Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 Thanks to Communist Northam and his craven monions, SCOTUS should be very busy soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life Posted January 8, 2020 Author Share Posted January 8, 2020 OOOPs!!! minions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 32 minutes ago, Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life said: monions Would that be "moronic minions?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life Posted January 8, 2020 Author Share Posted January 8, 2020 I'm trying to recall my first master degree. I think imbecillic minions might be a better fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Mud Marine,SASS#54686 Life said: I'm trying to recall my first master degree. I think imbecillic minions might be a better fit. But that doesn't fit your typo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-BAR #18287 Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Code of Virginia Table of Contents » Title 49. Oaths, Affirmations and Bonds » Chapter 1. Oaths and Affirmations » § 49-1. Form of general oath required of officers Section Print PDF email § 49-1. Form of general oath required of officers. Every person before entering upon the discharge of any function as an officer of this Commonwealth shall take and subscribe the following oath: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as ____________________ according to the best of my ability, (so help me God)." Any person reappointed to any office filled by gubernatorial appointment for a subsequent term to begin immediately upon expiration of an existing term shall not be required to renew the oath set out in this section; however, the original oath taken shall continue in effect with respect to the subsequent term. Const., § 34; Code 1919, § 269; 1936, p. 49; 1971, Ex. Sess., c. 16; 1980, c. 320; 1988, c. 255. Since Governor Northam is not fulfilling his oath of office by not supporting the Constitution of the United States, shouldn't that be dereliction of duty and grounds for removal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgavin Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Unless.... SCOTUS declines to hear the case.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.