullet seems to work well. 3 Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 20 Posted September 20 21 minutes ago, Griff said: Old wives tale. Properly adjusted dies do the seat/crimp function just fine. I've tried a Lee FCD because I was told it made more accurate rifle ammo. At least with my rifle/ammo combination I found that claim to be false, found no difference between my combo seat/crimp ammo and ammo that thru separate steps with the Lee FCD. I will concede its usefulness for cases that vary in length, i.e. one doesn't trim brass. But, that's rarely an issue with straight walled brass, until one gets into the extreme number of reloadings, especially with cartridges that headspace on the case mouth. Well, you're the exception then 🤔 I learned to seat and crimp in 2 separate stages back in my NRA Bullseye dayz. The target proved it to be the way to go. 😉 Quote
Chantry Posted September 20 Posted September 20 On 9/18/2026 at 9:03 PM, Tall John said: I inherited a very old can of Hodgdon H110 that is sealed and appears in very new condition. Previous owner said it had been stored in climate control home. Assuming that it isn’t red or abnormally aromatic when I open the can and burns vigorously when ignited with a match, I’m thinking about loading up some 240 grain Nosler JHPs in brand new Starline brass. The published min/max published load data only has a 1 grain spread between the min/max loads (corrected 23-24 grains) Primer recommendation is Rem 2 1/2 (LPP’s). I have CCI’s, WRE’s and FED LPP’s. 1. Would you try loading with this old powder? 2. if yes, which primer Brand would you choose? 3. Assuming I start with the min load, Would you test fire through a Marlin 1894 rifle or a S&W 6” 629? (Load data is the same for handgun or rifle.) any other thoughts? (obviously these would not be for SASS) I like H110. I will note that you should a current reloading manual as sometimes the max load is less now than it used to be. H110 is powder that is one of those that has been reduced. A load used with a 200 grain bullet some 20+ years ago is now OVER max according to a much more current Lyman manual. LInk directly to the Hogdon online reloading for .44 mag: Reloading Data Center – Hodgdon Reloading Data Center 2 1 1 Quote
Griff Posted September 20 Posted September 20 42 minutes ago, The Original Lumpy Gritz said: Well, you're the exception then 🤔 I learned to seat and crimp in 2 separate stages back in my NRA Bullseye dayz. The target proved it to be the way to go. 😉 I don't see how. Lee didn't introduce their FCD until 1991. What'd folks do prior to that? I shot Bullseye in the early '70s. Being in the military, I simply shot what they supplied, normally ball ammo. Quit when I got out. I didn't start reloading until 1972, mostly 44Spl/Mag & .30-30. I didn't start reloading 38/357 & 45 Colt until 1973/4 and 45 Auto in 1975. All of the above were seated/crimped in one step. Yes, getting dies adjusted properly can be a tedious process. But, it's far from impossible. Frankly, if my impatient self can do it... 'nuff said. 1 Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted September 20 Posted September 20 20 minutes ago, Griff said: I don't see how. Lee didn't introduce their FCD until 1991. What'd folks do prior to that? I shot Bullseye in the early '70s. Being in the military, I simply shot what they supplied, normally ball ammo. Quit when I got out. I didn't start reloading until 1972, mostly 44Spl/Mag & .30-30. I didn't start reloading 38/357 & 45 Colt until 1973/4 and 45 Auto in 1975. All of the above were seated/crimped in one step. Yes, getting dies adjusted properly can be a tedious process. But, it's far from impossible. Frankly, if my impatient self can do it... 'nuff said. Started loading in 1967 when no secondary size dies existed. Quote
Tall John Posted September 20 Author Posted September 20 4 hours ago, Chantry said: I like H110. I will note that you should a current reloading manual as sometimes the max load is less now than it used to be. H110 is powder that is one of those that has been reduced. A load used with a 200 grain bullet some 20+ years ago is now OVER max according to a much more current Lyman manual. LInk directly to the Hogdon online reloading for .44 mag: Reloading Data Center – Hodgdon Reloading Data Center The data from my original post came from the Hodgdon load data website Quote
Vail Vigilante Posted September 21 Posted September 21 Just one thing about old powders, which I learned from Dillon. If it has bee subjected to freeze-thaw cycles, this can be a problem. Rust in the top of the can indicate a problem. Start at minimum. 1 Quote
Eyesa Horg Posted September 21 Posted September 21 Surprisingly, when I got into SASS and started reloading again in 2012; I finally found my powder and primers that had been miss placed since we moved here in 2005. It was purchased in the late 90s and I thought it all made it into the house! Unfortunately it was in the attic of the garage, rut- roh! 30 below zero in the winter and over 115 in the summer for 6 years. The powder, mostly 231 smelled OK, so loaded some up. All 4K primers and 4# of powder worked just fine, phew!! Lucky I think! Quote
Griff Posted September 21 Posted September 21 (edited) Moisture is what kills powder... tightly sealed and out of direct weather is fine. Most of my powder is stored in an old refrigerator out in my unheated, uncooled workshop/pole barn. Some has been there for 35 winters and will shortly be 35 full summers. I load approximately 10 rounds of 7mmRemMag per year with the same can on IMR4350... no problems so far. Loaded ammo comes inside the house. Edited September 21 by Griff 2 Quote
Tall John Posted September 23 Author Posted September 23 Final update: my issue with not being able to insert more than three rounds in my 1894’s mag was not lack of crimp or it being dirty, thanks to Mr. Widder, we discovered that the longer 44mag case rim was catching on the left side of the magazine “portal” so with advice from Widder, I polished the 9:00 leading edge of the portal going in from the bbl end vs the receiver end which has proven to solve my loading problem. (pics before polishing) Second, per Mr. Griff’s earlier comment, it is very possible to get a very good roll crimp out of a combination seat/crimp die IF the die is designed to do so!. Half of the bullets in the pic we’re done with an FCD and the other half with the RCBS SEAT/Crimp die. note, these 240gr Nosler JHP dummy rounds have been cycled through the rifle multiple times thus the slight deformation of the soft lead tips fr hitting the floor. Book calls for a 1.60” OAL thus why the bullet cannelure still shows in this 1.27-8” brand new Starline brass. 1 1 Quote
Widder, SASS #59054 Posted September 23 Posted September 23 (edited) For everyone involved in this topic, the particular message below was shared with Tall John prior to our phone conversation last night (Tuesday night). His rifle gremlin was very similar to others I have experienced, not only in .44 caliber but other caliber 1894's. Although not common, the portal entrance can cause some weird effects while loading thru the loading gate. If anyone wants to know more info on this issue, just ask on this thread in order for others to see any added comments. Tall John, I ain't saying that this is your problem, but I have experienced similar situations while working on a few Marlins from previous years. There is a rare situation with the 1894 Marlin that rears its ugly head while pushing rounds thru the loading gate that causes the RIM of your previous loaded round to push downward and snag on the front edge of the portal and prevent the round at the loading gate to push in. And this situation is caused by the bullet style being used. I'm gonna PM you my phone number if you think this is your problem and I can better advise you over the phone on how to fix it. Feel free to call me anytime. ..........Widder Edited September 24 by Widder, SASS #59054 3 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.