This is one of the reasons CA has a problem

[Subdeacon Joe]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/11/you-wont-believe-which-governor-just-vetoed-an-anti-gun-bill-that-would-have-been-americas-most-resticitive-or-why-he-shot-it-down/

 

“That was, without a doubt, the most
egregious piece of anti-gun legislation ever brought to a governor for
his signature,” said Clint Montfort, an attorney with Michel and
Associates, West Coast counsel for the National Rifle Association.

“We appreciate that the governor has respected the rights of California gun owners.”

Montfort said the NRA is examining the bills that Brown did sign into law to see if any merit legal challenges.

The governor signed a measure from
Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, which bans kits that allow
people to turn regular ammunition magazines into high-capacity
magazines, as well as two other pieces of legislation that restrict the
ability of mentally ill people to possess firearms.

But Brown rejected a bill that would
have required owners whose firearms are lost or stolen to promptly
notify law enforcement. The governor noted he vetoed a similar bill last
year and still doubts that criminalizing the failure to report missing
weapons would help law enforcement track down gun traffickers or those
prohibited from owning weapons.

 

 

They ALL "merit legal challenges." Every last one of them.

[Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/11/you-wont-believe-which-governor-just-vetoed-an-anti-gun-bill-that-would-have-been-americas-most-resticitive-or-why-he-shot-it-down/

 

That was, without a doubt, the most

egregious piece of anti-gun legislation ever brought to a governor for

his signature, said Clint Montfort, an attorney with Michel and

Associates, West Coast counsel for the National Rifle Association.

 

We appreciate that the governor has respected the rights of California gun owners.

 

Montfort said the NRA is examining the bills that Brown did sign into law to see if any merit legal challenges.

 

The governor signed a measure from

Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, which bans kits that allow

people to turn regular ammunition magazines into high-capacity

magazines, as well as two other pieces of legislation that restrict the

ability of mentally ill people to possess firearms.

 

But Brown rejected a bill that would

have required owners whose firearms are lost or stolen to promptly

notify law enforcement. The governor noted he vetoed a similar bill last

year and still doubts that criminalizing the failure to report missing

weapons would help law enforcement track down gun traffickers or those

prohibited from owning weapons.

 

 

They ALL "merit legal challenges." Every last one of them.

The NRA knows this..about every anti gun law has legal challenges....pick the ones you can defeat now while continuing to work on the ones that are more difficult. I see nothing wrong with the NRA's statement.

 

GG

[Subdeacon Joe]

There is the implication that some of them are just fine. Ban lead ammo for hunting now, then ban it for target shooting. Ban all magazines that hold over 10 rounds, and parts that go to magazines that hold more than 10, soon you won't be able to get parts to repair your 10 rounders. As I said, the ALL need to be fought, and we need all the help we can get to do it. Calguns, CRPA, and others in state are doing their part, but it's like sending a few platoons to stop a division.

[The Shoer 27979]

I agree with Joe, Gunner we can no longer pick and choice what law we challenge, we have to challenge them all

[The Original Lumpy Gritz]

AB-48 also affects our cowboy rifles, and .22s.

AND DON'T THINK IT WAS WRITTEN THAT WAY BY "ACCIDENT", EITHER

LG

[The Shoer 27979]

I can so see this one in court Lumpy, just because it will outlaw so many rifles in common use.

[Hardpan Curmudgeon SASS #8967]

I can so see this one in court Lumpy, just because it will outlaw so many rifles in common use.

 

I surely hope so, Shoer.... I do.

[Cliff Hanger #3720LR]

Tubular magazines are still exempted as I read the new law. (page updated Oct 15th 2013)

---AB 48 signed in to law.---

16740.5. As used in this part, a "large-capacity magazine" shall not be construed to include any of the following:

(a) A .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device.
( A tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action

[Subdeacon Joe]

Still needs to be fought in court, Cliff. And to fight all of them, we need outside help.

[Gunner Gatlin, SASS 10274L]

I agree with Joe, Gunner we can no longer pick and choice what law we challenge, we have to challenge them all

 

You misunderstood (happens these days)- I said "pick the ones you can defeat now while continuing to work on the ones that are more difficult.

 

GG ~