Jump to content
SASS Wire Forum

Haynie et al v. City of Pleasanton et al (CA's AWB)

Subdeacon Joe

Recommended Posts



"The court filing states that plaintiffs seek “injunctive and
declaratory relief against Defendants [Kamala Harris and DOJ] that the
California Penal Codes and Regulations defining Assault Weapons are
unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous and therefore result in
wrongful arrests and seizures of lawfully possessed/owned arms.” The
filing also claims that “the unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous
definitions of assault weapons and the ongoing risk of arrest and
seizure have a chilling effect on the fundamental right to keep and bear
arms of ordinary and common design as protected by the Second Amendment
to the United States Constitution.”

The case stems from a series of unconstitutional arrests and property
seizures relating to firearms mis-identified as “assault weapons” by
law enforcement. Mr. Richards was himself improperly arrested and had
legal firearms seized twice on two difference occasions by two different
law enforcement agencies since 2010."


Follow the link above and you will find at the bottom a copy of the complaint.

Case Docket Here


Bit by bit we are fighting back.

Link to comment


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.