Bongino Calls Out Miranda Yaver

[Charlie T Waite]

Liberal professor Miranda Yaver challenged Dan Bongino to a debate on Second Amendment rights. She was tough on Twitter, but backed down from a real debate. So Bongino debates her picture and an empty chair – which is basically the same as any debate with a liberal.  Watch Video

 

Charlie

 

 

[Blackwater 53393]

[Subdeacon Joe]

They have only a few stock phrases, even live it is like pulling the string on a Chatty Cathy.  And you have as much chance of getting through to them as you do an empty chair.
I've started asking them if SCOTUS had it wrong in Barnette and Miranda:

 "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491. 

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

: Robert H. Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

and if these lower courts were wrong:

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489. 

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights." Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946