John Kloehr Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 VIPD and Defendant Brooks continue to enforce Virgin Islands laws nearly identical to those struck down by the Supreme Court in Bruen. VI Defendants require that applicants submit to intrusive and warrantless home searches as a condition of obtaining a gun permit. They demand that applicants unnecessarily spend money to install a safe and further require the safe to be bolted either to the floor or wall of applicant’s home as a condition of granting a permit, even though in Heller, the Supreme Court held that a similar requirement is unconstitutional. See 554 U.S. at 635 (holding that the District of Columbia’s “prohibition against [possessing a] lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense” violates the Second Amendment) (emphasis added). VI Defendants unreasonably delay the processing of applications, even from those individuals who are willing to comply with blatantly unconstitutional requirements. From: https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1420996/dl 2 2 Quote
Blackwater 53393 Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 Hopefully awarded certiority and expedited! If settled as DOJ requests, it would serve as excellent precedent for future litigation!! 1 Quote
John Kloehr Posted December 16, 2025 Author Posted December 16, 2025 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Blackwater 53393 said: Hopefully awarded certiority and expedited! If settled as DOJ requests, it would serve as excellent precedent for future litigation!! The suit is filed in the Virgin Island Federal Court. VIPD will have to respond. Not sure if I can find public access to the docket, or if it will even be available on Pacer (and I do not pay for an account there). Will track it as best I can. Lots of "hate" in (other) forum discussions as to why the DOJ is taking this action in a territory when there are plenty more issues here in the states. I'm looking at it as an easy win for gun rights plus there may be federalism issues in the territories the DOJ wants to clearly establish. Edited December 16, 2025 by John Kloehr 1 3 Quote
Blackwater 53393 Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 Are the other forums pro or anti gun?? 1 Quote
John Kloehr Posted December 16, 2025 Author Posted December 16, 2025 29 minutes ago, Blackwater 53393 said: Are the other forums pro or anti gun?? Pro. The discussion is not that the DOJ is wrong to take this action in VI, more a matter of why take this action when there are more problems closer to home (Illinois, etc.). 1 2 Quote
Blackwater 53393 Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 Some folks are too obtuse to recognize that a positive ruling in this case would stand as precedent in all similar cases!?!?!😡 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.