Misty Moonshine Posted January 22 Posted January 22 Hi everyone, SASS has received a packet full of notices of "Unlicensed Use" of Imagery owned by several different companies- the Associated Press, The Canadian Press, Epa Images, Hearst Holdings, and Reuters. It seems that by our forum members here copying and posting comments containing images and memes containing images- as well as cartoons - without express permission from these companies has now resulted in some pretty steep fines for SASS. Because the infringement detail was so vast, after spending far too much time in an attempt to hunt them all down, I have been forced to remove certain threads entirely- the "Sticky cartoon thread" and the "funny photos add some" threads entirely. Additionally, I've hidden about a dozen other comments and posts with imagery that were listed in the notices we received. How do we move forward? I'm not sure yet... I don't want to remove the ability to share pictures within the forums, but we cannot (and will not) be subject to fines like this again. It may be time to start restricting access to the SASS Wire Forums to active SASS MEMBERS ONLY in an effort to maintain our sanctuary here... I will be consulting with our legal team as well as our Advisory Board on the best action moving forward. In the meantime, I'm asking everyone to PLEASE not copy and paste photos or memes from any internet news or image source. Thanks in advance, Misty Moonshine 3 7 Quote
Eyesa Horg Posted January 22 Posted January 22 Thank you for the explanation Misty. Must admit I'm surprised that content taken off the web wouldn't already be public. Good Luck with this issue. God Bless. It's always sumpin these days! 1 Quote
Warden Callaway Posted January 22 Posted January 22 Well Poo! (My mother-in-law's only swear word.) 2 Quote
John Kloehr Posted January 22 Posted January 22 I'm not understanding the "fines" part. I'm assuming DMCA takedown notices. Yes, then the material does need to come down if it is owned by a copyright holder. Then notify the copyright holder. Should be done at that point, but maybe things have changed since I last came across this. Quote
Tyrel Cody Posted January 22 Posted January 22 2 hours ago, Misty Moonshine said: It may be time to start restricting access to the SASS Wire Forums to active SASS MEMBERS ONLY Is the Forum Software connected to a Membership Database now, making it easy to restrict to active SASS members? I’ve long thought the Classified should be locked down in this manner(could help prevent scammers if hidden from public view). My opinion only active members should be able to post For Sale or Want To Buy Ads. The Saloon should probably have been hidden from the public a long time ago as well. As to the Main SASS Wire it would be good(my opinion) to allow guests to post questions there and learn things from. Perhaps the forum software could restrict posting pictures by “guests”. Quote
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted January 22 Posted January 22 Misty, the fact we are a gun friendly 'sight' comes into play here, I'm sure! Sorry you have to deal with this nonsense, not like you and your crew don't already have your hands full...... 2 Quote
Dogmeat Dad, SASS #48563L Posted January 22 Posted January 22 (edited) My Church got hit with the same BS not that long ago. I signed up for a IStock account so I could use the "purchased" images for our Cowboy match applications. This is about to get a whole lot worse as Getty Images/iStock is in the process of purchasing Shutterstock. These companies are buying up the rights to as much digital imagery as they can and then going after anyone they think has money. They contact the person who posted the original image, pay them some small fee and possibly residuals, then charge $15 or more to each person that uses it. They are using AI technology to search for these images out on the world wide web and that is what is making all of this possible. The result, I think, is that we will see be a significant drop in the use of imagery on websites world wide. If they keep this up, we will be back to the old BBS days.... Edited January 22 by Dogmeat Dad, SASS #48563L 'Cause I Don't Spel Two Gud! Quote
Captain Bill Burt Posted January 22 Posted January 22 It’s unfortunate you’re having to deal with this Misty. I don’t recall posting images like those you describe, but it’s certainly possible that at some point I have. If we retain the ability to post pictures or video in the future I will be careful not to post anything that has the slightest chance of being copyrighted. I’m sure once other members are aware of the issue they will also exercise due care. 2 Quote
John Kloehr Posted January 23 Posted January 23 I am going to be more careful. Even with stuff pulled from the book of faces or through a search because I am after a specific thing as a response. I'm sure some of the things I posted are ending up in the sweep for which I apologize; copyright violation was certainly never my intent. There are some things I don't think would be a problem. When asking about a product, grabbing a picture from Dillon or Midsouth or Amazon is not likely to be a problem IMO. Memes? I'm not even sure background image content from meme generators is safe. I will have to think and look deeper. Is the lady and the cat now off limits? There are a bunch of "standard" meme images with any variable amount of text. Also Star Trek TNG with Picard, Riker, Deanna, Data, etc... Those are all probably under copyright but are incredibly common in the wild. I still can not see how "fines" apply. A web host gets a DMCA takedown notice, it complies with the takedown notice, it informs the complainant the content is no longer there, done. No "fines." 1 Quote
Texas Jack Black Posted January 23 Posted January 23 19 hours ago, John Kloehr said: I am going to be more careful. Even with stuff pulled from the book of faces or through a search because I am after a specific thing as a response. I'm sure some of the things I posted are ending up in the sweep for which I apologize; copyright violation was certainly never my intent. There are some things I don't think would be a problem. When asking about a product, grabbing a picture from Dillon or Midsouth or Amazon is not likely to be a problem IMO. Memes? I'm not even sure background image content from meme generators is safe. I will have to think and look deeper. Is the lady and the cat now off limits? There are a bunch of "standard" meme images with any variable amount of text. Also Star Trek TNG with Picard, Riker, Deanna, Data, etc... Those are all probably under copyright but are incredibly common in the wild. I still can not see how "fines" apply. A web host gets a DMCA takedown notice, it complies with the takedown notice, it informs the complainant the content is no longer there, done. No "fines." Why does a gun site forum will grown adults need to post foolish pictures. ? Quote
Eyesa Horg Posted January 23 Posted January 23 For our entertainment in the Saloon! And not all pictures are meant to be funny, some are educational/informative. 2 1 Quote
Cowtown Scout, SASS #53540 L Posted January 23 Posted January 23 24 minutes ago, Texas Jack Black said: Why does a gun site forum will grown adults need to post foolish pictures. ? On this forum those are posted in the Saloon. I am also on two other gun related forums and they both have areas that post non-firearm related threads. 1 2 Quote
Texas Jack Black Posted January 23 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Eyesa Horg said: For our entertainment in the Saloon! And not all pictures are meant to be funny, some are educational/informative. unfortunately causing issues with the main office $$$ Best Wishes 1 Quote
Eyesa Horg Posted January 23 Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Texas Jack Black said: unfortunately causing issues with the main office $$$ Best Wishes But ya can't really blame posters that were never warned and were posting things off other public sites. How was anybody to know. And until Misty and the legal team deal with it. Expense is the unknown and may just be settled as they were never warned. It's always the heavy fist first. Time will tell, in the meantime,we have now been warned. 4 Quote
Indy Kid, SASS #4638 Posted January 24 Posted January 24 Here is an article written by a lawyer about copyrights. https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/copyright-fair-use-and-how-it-works-for-online-images/ . Basically it says any picture that is taken, any thing that is written and any thing that is drawn or is painted is copyrighted the instant it is created. It does not have to be registered to be copyrighted. So with some exceptions anytime you cut and paste on the internet there is a good chance you are breaking copyright laws. Indy 1 Quote
Cholla Posted January 24 Posted January 24 There is a new industry of people searching for copyright violations. Some of the magazines I write have been hit with this because we assume something is in the public use domain. Now, if I need an old photo I have to list where I got it such as the Library of Congress or the Smithsonian. The editors prefer I take my own photos. 1 3 Quote
Sedalia Dave Posted January 25 Posted January 25 3 hours ago, Cholla said: There is a new industry of people searching for copyright violations. Some of the magazines I write have been hit with this because we assume something is in the public use domain. Now, if I need an old photo I have to list where I got it such as the Library of Congress or the Smithsonian. The editors prefer I take my own photos. Yep. First it was Patent Trolls. Now AI has created the Copyright Troll. 1 Quote
Bladesmith, SASS 113085 Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) On 1/22/2025 at 4:49 PM, John Kloehr said: I'm not understanding the "fines" part That was my thinking too. I’m not attorney so maybe there’s some nuance I’m missing but it appears the DMCA provides protection from liability for forum owners in cases where members may have posted copyrighted material, provided the forum owner had not been previously notified and advised to remove it. Referencing https://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf, page 11 the section beginning with “Limitation for Information Residing on Systems”. I’m sure the legal team will give good guidance, but definitely worth investigating since it wouldn’t surprise me to learn an attorney tried to enact something like fines without following actual procedures. It also strikes me as a little odd that so many large and diverse entities would all have the same legal representation and would all notify SASS simultaneously, but that’s just my view from the peanut gallery! Edited January 31 by Bladesmith, SASS 113085 1 Quote
Pat Riot Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM On 1/23/2025 at 3:31 PM, Texas Jack Black said: Why does a gun site forum will grown adults need to post foolish pictures. ? Where do you see grown adults here? 2 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.