Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

We're watching the morning news.  A segment about the high cost of The Meal.  Wife quipped,  "Solve the problem the traditional way.   Make Native Americans bring all the food."

 

Which inspired this thread.

 

FB_IMG_1637876646052.thumb.jpg.7f977d45e9cf7b7be96c28ad4cca1899.jpg

 

FB_IMG_1637866059594.jpg.e7a492d7af00521572bacfbab189606d.jpg

 

And, one serious image:

FB_IMG_1637861639485.jpg.dd2642be40875314c7e433b8dbb2cd1c.jpg

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Living out among farms, seems the turkeys know something is up. One of them is trying to imitate a rooster. Pitiful attempt, every morning now I hear "gobble-gobble-doo, gobble-gobble-doo."

  • Haha 6
Posted
6 minutes ago, Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984 said:

B-b-b-it the Puritans came ten years after the first Thanksgiving an those sanctimonious prigs probably wouldn’t have celebrated anything.

 

Sanctimonious?  Yes.

Prigs? Maybe not so much, considering the number of court records of trials for adultery,  fornication,  and various other carnal shenanigans,  they seem to have been a rather lusty lot.  Also they were heartily in favor of frequent marital relations as helping with couples bonding and harmony within the marriage 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I thought the Puritans showed up in 1620, on the Mayflower.

 

Did they lie to me in American history class?

Posted

I would not have done well living amongst the Puritans and Quakers and such. I can’t stand uptight pious sonsof….Hey! Look at that turkey!

image.thumb.jpeg.760b9825aeff73a85c659d0816a34659.jpeg

  • Haha 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Subdeacon Joe said:

 

Sanctimonious?  Yes.

Prigs? Maybe not so much, considering the number of court records of trials for adultery,  fornication,  and various other carnal shenanigans,  they seem to have been a rather lusty lot.  Also they were heartily in favor of frequent marital relations as helping with couples bonding and harmony within the marriage 

 

   ...... perhaps they should've had television sets.  🙃

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Alpo said:

I thought the Puritans showed up in 1620, on the Mayflower.

 

Did they lie to me in American history class?

Perhaps your rememberer?

 

pilgrims, Plymouth Rock, 1620

Puritans, Boston, 1630

Edited by Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984
Posted (edited)

Well, American history class has been a long time ago, but I'm pretty sure they taught us that the Puritans were the pilgrims. Same people.

 

Like black people and African Americans. Or Indians and native Americans. Different names for the same group of people.

 

Added: Church of England ran them out of England because the C-of-E did not agree with their religious practices, and they went to Holland. But the Dutch weren't all that happy with them either, so they left Holland and came here on the Mayflower.

 

Ain't that the way it happened?

Edited by Alpo
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Cypress Sun said:

The ultimate in Thanksgiving humor!

 

 

The funniest thing EVER recorded anywhere was at the end when Carlson made his statement about thinking turkeys could fly.

 

 After all these years it still makes me laugh until tears come.

Edited by Forty Rod SASS 3935
  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Alpo said:

Well, American history class has been a long time ago, but I'm pretty sure they taught us that the Puritans were the pilgrims. Same people.

 

Like black people and African Americans. Or Indians and native Americans. Different names for the same group of people.

 

Added: Church of England ran them out of England because the C-of-E did not agree with their religious practices, and they went to Holland. But the Dutch weren't all that happy with them either, so they left Holland and came here on the Mayflower.

 

Ain't that the way it happened?

Pilgrims were living in exile in Holland before coming to America.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Heck, John Wayne encountered Pilgrims from the 1860’s to the 1900’s. That’s 230-270 years after they landed. :D

  • Haha 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Subdeacon Joe said:

 

Sanctimonious?  Yes.

Prigs? Maybe not so much, considering the number of court records of trials for adultery,  fornication,  and various other carnal shenanigans,  they seem to have been a rather lusty lot.  Also they were heartily in favor of frequent marital relations as helping with couples bonding and harmony within the marriage 

SO; they were pearl clutching all this time........I knew it.

 

Posted

From history.com

https://www.history.com/topics/colonial-america/puritanism

 

The main difference between the Pilgrims and the Puritans is that the Puritans did not consider themselves separatists. They called themselves “nonseparating congregationalists,” by which they meant that they had not repudiated the Church of England as a false church. But in practice they acted–from the point of view of Episcopalians and even Presbyterians at home–exactly as the separatists were acting. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Posted
10 hours ago, Pat Riot said:

I would not have done well living amongst the Puritans and Quakers and such. I can’t stand uptight pious sonsof….Hey! Look at that turkey!

image.thumb.jpeg.760b9825aeff73a85c659d0816a34659.jpeg

me either , that really was the reason my father went catholic at my mothers request instead of raising me methodist , 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.