Badlands Bob #61228 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Police searching for man who sucked woman's toes at North Carolina Wal-Mart LINCOLNTON, N.C. – Police say a man in North Carolina sucked a woman's toes at a Wal-Mart after he convinced her he was a podiatry student and persuaded her to take off her shoes.Detective Dennis Harris said the woman agreed to try on several pairs of shoes at the discount store in Lincolnton, and that at some point during the process, the man stuck her foot in his mouth. Harris said the man apparently tried the same thing at another Wal-Mart 15 miles away, where he told a woman he was conducting a survey on the feet of different races and nationalities.The second woman also agreed to take off her shoes, but left when the suspect asked her to remove her socks. Both confrontations happened Monday. Police are looking for the man. My question is, just what would the charge be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Louis Suomi SASS #31905 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Well, it wouldn't be Sock sucking - hmmm - serial toe nibbler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Harley, #14153 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 A low level sex offense would be the charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Mountain Charlie SASS #43172 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Hoof in mouth disease carrier? I usually end up putting my own foot in my mouth. Can't imagine putting another person's foot in there, I have enough fallout with my own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvey Mushman Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Amphibian Abuse!!! Sorry, I misread this...I thought it was about TOAD sucking....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Mark Flint #31954 LIFE Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Impersonating a human Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorty Jack Hammer Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Just assault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John E. Law Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Just assault No, just battery. Assault is verbal, battery is unlawful touching. JEL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUTH-PACIFIC,SASS #59402 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 they arrested purv . I don't remember what the charge was. (go wally world) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlands Bob #61228 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 I wouldn't expect that this type of sneaky deviance would be tolerated in North Carolina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawnee McGrutt Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 What a sick ......., I can't believe they would even allow him to look at their feet. If someone approach me and ask to look at my bare feet, I would put them on the ground, so they could get closer. Keep your powder dry Shawnee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-BAR #18287 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 As Sherlock Holmes would say, "The game is afoot...." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kajun Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 If'n ya go messing around wif people's feet ya liable ta get tolio or kneasles Evil Bob, I ain't no law dog but I've slept in the dog house a few times.....I'd think the call would be a footelony charge of heinous viewing of the metatarsal and phalanges. Kajun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlands Bob #61228 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 If'n ya go messing around wif people's feet ya liable ta get tolio or kneasles Evil Bob, I ain't no law dog but I've slept in the dog house a few times.....I'd think the call would be a footelony charge of heinous viewing of the metatarsal and phalanges. Kajun I don't think they had an issue with the viewing part. I think the toe sucking is where it crossed the line of decency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs Bonney SASS # 10171 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I'd charge him with Nymphtoemania/ Bugs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rye Miles #13621 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Ooh, yuck TOE JAM!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hoss Carpenter, SASS Life 7843 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Me thinks they have a case of "little bitty feets"! Hoss C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorty Jack Hammer Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 No, just battery. Assault is verbal, battery is unlawful touching. JEL No, just battery. Assault is verbal, battery is unlawful touching. JEL Ahh legal semantics ha ha.... yes I forgot that some states still use assault and battery...In WA we have Harassment and Assault ...with the assault being physical. My meaning was that, at least in WA, it would likely not be considered a sex crime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Mo Hare, SASS #45984 Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 As Sherlock Holmes would say, "The game is afoot...." The foot is a game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John E. Law Posted March 25, 2014 Share Posted March 25, 2014 Ahh legal semantics ha ha.... yes I forgot that some states still use assault and battery...In WA we have Harassment and Assault ...with the assault being physical. My meaning was that, at least in WA, it would likely not be considered a sex crime I agree, no sex crime. Sick, gross, and pathetic yes, but no sex crime. JEL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.