Yellowhouse Sam # 25171 Posted January 29, 2017 Posted January 29, 2017 He's not much to look at but its different....melodic then forceful. Disturbed Quote
evil dogooder Posted January 29, 2017 Posted January 29, 2017 I've always like disturbed s version better. Quote
Cat Brules Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 Disturb's version sounds pretentious or affected and put-on. Quote
DocWard Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 I like 'em both. Been known to listen to them back to back. Quote
twelve mile REB Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 In their day no one was better than S&G too bad Disturb didn't write rather than copy Quote
DocWard Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) In their day no one was better than S&G too bad Disturb didn't write rather than copy I would beg to differ. While I am not what I would call a fan of the band as a whole, they have done plenty of original music. With rare exception, I've never had a problem with covers, so long as artists attempt to do something other than just mimic the original. From my perspective, covering a song is a high form of praise. Yet, if an artist or band simply attempts to re-do the original, then as an artist, they aren't really doing anything worthy of listening to instead of the original. Sure, opinions may and will vary on this, though. Edited January 30, 2017 by DocWard Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.