Charlie T Waite Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 'Just take the 15 million that are out there and buy them back' Link to comment
Blackwater 53393 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 I'd venture a guess that there are way more that 15,000,000 semi-automatic rifles out there that fit his "definition" of assault unacceptable weapons!! If this ever came to pass, the very next instant would bring an attack on single action and single shot rifles and shotguns!! They wouldn't stop until all we had was spoons, sticks, and rocks to protect ourselves with. My immediate pressing question is, "What's lower on the intelligence scale than IDIOT?? This guy may be the poster child for that level!! Link to comment
Dantankerous Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 If I even had such a thing as what the buyback is proposed to do, and I don't know anyone who owns such a thing either, I'm sure they would be happy to sell back an $800 item for $10,000 but probably not much less than that... Link to comment
Tyrel Cody Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 How does someone buy back something that they didn't sell? Link to comment
Dantankerous Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 17 hours ago, Tyrel Cody said: How does someone buy back something that they didn't sell? The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. Link to comment
Tyrel Cody Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Just now, Dantankerous said: The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. AMEN Link to comment
Blackwater 53393 Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Dantankerous said: The terminology certainly is perplexing but then again so is the logic of those who are pushing the confusion terminology. I would also suggest that those who want to chip away at constitutional rights or simply abolish them should just go find another country in which to live. Get the hell out of this one. This last would certainly be best for our nation, but these malefactors would not be in power in another more suitable nation. Their goal is to disarm and subjugate US, leaving themselves in the position of power. In a country already disarmed, they would have to disarm themselves upon arrival, becoming subjects in doing so. Link to comment
Lawdog Dago Dom Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 After you click on article, within it there is a link to the Esquire magazine interview that the article cites. I urge you to read the interview. Link to comment
Nubbins Colt #7802 Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Quote My immediate pressing question is, "What's lower on the intelligence scale than IDIOT?? This guy may be the poster child for that level!! Remember what Mark Twain said: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." Link to comment
Dantankerous Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 This is the guy who said the US Gov't would just nuke gun owners who did not turn in their AR's. WHAAAAAAAAAAT? If he is willing to use the government to mass murder the country's citizens this makes him a mirror image of Hitler, does it not? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.