Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

My 1st stage DQ, rules question


Dirty Southpaw

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I had my 1st stage DQ, what happend was when my pistol was drawn and cocked i adjusted my feet into a better stance but since both feet moved I was told I was moving with a locked and cocked gun and I recived a stage DQ, I understand you cant move but seriously all I did was adjust my stance, I made no step in any direction. So any thoughts? Did i break the rule? Im guessing I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

In for the answer, but unless both feet moved at the same time, I would not think shifting your feet in the same spot would be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless both feet moved at the same time, I would not call that a SDQ, that is unless the movement was actually taking a step to move to a different location rather than simply shifting feet like it sounded.

 

From page 27 of the SHB item #12

 

A shooter with firearm in hand shall never be allowed to move with a live round under a
cocked hammer. Movement is defined the same as “traveling” in basketball. Once the
firearm is cocked, one foot must remain in place on the ground until the firearm is made safe.
Shooting on the move is expressly disallowed. Penalty = SDQ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basketball rule would apply, but I guess the safe thing to do would be yo adjust your stance "before" cocking your pistol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From RO 1 Handbook 21.6 (Current revision)

 

20. Movement is not allowed with a loaded, cocked firearm. Movement is defined by the basketball ―traveling‖ rule. Whenever a shooter has a loaded, cocked firearm in hand, at least one foot must remain in place on the ground. 1st violation will result in Stage Disqualification; 2nd violation will result in Match Disqualification. This includes leaving the loading table with a cocked loaded firearm. Shooting on the move is expressly disallowed. Penalty = SDQ.

 

"Shuffling" the feet to maintain balance or adjust shooting stance is allowed as long as the

shooter does not actually change location.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it comes down to the definition of "shuffle". For me, a shuffle means that the feet don't leave the ground, as in slide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from what i got is when ur hammer is back only move one foot..... :)

Yes, it's nicknamed the "Basketball rule" as was said already. Shuffling your feet and changing your position is still moving! It's hard to really tell unless we were there and actually saw it. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The allowance for "shuffling" without actually changing location was recently added to the RO1 as it pertains to the BBT (basketball traveling rule).

That was as of January of 2016.

Technically, the shooter could dance a jig with a cocked firearm "in hand" as long as it was done in place...and SAFELY,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one foot moves and the other slides, my understanding and experience is you bought the penalty. This happens when someone is in the wrong position and is leaning to hit the right target from the wrong position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday I had my 1st stage DQ, what happend was when my pistol was drawn and cocked i adjusted my feet into a better stance but since both feet moved I was told I was moving with a locked and cocked gun and I recived a stage DQ, I understand you cant move but seriously all I did was adjust my stance, I made no step in any direction. So any thoughts? Did i break the rule? Im guessing I did.

 

Sounds like the club match officials (and shooters) would benefit from a review of the most recent updates to the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one foot moves and the other slides, my understanding and experience is you bought the penalty. This happens when someone is in the wrong position and is leaning to hit the right target from the wrong position.

 

Please READ the quoted clarification to the RO1

Post #s 9 & 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else besides me think that someone, especially a young'un, might not feel real excited about Cowboy Action Shooting, and joining SASS, if they came across this discussion while surfing the forum? Geeeeeeeeeesh.

 

A penalty for shifting the feet, or shuffling the feet,, or whatever, without a change of location, doesn't, in my inexperienced opinion, likely have a damn thing to do with safety, and it does likely have a whole lot to do with fun destruction. Just sayin' .........

 

Sorry, I'm new at this. Had my first match yesterday. What amazing fun! Sure beats shootin' paper targets solo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else besides me think that someone, especially a young'un, might not feel real excited about Cowboy Action Shooting, and joining SASS, if they came across this discussion while surfing the forum? Geeeeeeeeeesh.

 

A penalty for shifting the feet, or shuffling the feet,, or whatever, without a change of location, doesn't, in my inexperienced opinion, likely have a damn thing to do with safety, and it does likely have a whole lot to do with fun destruction. Just sayin' .........

THERE IS NONE!! PLEASE READ THE POSTS ABOVE YOURS

 

Sorry, I'm new at this. Had my first match yesterday. What amazing fun! Sure beats shootin' paper targets solo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lewtenttent :D

 

Yes, threads like this can be a bit tiresome at times, but I think they are quite important, they help folks from all over the country, perhaps the world, better understand the rules and the sometimes recent modifications and clarifications of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, it's discussions like this one that will surely be missed when The Whats The Call Forum starts up. Important rules information is being dissected and likely won't be when the discussion is limited. YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, it's discussions like this one that will surely be missed when The Whats The Call Forum starts up. Important rules information is being dissected and likely won't be when the discussion is limited. YMMV.

 

Question was asked & answered...that could have been done within two posts without any additional discussion or interjection of un/mis-informed opinions...even after the current applicable rule was quoted.

 

IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question was asked & answered...that could have been done within two posts without any additional discussion or interjection of un/mis-informed opinions...even after the current applicable rule was quoted.

 

IMO

So what's wrong with further discussion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what's wrong with further discussion?

 

Nothing...in and of itself; as long as it is relevant and generates additional clarification as needed.

Refusal to read or acknowledge a "black & white" reference to the current rule, or arguing for the sake of argument simply because one disagrees with the textbook response (or just to be contrary) is counterproductive.

Q + A is the intended format for the "WtC?" Forum.

I'm sure that threads there will likely generate additional "opinion" postings on the reg'lar Wire (as usual).

It is NOT our (WB/ROC) intent to monitor/moderate multiple threads once an issue has been settled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible to have the placement of this new proclamation blog moved further down, to the end of the list and out of the way of the Wire discussion, Merchant and Classifieds Forums?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what's wrong with further discussion?

That is probably fine if you wish to argue for a different rule or a rule change. I think WTC is set up to get a definitive answer to a misunderstood or misapplied rule for those who would like help interpreting the rule book. Once the ROC has clarified (it may take a couple of replies to clear up all the questions), further discussion muddles the answer. We have folks posting here, even after PWB has cited and posted the recent mod, that they would penalize a shooter for the perceived infraction. If that is the case, then why have a rule book at all? You don't have to like the answer, just follow the rules.

 

CR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was HAPPY to see the rule change in Jan. so I was up to speed on this one.

 

I ran into an issue where you had to start with the shotgun loaded on yer' shoulder.......which was weird to start with! So after I loaded and shouldered the gun (while saying the line) I adjusted my stance as I prepared to shoot by sliding my feet a few inches to widen my stance a tad. I was warned and almost got a SDQ for that.

 

It's good change IMO as we shoot in gravel, mud & step on brass etc.....if yer' only trying to maintain your balance and not moving to gain an advantage it just seems like the right move to make. Hat's off to the RO committee for this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was HAPPY to see the rule change in Jan. so I was up to speed on this one.

 

I ran into an issue where you had to start with the shotgun loaded on yer' shoulder.......which was weird to start with! So after I loaded and shouldered the gun (while saying the line) I adjusted my stance as I prepared to shoot by sliding my feet a few inches to widen my stance a tad. I was warned and almost got a SDQ for that.

 

It's good change IMO as we shoot in gravel, mud & step on brass etc.....if yer' only trying to maintain your balance and not moving to gain an advantage it just seems like the right move to make. Hat's off to the RO committee for this one.

 

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.