Red Cent Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 First I am aware of the bad rep. But the 1866 a new friend and a new shooter dropped off the other day is really neat. Picking up the Chap and shouldering the rifle makes one think the rifle had been put on a diet. Slim fore end, slim receiver, noticeably lighter, and it just feels good. Seems to have a 20# mainspring but that can be fixed. I really am enamored by this rifle. 'Course, I have not fired it or run a number of rounds through the rifle. I have four 73s and three of them have the original Cody Conagher-Lone Dude short strokes so I can attest of how slick a good rifle can run. And I have 97s by Lone Dude and I shoot three screws that was owned by Cody, sold to Dude, and then I bought them. You ain't seen slick when you handle these little Rugers. I would like to hear the specifics about the problems with this rifle. Please inform me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Slim SASS #24733 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Where do you get parts if it breaks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larsen E. Pettifogger, SASS #32933 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 They had very poor or non-existent QC and most were junk out of the box.. If you got replacement parts under warranty the replacement parts frequently fit worse than the originals. There are no replacement parts now. None of the after market go fast parts (short strokes, etc.) fit. As you have already found out the Chapparal receiver was not brass. They were blued or CCH steel. There will always be a few posters that say their's is the slickest thing since sliced bread. Then there is everyone else that hates them. Take your choice of advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Coffinmaker Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 I worked on a lot of them before I and others actually gave up on them. Head space was often off somewhere east of San Francisco with the fit of the Breach Block very sloppy in the frame. Often, the links were of a different length side to side and the Breach Block would bind. The firing pin assembly was seldom aligned with the bore in the rear of the frame causing binding. the cartridge support tab at the bottom of the Breach Block was often ... not there when new or broken within a few rounds. The replacement parts from Chaparral were worse than the parts that needed replacing, then there were no parts. I have gotten two of them to actually run well. Only one is still in service. Maybe your luck will be different, but mostly Chaparral guns were a black hole into which you poured money. Good Luck Coffinmaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Cent Posted January 26, 2016 Author Share Posted January 26, 2016 Hey, I have no thoughts of "tuning" this thing. Probably will weaken the main spring. The "feel" of this rifle is very nice and it is a shame it cannot be "fixed". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Church Key, SASS # 33713 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just shoot it. Only worry if it ever breaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Kiowa Jones #6765 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Hey, I have no thoughts of "tuning" this thing. Probably will weaken the main spring. The "feel" of this rifle is very nice and it is a shame it cannot be "fixed". Anything can be fixed if you throw enough time and money at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jailhouse Jim, SASS #13104 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Anything can be fixed if you throw enough time and money at it. +1. Some original style Winchester parts will work after some stone work. They will never be a go fast gun but I have been using a '73 in 38WCF that has been dead reliable for 6 or 7 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrison Joe, SASS #60708 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 (No real need to come on the Wire and try to justify something a pard already bought, from lack of good advice.... ) Is it enough of a shame that you want to try to solve problems a bankrupt company could not solve? Now that is an engineering challenge! You can either plow on, on your own course, or take advice of some of the best gunsmiths in SASS..... With two fine 73 gun makers out there, I wouldn't have time to troubleshoot and fix a generally lousy gun. I'd just grab a Miroku or Uberti and sail away happy. Good luck, GJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Cent Posted January 26, 2016 Author Share Posted January 26, 2016 The rifle was used very little. Little wear on the toggles or other parts. Lot of slop in the action but cycled relatively smooth. Worked on the hammer spring and it really smooth and lightened stuff up. I cycled 10 rounds through it and it did good. New shooter stopped by and I showed him the posts on the thread. He is a retired LEO and he said I'll put over the fire place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Painted Mohawk SASS 77785 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Anything can be fixed if you throw enough time and money at it. Anything can be fixed if you throw enough time and money at it. Yep that about nails it...$$$ have been spent on a Chap '73..could've bought a nice Uberti for the same money..FYI it now runs with pioneer parts, it is 'Lady McGinty's rifle..took some time to get it ironed out with a good mate helping but hopefully it will do the job. Would I buy another ...No ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumblin Tom Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I have a Chaparral in 45 LC and my wife has one in 38 special. When we first bought them we gave them to Jimmy Speer's and he did his magic on them to the best he could. He said the 38 really gave him fits to work on. He smoothe them up the best he could now that was almost 9 years ago and they are still running. I have had to really take care of them but we have worked them on the range and my 45 is used both in cowboy and wild bunch. So it has seen thousands of rounds so has the 38 just not quiet as many as the 45. The only part we have changed is the magazine to a stainless steel. Other than that I tried to go to a light weight carrier but that did not work. But we are still shooting these two rifles since 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Stevens SASS#55996 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I have a Chaparral in 45 LC and my wife has one in 38 special. When we first bought them we gave them to Jimmy Speer's and he did his magic on them to the best he could. He said the 38 really gave him fits to work on. He smoothe them up the best he could now that was almost 9 years ago and they are still running. I have had to really take care of them but we have worked them on the range and my 45 is used both in cowboy and wild bunch. So it has seen thousands of rounds so has the 38 just not quiet as many as the 45. The only part we have changed is the magazine to a stainless steel. Other than that I tried to go to a light weight carrier but that did not work. But we are still shooting these two rifles since 2006. Not suprised at that. Jimmy can make a farmers jack feel like a precision tool. His talent and innovation is amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lead Ringer Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I had a seasoned well known Wild Bunch Shooter and gun dealer, very happy to sell, The new Cowboy Shooter (me) a used 1866 Steel Frame Chaparrel Rifle. It was a beautiful rifle to look at firing pin broke almost immediately! Getting a new one was a nightmare! When trying to get it fixed, is when I learned they're junk, not be reliable and no parts available Lost Money on that Deal Regards, Ringer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Kiowa Jones #6765 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 A bit of history. The Chaparrals were made by the same folks that made the ASM SAA's. I was told by one of the former ASM importers about 25% of the ASM guns received were rejected. The bright side I guess is 75% were ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Coffinmaker Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I don't know about that 75% Nate. When I was working on em, ASMs were a mess. With Richards Conversions, one in seven would work. Not necessarily work well, just work. I never ran into a Chaparral rifle that was OK. They ALL needed work just to make em work right. Spare parts was a nightmare in it's own right. The real sad part, their SAA reproductions were really really close to the original. Coffinmaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abilene, SASS # 27489 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 It was before my time in CAS, but I heard the early ASM SAA's were very good. I do know a few people shooting the Chaparral rifles that have no problems, but they are not fast shooters. One person did tell me that on his Chaparral '73, it was binding until he loosened the sideplate screw. Tightening that screw was actually warping parts inward enough to cause problems. Another bit of ASM history I just recently heard was that ASM was in Gardonne (sp?) with the other Italian manufacturers. They moved the factory to a place some distance away out in the country, presumably for financial reasons, but some of the experienced gunsmiths working for them did not want to leave the area where they lived and there was plenty of work for them, so they quit and ASM lost some of their good labor, leading to quality problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo.chip Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Guess it is like every thing in life you only here were things go wrong. I have had five ASM pistols and only one was a pig but once worked on it worked fine and shot very well. I for one would like to find one of these 66. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 The rifle was used very little. Little wear on the toggles or other parts. Lot of slop in the action but cycled relatively smooth. Worked on the hammer spring and it really smooth and lightened stuff up. I cycled 10 rounds through it and it did good. New shooter stopped by and I showed him the posts on the thread. He is a retired LEO and he said I'll put over the fire place. Take the firing pin out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.