Subdeacon Joe Posted December 21, 2013 Posted December 21, 2013 http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/2013/12/amended-complaint-filed-cgfs-haynie-v-pleasanton-assault-weapons-challenge/ "The court filing states that plaintiffs seek “injunctive anddeclaratory relief against Defendants [Kamala Harris and DOJ] that theCalifornia Penal Codes and Regulations defining Assault Weapons areunconstitutionally vague and ambiguous and therefore result inwrongful arrests and seizures of lawfully possessed/owned arms.” Thefiling also claims that “the unconstitutionally vague and ambiguousdefinitions of assault weapons and the ongoing risk of arrest andseizure have a chilling effect on the fundamental right to keep and beararms of ordinary and common design as protected by the Second Amendmentto the United States Constitution.” The case stems from a series of unconstitutional arrests and propertyseizures relating to firearms mis-identified as “assault weapons” bylaw enforcement. Mr. Richards was himself improperly arrested and hadlegal firearms seized twice on two difference occasions by two differentlaw enforcement agencies since 2010." Follow the link above and you will find at the bottom a copy of the complaint.Case Docket Here Bit by bit we are fighting back.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.