Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Never thought of it in those terms


Recommended Posts

I'm not sure whether that's supposed to be pro or anti. It's confusing.

 

But, back when the Second Amendment was conceived, that would-be mass-killer would be shot while reloading his gun. Because so many other people had a gun.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is anti since the shooter could be tackled while reloading. This because nobody but the shooter would be armed.

 

The pro side realizes he would also have a couple already loaded pistols in his belt. The pro side would also be armed and simply shoot him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a pound of explosives in his powder horn. And likely a cannon at home.

 

The people who wrote the 2a brought their own artillery and ima supposed to believe it only applies to rifles and handguns?

 

The Puckle gun and rifles and pistols firing superposed loads existed for repeating flintlocks as well as drilling guns.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.