Lawdog Dago Dom Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 Inland manufactured November 1944. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watab kid Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 yes , that was a good deal , do you still have it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpo Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 That was an interesting description. UNSERVICEABLE, which is a term that means to me that the item - whatever it is - cannot be used as it was designed to be used, SAFE TO FIRE CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION. If it's unserviceable, it seems like it would not be safe to fire any ammunition - conventional or otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdog Dago Dom Posted May 13, 2022 Author Share Posted May 13, 2022 9 hours ago, watab kid said: yes , that was a good deal , do you still have it ? Yes I do. Even have some of the first ammo he bought for it, stamped 1951. Now our youngest (27) son is hooked on it. Older son likes the Glock/AR world. This one loves his Browning Hi-Power from the 70's and the carbine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Alpo said: That was an interesting description. UNSERVICEABLE, which is a term that means to me that the item - whatever it is - cannot be used as it was designed to be used, SAFE TO FIRE CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION. If it's unserviceable, it seems like it would not be safe to fire any ammunition - conventional or otherwise. If I remember correctly the military used to deem guns "unserviceable" if it had been refurbed once before or they don't wish to waste money on refurbing a gun. It doesn't mean that it doesn't work, it may mean that they just don't want to spend money on it to refurbish or repair it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.