Subdeacon Joe Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/10/what_the_white_mass_shooter_myth_gets_right_and_wrong_about_killers_demographics.html Quote his disparity, which could be thought of as the statistical non-whiteness of mass shootings, is much smaller in magnitude than the one for killings nationwide. Overall murder rates among black Americans are 6.3 times higher than they are for whites, according to a report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The same report suggests white offenders made up just 45.3 percent of everyone who committed homicides between 1980 and 2008. In other words, white Americans may be somewhat underrepresented among mass shooters, but they’re even more underrepresented among all killers. In that limited sense, it would be fair to say that whites are responsible for more public massacres than you might expect. Does that mean their whiteness is a factor in these crimes? Link to comment
Blackwater 53393 Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 If you look closely, the first lie that's offered, and one that is NOT refuted is that the perpetrator "Stephen Paddock SHOT more than 500 people"!! I read the whole article and started on the one that followed and the very first paragraph in that article contained the SAME prevarication!! I pointed out earlier that not contesting these statements would lead to this very thing. I'm sad, but NOT surprised to see that I was correct!! Link to comment
Subdeacon Joe Posted October 7, 2017 Author Share Posted October 7, 2017 I missed that. I guess I was in too much shock of Slate refuting the usual lie that only white men are mass shooters. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.