Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Does a tie matter?


Kirk James

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Blackey Cole said:

You think that you are penalizing the non clean shooter I see as rewarding the cleanest shooter.

Why would you do that?

There is no criteria that says clean is more important than fast.  Or for that matter that fast is more important than clean.

5 seconds on the scoresheet is 5 seconds.  Period.

It does not matter how the time is acquired; be it time spent shooting, miss penalty, procedural, safety, SOG, stage DQ.

The only thing that matters is the cumulative time at the bottom when everything is added up.

If two shooters share the same time, no matter what path they took to get there, then they share the same position on the podium.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an Old West analogy that might help clarify Creekers' position:

 

A woman traveling along in her wagon on the prairie is suddenly attacked by Indians who are whooping and screaming and shooting a boatload of arrows. Fortunately the woman has a gunfighter companion. :wub:

They are trying hard to defend themselves. The gunfighter. Boy is he fast. :o He's unloading his six-shooters at a gattling gun pace, even though he misses several times. :blush:

Meanwhile the woman, though slow and methodical in her aim appears to be knocking off just as many Indians as the gunslinger without a miss. :D

The tribe decides to leave as they are losing too many members. :ph34r:

The woman and the gunfighter celebrate with beans and coffee around the campfire. :wub:

Tally: Woman 20 - Gunfighter 20 ;)

Who was the hero in this scenario. The faster shooter who had more misses, or the woman who was tried and true?

They both survived, therefore they are both WINNERS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Father Kit Cool Gun Garth said:

Here's an Old West analogy that might help clarify Creekers' position:

 

A woman traveling along in her wagon on the prairie is suddenly attacked by Indians who are whooping and screaming and shooting a boatload of arrows. Fortunately the woman has a gunfighter companion. :wub:

They are trying hard to defend themselves. The gunfighter. Boy is he fast. :o He's unloading his six-shooters at a gattling gun pace, even though he misses several times. :blush:

Meanwhile the woman, though slow and methodical in her aim appears to be knocking off just as many Indians as the gunslinger without a miss. :D

The tribe decides to leave as they are losing too many members. :ph34r:

The woman and the gunfighter celebrate with beans and coffee around the campfire. :wub:

Tally: Woman 20 - Gunfighter 20 ;)

Who was the hero in this scenario. The faster shooter who had more misses, or the woman who was tried and true?

They both survived, therefore they are both WINNERS.

 

BUT, if the Woman shot a Chief and the Gunslinger shot the WigWam maker, the Woman wins.

 

If the Gunslinger shot the medicine man and the Woman shot the TeePee designer, the Gunslinger wins.

 

Situations like this are just to tense (2 tents) to worry about..... :lol::lol::lol:

 

..........Widder

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several local matches have given out annual awards.  You normally have to have shot the majority of the matches in that year.  Since the shooters generally will NOT have shot the exact same matches, we would go either by their placement in the match or by how many gunfights they won.  The category  placement normally didn't work out as well now days since we don't have a lot of shooters that qualify.  (You cannot use total time because the matches vary enough that it would be comparing apples to oranges.)

 

When we have a tie, I always like to see how the shooters did when the "faced" each other - shot the same matches.

 

About shoot-offs.  First they are not always possible for the shooters.

 

What kind of shoot off? 

Most I've seen were where make-up of misses was allowed, but in a few cases,it was by misses.  The later were a bummer to watch.  A shooter could shoot very slowly and win even though the others shooter blazed away and had only 1 miss - but finished 7 seconds sooner!

 

Plus, a match and a shoot off are two totally different animals. A good friend used to come in at the top of practically any match but did not always win.  But when they had the shoot-off, he was amazing and almost ALWAYS won.  He was an extrovert who thrived on the head-to-head, pressure competition.  While some others would shoot a great match and beat him due to the extent of the match, they could never keep up with him in a fast, furious shoot off.

 

Even some nationally know shooting experts you saw on tv could not win a match due to the extended, consistent effort required for the entire match.  But they could put on amazing shooting expositions for a few fast or accurate shots.

 

So realize that using a shoot off is actually picking a personality type as well as a separate talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for championship matches there needs to be a single champion other matches isn't doest matter and the same with other placements.  if misses didn't matter why track them?  if you fill that miles shouldn't matter fora tie then a head to head shootoffeither a single run or the best two out of three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we need to break a tie? 

What would be wrong with 2 champions? Just share the award for pictures; decide in a gentlemanly / ladylike manner (coin toss or rock, paper, scissors ect.) between the 2 who takes it home now and who gets their award a couple weeks later.

I heard this being discussed at the Thunder in Paradise BP shoot this weekend; this option seemed best to me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's look at this another way.....59807655098c7_Lookatthingsdifferently-Babybendingover.JPG.f4c314a52d8f7346d2dda5bd72c48c0e.JPG

 

Let's suppose in a match, the winner (Angry Bob :blink:) has a score of 114.59.

Second place (Gentle Ben :D) has a score of 114.60.

We clearly have a winner, yes? As the Russian hackers would say Nyet !!

If we take the 44 replies so far, we may not have a clear winner.

Gentle Ben states that he shot the difficult Stage 4 much faster even though Angry Bob may have been faster on the much slower methodical Stage 1 and 6. In addition, Ben pointed out that he didn't miss a target, while Bob was all over the range.

NOW BEGS THE QUESTION: If all these scenarios are not considered for a total time winner, why should they be considered for a TIE?

Let's ask Gentle Ben. 59807a052d9a8_MadasHeck-Emoji-RESIZED.jpg.503b2ba6faedf84682fc35c30fc9d7e2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Father Kit Cool Gun Garth said:

 

NOW BEGS THE QUESTION: If all these scenarios are not considered for a total time winner, why should they be considered a TIE?

Let's ask Gentle Ben. 59807a052d9a8_MadasHeck-Emoji-RESIZED.jpg.503b2ba6faedf84682fc35c30fc9d7e2.jpg

 

Whoa!  Hold on there Pard!

 

Aren't you supposed to be working out Pat's issue with the Leaderboard?  Not over here stirring up more trouble! :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO there can only be one champion so yes a tie matters I don't really care how you desire as long as it is publish on the entry form

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CodyMaverick said:

 

Whoa!  Hold on there Pard!

 

Aren't you supposed to be working out Pat's issue with the Leaderboard?  Not over here stirring up more trouble! :huh:

 

CodyMaverick,

      I'm currently multitasking, as I'm almost through with Pat's Leaderboard issue, and still have found time to run a stick in that thar hornet's nest.

     The details of my research should be published on the WIRE tomorrow.

     Details have been provided in a new THREAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the olympics, they give out two medals for ties, whatever the place.  Should work for SASS as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.