Brock Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Does a subs speed depend on depth? Is higher pressure a factor? Quote
Tucker McNeely Posted June 9 Posted June 9 The deeper the sub is the less chance for cavitation at the screw a higher propeller speeds. So not really a speed factor but less chance for cavitation and the faster the sub can go underwater while making less noise. Quote
Calamity Kris Posted June 9 Posted June 9 I'm sorry to derail things but I had to share this. I've been working 12+ hour days for the last couple of weeks. Needless to say, I'm kinda punchy and REALLY tired. I swear the title to the thread was "Sub Speed UNDERWEAR" I'm going to bed now. Good night..... 1 9 1 Quote
Cowtown Scout, SASS #53540 L Posted June 9 Posted June 9 15 minutes ago, Calamity Kris said: I'm sorry to derail things but I had to share this. I've been working 12+ hour days for the last couple of weeks. Needless to say, I'm kinda punchy and REALLY tired. I swear the title to the thread was "Sub Speed UNDERWEAR" I'm going to bed now. Good night..... OK how long before you can retire from that job? 3 1 Quote
WOLFY Posted June 10 Posted June 10 in the days of electric diesel subs they made way better time on the surface 1 Quote
Sgt. C.J. Sabre, SASS #46770 Posted June 10 Posted June 10 12 minutes ago, WOLFY said: in the days of electric diesel subs they made way better time on the surface Diesel subs were more of a ship that could submerge. They looked and sailed like surface ships. Modern nuclear subs are designed to sail submerged. They only surface when needed. This will give you at least a visual idea: 2 1 Quote
Trailrider #896 Posted June 10 Posted June 10 Prior to the creation of the Skipjack-class "boats" with the hydrodynamically-shaped hulls, submarines were really only submersibles. That is, they were faster surfaced than submerged. The first nuclear-powered subs still had hulls that were not ideally suited to submerged speed. Of course, the nuclear power meant they didn't have to surface to recharge their batteries. I'm not sure if recent diesel-electric subs are shaped like the nukes. They tend to be quieter submerged, so they are harder to detect, Some of you modern submariner types can comment better than I can, Quote
Calamity Kris Posted June 10 Posted June 10 9 hours ago, Cowtown Scout, SASS #53540 L said: OK how long before you can retire from that job? I'm slated for the end of October, unless the stress puts me in the hospital again......... 4 Quote
Michigan Slim Posted June 10 Posted June 10 I asked a friend who served many years in the silent service how fast his boats were. He was on a boomer mostly. He told me it was classified. Would not say. Quote
Brock Posted June 10 Author Posted June 10 my question is, does the speed change with greater depth? probly also classiied, eh? Quote
Colorado Coffinmaker Posted June 10 Posted June 10 I don't know the Depth/Speed differential. I do know the widely published "speed" potentials are nowhere near accurate. Butt and However, the first True operational submarine was the German type XXI. That boat was designed and intended to be faster when submerged than when on the surface and it was. The Type XXI could outrun Destroyer Escorts when submerged and running on it's electric motors. As a further aside, the Type XXI also had huge influence on the design of our Nautilus which sorta copied the hull form of the Type XXI. Quote
Big Sage, SASS #49891 Life Posted June 10 Posted June 10 6 hours ago, Michigan Slim said: I asked a friend who served many years in the silent service how fast his boats were. He was on a boomer mostly. He told me it was classified. Would not say. I worked in classified programs for the last 20 years of my work. When I retired I was debriefed and told unless otherwise notified everything that was classified was still classified and I couldn't talk about it. I still have a clearance 20 years later. 1 Quote
Tucker McNeely Posted June 11 Posted June 11 On 6/10/2026 at 10:00 AM, Brock said: my question is, does the speed change with greater depth? probly also classiied, eh? I was qualified as a throttle man onboard two nuclear subs. Not classified , it’s physics. Short answer, no. 1 Quote
Brock Posted June 11 Author Posted June 11 33 minutes ago, Tucker McNeely said: I was qualified as a throttle man onboard two nuclear subs. Not classified , it’s physics. Short answer, no. thank you Quote
watab kid Posted June 12 Posted June 12 my FIL is no longer with us so i couldn't ask - first crew nautilus and career navy , he was a cold war submariner Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.