Lawdog Dago Dom Posted September 27, 2024 Posted September 27, 2024 Hawaii Homeowner Arrested After Stopping Violent Neighbor, Released After Self-Defense Ruling - The Truth About Guns
John Kloehr Posted September 28, 2024 Posted September 28, 2024 The law can be twisted in so many ways. Hawaii's Federal judges even tried a new tack recently, the 2nd should be interpreted by Hawaii as to what it meant when Hawaii became a state rather than when the US became a nation. SCOTUS needs to slap these judges. Hawaii was bound by the original meaning as a condition of statehood. And what is this "properly registered" firearm bullcrap? Since when is it government's business to demand anything other than verifying its law-abiding citizens are armed? The state does not need a registration, only at most merely a checkbox confirming arms absent some religious objection to arms.
Blackwater 53393 Posted September 28, 2024 Posted September 28, 2024 AND ANOTHER CASE OF A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN STOPPING A BAD GUY WITH A GUN!! The cops and officials should be whatever is ten times as bad as ashamed!!
Sedalia Dave Posted October 1, 2024 Posted October 1, 2024 On 9/27/2024 at 7:15 PM, John Kloehr said: The law can be twisted in so many ways. Hawaii's Federal judges even tried a new tack recently, the 2nd should be interpreted by Hawaii as to what it meant when Hawaii became a state rather than when the US became a nation. SCOTUS needs to slap these judges. Hawaii was bound by the original meaning as a condition of statehood. And what is this "properly registered" firearm bullcrap? Since when is it government's business to demand anything other than verifying its law-abiding citizens are armed? The state does not need a registration, only at most merely a checkbox confirming arms absent some religious objection to arms. The state has NO BUSINESS WHAT SO EVER about whether or not a citizen of the US has bought, owns or formerly owned a firearm. Their desire to do so is why they are pushing for universal background checks. This way they'll know whose door to knock down once the far left democrats gain enough power to abolish the 2nd Amendment. After which, they'll abolish the 1st Amendment and then the entire Constitution.
Blackwater 53393 Posted October 1, 2024 Posted October 1, 2024 4 hours ago, Sedalia Dave said: The state has NO BUSINESS WHAT SO EVER about whether or not a citizen of the US has bought, owns or formerly owned a firearm. Their desire to do so is why they are pushing for universal background checks. This way they'll know whose door to knock down once the far left democrats gain enough power to abolish the 2nd Amendment. After which, they'll abolish the 1st Amendment and then the entire Constitution. I agree in part! The First Amendment is already under full on frontal assault!! Not to mention several other amendments as well as parts of the main body of the Constitution! That we are still armed and they can’t be sure of who or what may be behind the next door is the only thing holding them back RIGHT NOW! EDIT: I caught this on another thread…
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.