Charlie T Waite Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 By Ted Sickinger tsickinger@oregonian.com The Oregonian/OregonLive The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries issued a memo this week suggesting that it is illegal for retailers to restrict gun and ammunition sales based on the buyers age. Hannah Brumbles, an 18-year-old from Deer Island in unincorporated Columbia County, filed a complaint with the state after a Walmart store in St. Helen's refused to sell her a rifle or ammunition last February because she was younger than 21. Oregon law allows individuals 18 and older to purchase firearms, but a variety of regional and national retailers, including Walmart, adopted more restrictive policies following the mass shooting in Parkland, Florida. Former student Nikolas Cruz, 19, is accused of killing 17 people, including 14 students and three staff members, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14. Brumbles' complaint alleged that the policy was discriminatory and violated the Oregon constitution. BOLI found that Brumbles did have grounds for the discrimination complaint, and has scheduled a hearing in November where it will hear Walmart's response and formally rule on the matter. Brumbles is seeking damages for physical, mental and emotional distress, which could be as high as $5,000. Walmart will defend its policy. "In February of this year, we reviewed our policy on firearm and ammunition sales and as a result, we raised the age restriction for the purchase of those items to 21," said Randy Hargrove, a company spokesman. "We stand behind our decision and plan to defend it. We are preparing for the November hearing before the administrative law judge." Link to comment
Wrangler Rich SASS #42157 Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 If we made people responsible for their own actions, maybe corporations wouldn't feel the need to restrict individual rights. WR Link to comment
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 Wal-Mart in CA. can't sell guns because when the did. Lot of the guns went missing, and this was a settlement with our DOJ to ward off criminal prosecution of WM. OLG Link to comment
Tennessee Trapper Tom Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 She can serve in the military, carry a weapon and defend our freedoms. Come home, go on with life and have your freedoms restricted by others. I don’t think so. The time is coming Link to comment
The Original Lumpy Gritz Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 When my 3 sons were military. The were issued handguns that they could not buy, or buy the ammo for(9mm)till they were 21yo. One son became a Ranger on his 18th b'day. Yet, one can have a drivers lic at 16- OLG Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.