Subdeacon Joe Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G W Wade Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 WOWSER< I never knew GW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Ooooh...I want one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smuteye John SASS#24774 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Ooooh...I don’t want one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eyesa Horg Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 10 hours ago, Smuteye John SASS#24774 said: Looks kinda like an assault patriot. Is that brass muzzle cap legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rye Miles #13621 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 This isn't funny, it's just pretty cool!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smuteye John SASS#24774 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trailrider #896 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 IF the definition of an "assault rifle" is an arm that fires more rapidly than the standard military long arm of the day, but uses ammunition less powerful, for closeup work, then both the Spencer and the Henry were the assault weapons of the Civil War and shortly thereafter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rye Miles #13621 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 38 minutes ago, Trailrider #896 said: IF the definition of an "assault rifle" is an arm that fires more rapidly than the standard military long arm of the day, but uses ammunition less powerful, for closeup work, then both the Spencer and the Henry were the assault weapons of the Civil War and shortly thereafter! If I use my assault weapon to defend myself is it not then a Defense weapon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Riot Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 4 hours ago, Rye Miles #13621 said: This isn't funny, it's just pretty cool!! That just looks really cool! I just looked them up online. Chiappa makes one for >$2,000. Charles Daly imports one, probably a Chiappa for a similar price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smuteye John SASS#24774 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trailrider #896 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Rye Miles #13621 said: If I use my assault weapon to defend myself is it not then a Defense weapon? Yes, but the anti's aren't trying to ban "defensive weapons"...YET! Just those "evil assault weapons". Wonder what would happen if a military unit just happened to use a replica Winchester M1873 in any sort of military operation? The anti's would promptly brand them all as "assault weapons"! If you owned a reproduction .45-70 Gatling gun and attached an electric motor to the crankshaft, would that make it a machine gun under FFA 34? (Point of historical note: Dr. Gatling actually did this!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted September 29, 2019 Author Share Posted September 29, 2019 4 hours ago, Smuteye John SASS#24774 said: Doesn't have a shoulder thing that goes up so it should be legal in CA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crooked River Pete, SASS 43485 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Subdeacon Joe said: Doesn't have a shoulder thing that goes up so it should be legal in CA. That vertical fore grip is illegal on a pistol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted September 29, 2019 Author Share Posted September 29, 2019 19 minutes ago, Crooked River Pete, SASS 43485 said: That vertical fore grip is illegal on a pistol. But that is a revolver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smuteye John SASS#24774 Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 44 minutes ago, Subdeacon Joe said: But that is a revolver. NFA'34 makes vertical foregrips on handgins illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpo Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 2 hours ago, Trailrider #896 said: If you owned a reproduction .45-70 Gatling gun and attached an electric motor to the crankshaft, would that make it a machine gun under FFA 34? If you mean NFA 34, yes it would. pushing the button that started the electric motor would be considered pulling the trigger. 1 hour ago, Subdeacon Joe said: But that is a revolver. A revolver is a pistol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdeacon Joe Posted September 30, 2019 Author Share Posted September 30, 2019 31 minutes ago, Alpo said: A revolver is a pistol. The definition of a pistol is a handgun that has the chamber integral with the barrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdgun Quail, SASS #63663 Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Oh folks, here is the most fun assault gun I've found. And it's got scary features. But it is deadly and designed to KILL!!! It's almost as much fun as my cannon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.