Subdeacon Joe Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 I had forgotten about this section: "In Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846), the Georgia Supreme Court construed the Second Amendment as protecting the “natural right of self-defence” and therefore struck down a ban on carrying pistols openly. Its opinion perfectly captured the way in which the operative clause of the Second Amendment furthers the purpose announced right: “The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is, that ANY LAW, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled under foot by Charles I. and his two wicked sons and successors, re-established by the revolution of 1688, conveyed to this land of liberty by the colonists, and finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna Charta!” -Supreme Court Justice Scalia, ruling opinion D.C. v. Heller Link to comment
Muleshoe Bill SASS #67022 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 And all it will take is for a certain current Supreme Court Justice to retire and the ruling president to appoint another like the last two and the next decision will read entirely opposite. We need to keep it in mind to get out the vote next year in the midterms and it NOT too early! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.