Why “May-Issue” Must Fail

[Charlie T Waite]

But what about the Second Amendment?

[Subdeacon Joe]

The article starts off with a reference to Schenck.  

“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect of force.” Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)

 

If we translate Schenck to apply to the 2^nd, it would read something like “The most stringent protection of the rights to keep and bear arms would not protect a man in wantonly opening fire in a public place and causing death, injury, and panic.  It does not even protect a man who brandishes a firearm in public with the intent of causing fear and panic among the people.”

 

Also, along the "rights are not unlimited" argument, I've started asking "What are the limits on abortion?"